| April
17, 2006
When Will the Fed Stop?
When will the Federal Reserve stop
raising interest rates? It is the question everyone is asking
these days.
The federal funds rate, which is the
rate at which banks lend and borrow money for short-term needs,
is now 4.75%. As recently as June 2004 the rate was 1%.
It seems inevitable that the Fed will take fed funds to 5% when
the FOMC meets on May 10th, but will the Fed stop there?
This question is interesting, but
another question is more important. What will happen to real
interest rates, i.e., interest rates adjusted for inflation?
It is real interest rates that will determine the dollar's future.
For months formidable forces of inflation
and other forms of monetary debasement have been gathering at a
frightening pace. Rising energy prices, out-of-control federal
spending, and a growing mountain of debt are just some of the more
visible problems. So how does the Federal Reserve –
the guardian of the US dollar – respond to this threat?
Not to worry. We have been told
that the Federal Reserve will continue to raise interest rates at
a “measured pace”. It is really silly that so
many commentators make a big deal of this inane statement.
Would the Fed actually come out and say anything else? Would
it be honest with the American people and say that the threat of
inflation is not only real, but also growing? Will the Fed
state that it is going to raise interest rates at a ‘rapid
pace’ in order to prevent more inflation?
Of course not, but in reality that is exactly what the Federal Reserve
should be doing. It should be raising interest rates at a
‘rapid pace’ if it intends to conquer today’s
monetary problems and save the dollar from a total collapse.
Ben Bernanke should be taking direction from Paul Volcker, who raised
interest rates at a ‘rapid pace’ after he was appointed
chairman of the Federal Reserve in 1979.
Mr. Volcker understood that meaningful
actions were necessary to save the dollar from a total inflationary
collapse. So he did what he had to do. He raised dollar
interest rates at a rapid pace because he understood that only high
interest rates would save the dollar. Look at it this way.
Consumers have a choice – to
hold dollars (which represent just some uncertain, intangible promise)
or to hold gold (which is a real and tangible asset). Gold
is money that is not contingent upon some central bank or Fed chairman’s
promise. The trade-off is that you do not earn any interest
on your gold because you are not taking the risk of someone’s
promise. But when monetary problems grow, consumers increasingly
doubt central bank promises and as a result, choose to forego interest
income they could earn on dollars. They opt out of a troubled
dollar by converting their purchasing power into the safety and
security of gold. Importantly, once this trend to move out
from the dollar starts, it is hard to stop, which was the situation
faced by Mr. Volcker when he became Fed chairman.
He used the only tool available to
him to re-establish confidence in the dollar. He started raising
interest rates as soon as he assumed office and kept on raising
them. He needed to get people to move their wealth out from
their gold and back into dollars, and he knew the only way to do
this (without imposing capital controls) was to raise dollar interest
rates high enough in order to entice – i.e.,
essentially bribe – consumers back into
the dollar.
Mr. Volcker kept raising interest
rates until they were much higher than the rate of inflation.
In other words, real dollar interest rates (i.e., dollar interest
rates less the rate of inflation) soared to record highs –
to levels that had been unimaginable only a few years before and
have never been seen since.
These record high real interest rates
did the job intended. They enticed a lot of people out of
gold and other tangible assets, and moved them back into dollars
to earn the interest income from the high real interest rates Mr.
Volcker created. But Ben Bernanke is not doing this, nor did
his predecessor, Alan Greenspan. Even though nominal interest
rates have been climbing under their watch, real interest rates
remain low, and probably negative depending upon how one measures
the true rate of inflation.
Real interest rates are calculated
by subtracting the inflation rate from the federal funds rate.
If the difference is positive, dollar holders are earning a rate
of return greater than the rate of inflation, i.e., their purchasing
power is increasing. Conversely, their purchasing power is
decreasing if real interest rates are negative because in this case,
inflation more than erodes what dollar holders gain in interest
income.
Generally, a positive return is necessary
to keep consumers in dollars. In other words, to entice consumers
to hold dollars and avoid gold, real dollar interest rates should
be positive. When real rates are negative, the gold price
climbs, as consumers flee the dollar and demand gold instead, which
explains exactly what happened in the 1970’s.
Conversely, when real dollar interest
rates soar, as they did under Mr. Volcker, the price of gold falls.
Look at what happened in the early 1980’s. It was the
unprecedented climb in real interest rates that stopped gold’s
meteoric advance back then.
Since the late 1990’s real rates
have been falling. What’s more, real rates have been
negative for much of this time, so is it any surprise that the gold
price is rising? Of course not.
Consumers are not dumb. They
look through the nonsense of the “core” CPI, and their
decisions are not affected by the mindless jawboning from the Federal
Reserve. Consumers understand that the purchasing power of
their dollars is being inflated away. The true rate of inflation
is explained by economist John Williams proprietor of http://www.shadowstats.com/
as follows: “Real CPI right now is running about 8
percent...If you were to peel back changes that were made in the
CPI going back to the Carter years, you'd see that [the yearly rise
in] the CPI would now be 3.5-4 percent higher [than reported].”
By this estimate, the rate of inflation
is well above the 4.75% fed funds rate. So the Fed is way
behind the curve because real interest rates are negative.
There is in effect no cost to borrowing fed funds, which is very
inflationary. Consequently, consumers understand that one
is better off owning gold, and will continue to be better off until
the Fed chairman does what Mr. Volcker did – raise dollar
interest rates at a ‘rapid pace’. Will it happen?
No, it won’t,
and the reason is simple. The US today cannot afford to pay
the bill of high real interest rates.
When Mr. Volcker became Fed chairman,
the US was the largest creditor nation in the world. There
was no mountain of debt, no derivatives bubble, no stock market
bubble, and the US savings rate was positive. What’s
more the federal government’s budget deficit was relatively
tame compared to the big spending under the Bush administration,
and the US was not fighting any foreign war – it was the Soviets
who were bogged down in Afghanistan.
Today’s circumstances are the
exact opposite. So Mr. Bernanke cannot raise interest rates
to achieve the positive real interest rates that Mr. Volcker needed
to save the dollar. If it were tried, the Fed would destroy
what remains of US economic activity. The growing interest
expense burden would kill the federal government’s ability
to maintain the illusion that it is solvent and can repay its debts.
In other words, raising interest rates today like Mr. Volcker did
would sink the economy.
So Mr. Bernanke – just like
Mr. Greenspan before him – is left to using the only tool
available, namely, jawboning, which is the politically correct term
for propaganda. There is of course another tool – capital
controls. They will come when jawboning no longer does the
job, which means soon – possibly as early as next year.
But neither jawboning nor the threat of capital controls will stop
the gold price from rising.
___________________________________________
James Turk is the Founder & Chairman of GoldMoney.com.
He writes The Freemarket Gold & Money Report, and his latest
book is The Coming Collapse of the Dollar.
|