| |
| Doing Exactly What They Said They Would
Do |
| |
- The Federal Reserve is still increasing Total
Fed Credit, which increases credit in the banks, which increases
loans, which increases the money supply, which increases prices,
which increases my wailing and crying about how we are all freaking
doomed by inflation, and last week they increased it by only another
$3 billion, which was used (apparently) to buy stocks and bonds.
A quick look at the Repo market ("peep") shows that
the Fed is providing money like crazy, and last Thursday there
were more than $20 billion of Repos in one day! One day!
The foreign central banks are still plowing money
into the US, and last week Custody Holdings of US Debt held at
the Fed ballooned up another $8.2 billion, which seems to demonstrate
a very, very low level of intellectual capacity, as the dollar
lost about 7% of its value in the last month alone, socking them
with nice losses! Hahaha!
Probably because of the huge amounts of credit and
money being created by the world's central banks, I seem to notice
more and more people referring to this massive and irresponsible
"printing" of money as the beginning of a new Weimar
era, which is itself a reference to the massive printing of money
by post-WWI Germany and the utter economic devastation that resulted.
But this not about whether the rulers of the old
Weimar Germany were buttheads (they were) or whether the rulers
of America's economy are buttheads (they are) but about the horrible
economic price that a nation pays for such irresponsible stupidity.
And don't look to me for a solution, as there isn't one, because
if there was a painless solution to this insane system of a fiat
currency created by debt, then at least one other person in all
of history would have thought of it already. And when you also
allow banks to operate with zero reserves (and thus infinite multiplication
of deposits), the absurdity of thinking that there is a solution
becomes even more ludicrous. And when you further allow the massive
increase in the size and cost of government, then asking for a
solution becomes so ludicrous (the audience shouts out "How
ludicrous, Mogambo?") I can do little but laugh hahahaha!
The sad, ugly truth (SUT) is that there is no way
out of a devalued currency caused by a government printing up
too much of it. That is why the Founding Fathers specifically
wrote into the Constitution that money shall only be of silver
and gold, because the government cannot print silver and gold,
and this prevents the necessity of a "solution"!
A hand goes up in the front row. "So, if so,"
he says quizzically, "whither silver and gold in such a situation?"
Well, instead of endless theoretical debate, that question can
perhaps be answered more easily by seeing what happened in the
last "Weimar" over-production of money and credit. And
for that we owe thanks to Phil for the chart showing that in 1919
Weimar Germany you could sell (or buy) an ounce of gold for 170
Reichmarks. In 1923, a mere four years later, you got 87 trillion
Reichmarks when you sold an ounce of gold. Nice investment there,
in nominal terms! Of course, a Reichmark couldn't buy very much
in 1923, as the money was devalued to essentially zero. But 87
trillion of them would buy you an ounce of gold!
As for silver, it went from 12 Reichmarks an ounce
to, in the same four years, 543 billion Reichmarks. Nice investment
from, again, a nominal standpoint!
- Judging by the tone of the panicky emails I have
been getting recently, people other than I think that things are
getting weird and inexplicable. Relatively predictable ratios
are not making sense anymore, open interest is behaving weirdly,
share prices and fundamentals are diverging, etc. etc. etc., resulting
in more sense of unease, trending to frantic panic, and these
poor, deluded people think that an idiot like me could possibly
supply some explanation.
Well, it is my Tremendous Mogambo Pleasure (TMP)
to announce that I actually DO have an answer for all of this
current weirdness! And the reason I am so happy is that the answer
is simplicity itself: The Federal Reserve is on record as saying
that they will happily intervene in any market, at any time, with
any level of participation, and that they have the legal authority
to do it by virtue an Executive Order of the President of the
USA! So the answer is easy, my Darling Mogambo Grasshoppers (DMG);
the Federal Reserve (in cooperation with all the other central
banks of the world who are in this thing up to their eyeballs)
is doing exactly what they said they would do!
And why are they doing this? Because our creditors
have us right where they want us, which is when they can dictate
terms to us, because they have the power to destroy our economy
with the flick of a finger. Yes, they would suffer, too. But they
will not die, unlike our stupid, malignant economy composed primarily
of the twin idiocies of financial services and massive government
spending.
And with that kind of pure power, they can get otherwise-unattainable
items, such as modern, up-to-the minute weapons and war technology
that we paranoid, gold-bug, gun-nuts can't get from the Army-Navy
Surplus store, and when we insist on Second Amendment grounds,
they almost break their fingers dialing the FBI to "report"
me.
This is not to mention, of course, their new ability
to extort us to use our military muscle as hired goons, doing
the dirty-work of some Asian Big Bosses (ABBs), primarily the
Japanese and Chinese, who hold our economy in their hands by holding
our debt in their hands.
And if you don't think that such slimy business
is not being commonly done, more and more all the time, then let
the Mocking And Scornful Laugh Of The Mogambo (MASLOTM) ring in
your ears, my optimistic young ones! Hahahaha!
Even Bill Bonner at DailyReckoning.com seems to
have has his finger on this pulse of rampant corruption when he
writes " 'Cheney rebukes Russians,' the front page of today’s
International Herald Tribune tells us. We had to a laugh. What’s
his beef with the Russians? Get this. They’re using oil
and gas as 'tools of intimidation and blackmail.' In other words,
they’re using their resources to get what they want, just
as America does with its trade policies and foreign aid."
Hahaha! Exactly!
But to show you how out of touch Cheney is, it is
not just Russia, but Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba, Iran, North Korea,
China, Russia and others who are forming anti-bully, anti-American
alliances, and they are using oil to hurt us back.
Now, let's also be sure and understand why Cheney
uses the word "blackmail" which I assume he used correctly,
as blackmail involves somebody knowing something nasty about something
Cheney has illegally done, and now they are using it to extort
money and cooperation.
And since we are talking about extortion by blackmail,
let's not forget the warehouses full of incriminating evidence
of felonious misdeeds of our politicians. And if you don't think
that there is a lot of THAT going on in the world, then I am glad
to meet you! This proves that you are one of the few people in
the world (it seems) who are not blackmailing the poor, beleaguered
Mogambo with copies of those embarrassing photos, showing him
standing there with that stupid towel wrapped around him in the
locker room while the Danish cheerleading squad is laughing and
mocking him, which is, as I have previously explained, not the
reaction I had expected, according to the graffiti I read on the
men's room wall. So who's the real victim here?
So the Federal Reserve is intervening in the markets,
and one of the ways to do that is to buy stock futures, and for
them to then to tell the Wall Street houses, which is the other
side of this trade, to buy stocks to cover their short position
in futures, and for the Fed to buy some bond futures, and for
them to then tell the Wall Street houses, which is the other side
of this trade, to buy bonds to cover their short position in bond
futures, too. This will keep stock prices high, keep bond prices
high (and thus interest rates low), allow the Asian Big Bosses
to make some more money on their hoard of American money, stocks
and bonds, and let Wall Street make a nice pile of cash in the
process, too.
And how much money are we talking about? Well,
from 'Nihon Keizai', which is supposed to be Japan's leading economic
newspaper, we learn that "Brazil, Russia, India and China,
referred to as BRIC group that currently manifests the world's
highest economic growth rate, have surpassed G7 countries in their
forex /gold holdings for the first time in history.
"As of the end of March, the aggregate holdings
of BRIC amounted to $1,292,200 million, according to estimates.
As compared with the state of affairs in this respect as of the
end of 2004, the forex/gold holdings of BRIC went up by 40 per
cent.
"At the same time, the forex /gold reserves
of G7 countries (Britain, Germany, Italy, Canada, the United States,
France, and Japan) amounted to $1,253,900 million."
So relax, maybe take a little time away from yelling
at your hateful, brain-damaged children, and get some more gold
and silver, or maybe add another comforting layer of protective
armor to your own version of the Mogambo Bunker Of Screaming Panic
(MBOSP), or maybe even holding a few Mogambo Family Emergency
Response (MFER) drills, which actually boils down to making sure
that they get to the bunker before I do, what with that unfortunate
"Shoot first and ask questions later" policy, which
I have been meaning to change, but never did. But, man, on the
other hand, you should see them hustle their little fannies now!
And this meddling in the markets by the Federal
Reserve has not gone unnoticed in the cosmos. You puny Earthlings
don't know it, but most of the UFOs visiting Earth these days
have bumper stickers that say "Glorb blaanga Earth!"
which is difficult to translate into English, but is, surprisingly,
a literal translation from an ancient Germanic-Nordic phrase "Grosse
bigga dum auf dem Stupum kopfen glob glob globber" which
means, again literally, "Big stupid mistake, diggers of mushrooms!"
- Alert reader Jerry D. writes that he eats a lot
of oats, and that oats cost $1.58 per bucket for a couple of years,
but "yesterday I paid $2.08 for them. That's roughly 25 percent
on plain raw oats in less than 12 months from the same local grocer."
Perhaps it is the oats talking, but he also opines
"I believe that there is no longer any nobility in any major
government, and that a large network of collaborators are inching
us toward Orwell's worst-case scenario." Exactly! And if
that is any indication of the clear thinking that oats give you,
then I am now a big fan of them, too!
And it is not just oats that are costing more, as
we found out from alert reader Rebecca I., who says "I have
definite proof I am personally experiencing inflation. I just
received the breakdown of my benefits package and its costs. In
2004, the total cost was $15,731, as compared to 2005 when it
was $17,469, for a total increase of 11%."
- For those of us who are dismayed at the decision
by the Federal Reserve to no longer publish the M3 numbers, which
is the broadest measure of the money supply, alert reader Tom
McC. thinks like we do, but with a nautical bent. He says "I
refer to the government's refusal to publish M3 statistics going
forward as the Depth Gauge gambit, as it is akin to disconnecting
the depth gauge as a means of combating flooding in a submarine."
- From the AP we get the headline "Ginsburg:
Congress' Watchdog Plan 'Scary' " by Gina Holland. She reports
that Sen. Charles Grassley said last week that "the judiciary
wasn't doing enough policing of itself." Naturally, he has
a plan. Ms. Holland writes "His plan would create an inspector
general to oversee federal courts including the Supreme Court.
The inspector general would be directed to report any judicial
misconduct to the Justice Department."
Naturally, here comes Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, one of
the most worthless of the Supreme Court judges, and Ms. Holland
reports that that Ginsburg "told a gathering of the American
Bar Association that lawyers should stick up for judges when they
are criticized by congressional leaders." Hahaha! What chutzpah!
It's apparently okay with Ms. Ginsburg and her precious
Supreme Court for the Congress and our idiotic President to ride
roughshod over the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and to monitor,
regulate and spy on every detail of every American's life, but
she is aghast that she and her loathsome Supreme Court ilk should
have to suffer the same indignities! She says that "My sense
now is that the judiciary is under assault in a way that I haven't
seen before." I agree, as we have never had a Supreme Court
as so deserving of contempt before! Well, maybe back in 1933 when
the Supreme Court let FDR ignore the Constitutional requirement
that money will only be of silver and gold, which started us on
the path to where we are today, a country bankrupted by a fiat
currency.
But she doesn't mention her own calumny, but instead
wails about how she was upset by "proposals by senior Republicans
who want an inspector general to police judges' acceptance of
free trips or their possible financial interests with groups that
could appear before them." Hahaha! Now she has apparently
found that the Constitution allows corruption by the Supreme Court!
Hahaha!
- If you want to know the kind of idiocy that is
being taught in upper-level economics these days, economics student
Anna says that she spends her time taking "the second order
partial derivatives of a generic Cobb-Douglas equation and then
solving for the input equations in terms of the constants."
Hahahaha! This is economics? Hahaha!
But this is the incredible stupidity that passes
for economics these days, and then you wonder why I am always
standing on the side of 49th Street, yelling at people in cars
"Your money is doomed and you are doomed!"
- Perhaps as a result of gasoline being more expensive,
as a result of oil being more expensive, as a result of the dollar
becoming more worthless in terms of buying power, the Consumer
Confidence indicator dropped to 67.1 in May, which was down a
lot from April's 89.4 reading. People don't spend when they are
not confident.
- Bob Wood, of KMA, was commenting on the jobs reports
released last Friday, and specifically referred to the "birth/death
model" that the Bureau of Labor Statistics uses to estimate
the number of jobs created by new businesses (which are so new
that the jobs created are not counted yet, including an estimate
of the number of businesses that went under and whose employees
are now looking for new jobs, even though they are still counted
as "employed"). He writes, "Wow, another 138,000
new jobs, and only 271,000 of them are fake."
And, not content with the wry bon mot, he goes on
to note that Table A-12 is "where we see that the unemployment
rate is really 8.2%, not the 4.7% miracle engineered by the Bush
team."
Perhaps this all squares with the government reporting the bad
news of "Unit labor costs -- a key gauge of profit and price
pressures monitored by the Federal Reserve for clues on wage inflation
-- increased at a 2.5 percent annual pace." But the good
news, I guess, is that when companies dump employee benefit programs,
"Manufacturing unit labor costs actually declined, at a 2.6
percent annualized pace, after dropping at a 3.3 percent rate
in the fourth quarter of last year, while compensation per hour
advanced at the tepid rate of 1.5 percent."
Or maybe is has something to do with the news that,
the Labor Department said new claims for state unemployment insurance
benefits increased to 322,000 in the week ended April 29.
Or perhaps it was Ashraf Laidi writing the essay
entitled "US Payrolls: Ominous Justification for Further
Dollar Selling" and posted on SafeHaven.com. He sums it up
as "It was the worst of both worlds (slower growth and rising
inflationary threats)."
- Noting that illegal aliens who came sneaking across
the border into the USA assert that they have somehow acquired
"rights" in doing so, I am now finally able to solve
the problem of the homeless in America! So the next time that
the Nobel Prize in Economics is awarded, along with that million
dollar prize that would come in real handy right now, I am sure
to win with my Fabulous New Mogambo Plan To Eliminate Homelessness
(FNMPTEH). In a nutshell, if you are homeless, merely find a house
being occupied by illegal aliens, wait until they go to bed, sneak
into their house and relax! When they wake up in the morning,
merely tell them that you agree with them that illegal trespassers
have "rights"! They will, I assume, be happy to immediately
oblige, providing you with a nice breakfast, and free housing,
food, medical care and education for as long as you live! The
problem of homelessness is thus solved! In my notes, I see where
I have written "Appear humble as the adoring crowd applauds
in awe and gratitude."
- An interesting essay entitled "Bull in Bear's
Skin?" by Antal E. Fekete, who is a Professor Emeritus at
Memorial University of Newfoundland, has some tips for those of
you who like techniques for timing markets, especially metals.
He explains, "Basis is the name for the spread between the
nearby futures price and the spot price. Backwardation is the
market phenomenon whereby nearby futures are selling at a premium
over the more distant. The normal condition for monetary metals
is the opposite, contango, indicating that supply is plentiful.
Backwardation in monetary metals is a foolproof indicator that
supplies are getting tight. Its shrinking reveals that short selling
is becoming counter-productive so that the shorts may be getting
ready to cover. Conversely, the widening of the basis tells you
that shortages may soon end, and the shorts are likely to start
selling once more."
- On FinancialSense.com we read the essay "The
Silent Dollar Crash & Parallel Investment Universe" by
Econotech which notes "When measured in the price of gold,
the dollar and U.S. financial assets have already crashed. For
example, relative to gold, as of Friday’s close, since their
last relative highs in June-July 2005, the U.S. dollar index has
declined 39%, the 10-year Treasury bond 43%, and the S&P 500
31%. These declines have become free-fall in the last month or
so."
They go on to write that, surprisingly to the International
Monetary Fund, "capital is flowing from emerging markets
to industrial countries (notably the United States), the opposite
of what would be predicted by economic theory."
Econotech goes on to note that the International
Monetary Fund, in their "Stability" report, notes that
the risks of derivatives is pretty dramatic. Specifically, they
say “credit derivative products have significantly enhanced
the 'transferability' of credit risks by allowing for the increased
specificity of credit exposures, to meet different investor demands,
particularly in the 'primary' risk transfer markets." By
this time I am starting to sneer in Utter Mogambo Disrespect (UMD),
as I expect this to be just another laughable explanation (a la
the Federal Reserve) about how "derivatives are so wonderful."
I am halted in mid-spit, however, when they immediately go on
to say "However, once transferred, secondary market liquidity
risks and related contagion effects remain, and may constitute
the most significant stability risk emanating from the structured
credit markets.”
Wiping the dribbled sputum from my chin at this
surprising admission, the IMF correctly concludes “In the
structured credit markets, we believe the risk of liquidity disturbances
is material." What to do about it? Well, the IMF has an answer!
"Whether and how these new risks materialize, and the severity
of their impact, will critically depend on the degree to which
the diversity of market participants increases, the various structural
frictions are reduced, and market surveillance is improved.”
In short, there has to be some new ways devised
to, somehow, get more of the public to assume the risks ("diversity
of market participants"), make it easier to lay on more derivatives
(reduction of "structural frictions") and use some lies
about "improved market surveillance" to get them to
swallow it. Hahaha! The IMF! Hahaha! Some things never change!
- John Spence and Myra P. Long wrote the essay "Weighing
Gold Miners Against the Metal" in which they note "Two
gold ETFs alone (GLD and IAU) have already pulled in over $7.1
billion dollars." In existence as financial entities for
less than a year, and already they pulled in over $7 billion dollars?
Wow!
They also weigh the pros and cons about mining stocks.
They write "Mining stocks tend to be more volatile than the
metal, though stocks receive kinder tax treatment than bullion.
At the same time, holding gold removes the risk of company missteps
and other factors, while giving precious-metals bugs - who tend
to be a bearish bunch - the peace of mind of owning the physical
bullion."
"But," I cry out in my anguish "there
comes a point when all available room in the house is already
being used to store huge quantities of gold, silver and ammunition,
and everybody is always bumping into something, and then they
are all whining and complaining! What do I do?"
Sensing my plea for him to please, please, please
recommend holding stocks instead of bullion, Jon Nadler, an investment
products analyst at Kitco.com., said "'Mining company shares
are simply that -- 'a paper promise of performance by the company.
Investment in the shares leads to currency, management and general
stock-market risk."
Just as I was giving up the idea of owning mining
stocks, Brien Lundin, editor of Gold Newsletter, jumps in and
says "Mining equities leverage the gains or losses in metals
themselves. On the way up, this can be a wonderful thing. On the
way down, it can become quite a painful thing."
He added, "Investors need to know that sometimes
this effect is muted, or even works against them." To prove
it, he reveals that "Through the end of March, the StreetTracks
Gold Trust ETF was up 27.2% for the previous 12 months, versus
63.5% for the average precious-metals mutual fund."
Mr. Nadler added that with gold bullion, holding
it is equal to holding "pure value or pure asset; no one
can default on it, there is no credit risk, there is no risk of
issuing more shares or printing more money. It is the asset you
would buy to protect against a potential decline in your other
assets," he said. It "performs when paper does not."
Mr. Nadler is straightforward in his opinion about
owning gold bullion, and said "There is no doubt that we
remain strong advocates of fully-owned and fully-paid physical
bullion. If one wishes to purely speculate, they could entertain
ETF or options on gold, perhaps a smattering of mining shares,
but that is about it." I couldn't have said it better myself,
and God knows I've tried!
And speaking of ETFs, Jason Hommel of SilverStockReport.com
reports that the Barclays silver ETF is going gangbusters. "Ominously,"
he writes "this week, 42 million ounces of silver were bought
by the Silver ETF in the first 5 days of trading!" He goes
on to note, continuing in the ominous vein, that things are heating
up on the futures exchanges, too. "For a long time, only
1% of futures contracts resulted in delivery. Today, it is increasing
toward 10% or more, which is growing ominous." Commenting
on all of this, he says "The Silver ETF, which is acquiring
allocated physical silver, may soon bring the paper silver trading
games to an abrupt end." Thus you realize why he uses the
word "ominous," especially if you are one of the market-rigging
scumbags who is massively short silver as a result of this long-term
market-rigging scam.
- If you wanted real proof that demand for oil will
continue to rise for a long, long time, then look no further than
Doug Noland's Credit Bubble Bulletin at the PrudentBear.com site.
He reports that “China’s total power consumption during
the first half of this year is expected to increase 11.5%, said
the China Electricity Council.” Twelve percent increase
in a half year! Wow! And where did they get the fuel to produce
that power? Oil!
And furthermore, they are building lots and lots
of paved roads, avenues, streets, lanes, expressways, turnpikes
and thruways, which is highly freaking significant (HFS) because
merely creating roads is, as it turns out, the One Sure Thing
(OST) to lead to macro- and micro-economic growth. And it takes
oil, lots and lots of oil, to power all that construction. And
the Chinese will be buying millions more cars per year with which
to ride upon these selfsame highways and byways, all of which
requires oil. Lots and lots of oil. And you thought oil might
one day go DOWN in price? Hahahaha!
But Mr. Noland is not done pummeling us, and instead
takes direct aim at my heart with a sharpened rapier when he quotes
Bloomberg's Alex Tanzi as reporting “More homeowners received
cash from home refinancings in the first quarter, according to
Freddie Mac." I leap to my feet in surprise, which was unfortunate,
as I was then immediately knocked to the floor with the further
news "In the first quarter of 2006, 88 percent of Freddie
Mac owned loans that were refinanced resulted in new mortgages
of at least five percent more than the original mortgages."
Five percent more debt in 88% of mortgage refinancings? Yow! Perhaps
this headlong dive into the Lake Of Financial Stupidity explains
the fact that the increase in the debt level "was up from
81 percent the previous quarter and is the highest since the third
quarter 1990.”
- I would like to take this lull in the festivities
to answer a of scenario suggested by readers who are probably
a whole lot smarter than I, and seem to have no compunctions about
demonstrating the fact, to the un-ending delight and amusement
of my family and co-workers.
I refer to the conspiracy to eliminate cash money,
and going to a completely electronic money. I declare with my
usual Mogambo Supercilious Sneer (MSS) that it will not happen,
as only cash is anonymous. Going to a purely electronic debit/credit
format would require computer entries for every transaction, and
thus there would always be a paper trail as evidence. Oops!
Therefore, there could be no political corruption
and graft, no illegal activities of any kind involving money,
and the IRS would be able to easily verify every taxable dime
made by any taxable entity, including the kids who mow lawns and
baby sitters. Like I said; it ain't a-gonna happen.
- If you think this brouhaha with Iran will one
day blow over, wrong-o. Iran wants, and needs, to have a war with
the USA. Why? Let me quote from the Milken Institute Journal of
Economic Policy. They note that in "1979, Iran's GDP roughly
equaled Spain's; it pumped one-tenth of the worlds oil and nurtured
a vibrant middle class. Today, per capita income is one-third
that of Spain, oil production is down by 30% and the middle class
is being squeezed by inflation, unemployment and stagnant wages."
And it ain't just the middle class suffering, and by a long, long
shot.
In short, the Iranian morons need a scapegoat for
their self-inflicted problems just as much as American morons
and the loathsome Bush crowd needs one, and for the same reasons;
bankruptcy from sheer economic stupidity. And that has always
meant war, and I have no reason to think that "this time
is different." Ugh.
****Mogambo sez: It's not just you and me buying gold. I saw a
report that Chinese economists are urging that China quadruple
its gold reserves from 600 tonnes to 2500 tonnes. This is equivalent
to about a year's worth of mine output. How's that for shifting
the supply/demand dynamic to Mogambo Mega Bullish (MMB)?
But if the Chinese were as smart as they think
they are, they would be accumulating silver, which is poised for
explosive price rises in the coming years, perhaps even surpassing
the price of gold! Buying silver now is your chance to show that
you are smarter than 1.3 billion Chinamen!
Richard Daughty, the angriest guy in economics
9241 54th Street North
Pinellas Park, FL 33782
727 546 5568
e-mail: RichardSmithGroup@Verizon.net
|