|
- The Fed actually drained a little credit last
week, taking it down $3 billion. Why? I figure they were all too
busy partying too much and drinking too much and pinching each
other on the butt too much. Probably giggling too much while the
do it, too. Now that Ben "Bird Brain" Bernanke has been
chosen to take over the Federal Reserve, they know that when the
guy running the show actually WANTS inflation, as he manifestly
does, then it is time to celebrate with a big, blow-out toga party,
using some petty cash to get some kegs of beer and some of whatever
in the hell they are smoking that makes them think their stupid
little New Age theories could possibly work in the real world.
But I have not personally gone to the Federal Reserve
to check on them, as I feel kind of crappy here lately, mostly
as a result of getting violently sick whenever I read about how
Alan Greenspan (whom I consider the absolute worst central banker
in American history) is such a hot shot because of his "deft"
handling of an Argentina crisis, or a Russian crisis, or a Korean
crisis, or a Mexican crisis, or a Philippine crisis, or a Long
Term Capital Management crisis, or a Y2K crisis, or blah blah
blah. I can hardly read one of these stupid articles without gagging
and sticking pins in a voodoo doll of the guy who wrote it, because
what none of these clueless, dimwit "journalists" seem
to understand is that Alan Greenspan CAUSED all the crises in
the first damned place by creating so damned much money for so
long, and all that money eventually percolated into all these
other things, and after awhile it got into trouble after causing
bubble after bubble all over the place. Then something inevitably
bad happened as a result. And then to try and "help"
by correcting his stupid mistake, he continually jammed MORE money
into the economy! Astonishing! He "fixed" the problem
he caused by driving interest rates down to insanely-low rates,
and thus insured that we would soon suffer from more price inflation
that inevitably follows such reckless monetary inflation!
Now I must pause, as I have just re-read what I
just wrote, and I made myself sick again. Urk. Taking a deep breath
and gobbling a taco for strength, I feel life returning to the
brawny arms of The Mogambo (BAOTM), and ducking into a nearby
telephone booth, I emerge again as the mighty loudmouth Mogambo
(MLM)! Now I have a new, vibrant vigor in my voice as I say that
all of this Alan Greenspan crap is the opposite- the exact freaking
opposite, I tells ya! -of what a competent central banker is supposed
to do! If he really WAS a good central banker, none of these bad
"crisis" things would have happened in the first damned
place! If Alan Greenspan was a great central banker, his 18 years
in office would have been one of smooth, orderly, non-inflationary
growth with a generally rising standard of living for everybody,
instead of the disgusting piece of crap we call the American economy
and, as the logical extension, the global economy. In fact, this
theme is echoed in the title of a book by a guy named Karl Hosch
which reads "The Whole World Is Going To Crap!!!" and
I note that the three exclamation points are his.
But what we got from Alan Greenspan and the buttheads
that infest the Federal Reserve, as I ceaselessly point out over
and over and over again mostly because there is something seriously
wrong with me, is the opposite of what we should have gotten.
Even Bill Bonner at the Daily Reckoning wonders why it is that
"Bloomberg reports that wages are rising more slowly than
at any time in the last 24 years" and if this is true, then
he wonders "If Alan Greenspan has performed such a good job
of managing the economy, you might wonder why people are not earning
more money."
And they are obviously NOT earning more money, and
in fact the lack of money is what is prompting Wal-Mart to suggest
that Congress raise the minimum wage. Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott said
that, "We can see first-hand at Wal-Mart how many of our
customers are struggling to get by. Our customers simply don't
have the money to buy basic necessities between pay checks."
Perhaps this is what prompted a witty British guy
named Jonathan P. to write that while inflation may be "tame"
to the boneheads in government, for us out here in the real world
we have "Necessinflation" which he defines as "Everything
that is ‘necessary’ to life is increasing in price.
Shelter .Energy .Food .Utilities .Medical." Hahaha! Exactly!
And it will get worse and worse because there is
no upper bound on inflation, since, as William Grigg, of the New
American Magazine, so accurately points out, "We will never
run out of zeroes." Hahahaha! Exactly! The attitude of the
Congress and the despicable Federal Reserve is "$1 today,
$100 tomorrow, $1,000 next week! Who cares? Hahahaha!"
Alert Reader Jan E. sees us laughing, and writes that he doesn't
see anything funny about this, but instead he sees "More
signs that the economy is not growing. There are more vacant stores
in my town. All of the marginal businesses are closing up. And
I, like some of your other readers, am receiving catalogs from
companies I haven't heard from in years. But the biggest sign
comes from a friend-of-a-friend who works for a company that provides
dancers for bachelor and birthday parties. He says the summer
business was flat. The worst they have seen in years. Now you
know things are bad when guys don't even have money to pay girls
to take their clothes off!" Now, that IS bad news!
This purported lack of money to spend is apparently
borne out by the report by the Commerce Department that said spending,
adjusted for inflation, fell 0.4 percent last month. And not only
do we not have any money to spend, but we are not saving any money
either, as the savings rate was less than zero- less than zero!
-for the fourth straight month in a freaking row! And it has been
falling for a decade, and hovering around this low level for years!
And it will get even worse than that, since mass
layoffs hit their highest in four years, and durable goods fell
again, this time falling 2.1% in September.
And why is this happening? Is that what you are asking me, Binky?
I'll tell you why, and without screaming at you, since I love
you so much I can refuse you nothing. This is happening because
prices are rising faster than wages. It's as simple as that!
And now you want to know, "Why is that?"
Well, before I can really get cranking with one of my patented
Mogambo screaming hissy-fits (MSHF) about inflation and how it
is a very bad thing (VBT) and how the Federal Reserve is evil
incarnate for creating all this inflation, here comes Sean Corrigan,
investment strategist at Sage Capital, who notes that "Nobel
Prize winner Elias Canetti wrote in his 1960 work, 'Masse und
Macht': 'One may say that, apart from wars and revolutions, there
is nothing in our modern civilizations that compares in importance
to [inflation]. The upheavals caused by inflations are so profound
that people prefer to hush them up and conceal them."
I patiently try to explain to Mr. Corrigan that
this is not about the actual horrors of inflation, but the audience
drowns me out by furiously chanting "Skostak! Shostak!"
Responding to the crowd, Frank Shostak explains in his essay "Is
the Fed an Inflation Fighter or Creator?" at Mises.org, that
"Once the money supply increases it sets in motion a process
of impoverishment, which also sets in motion the dreadful boom-bust
cycle."
And so I guess that the reason that Ben "Blowhard"
Bernanke is so desperate to "set in motion" another
boom-bust cycle is that we are now suffering the impoverishment
part of the whole boom-bust cycle that Mr. Shostak alludes to.
When you don’t have enough money to spend anymore, you are
impoverished.
And when people don't spend, economies don't work,
and that means that asset prices will go down, and that means
that the holders of stocks, and the holders of bonds, and the
holders of housing, and all those tens and hundreds of millions
of government parasites will suffer impoverishment, too, as everything
goes down. This is the dreaded "deflation" that Ben
"Bunghole" Bernanke is so desperate to prevent, and
rightfully so, that he is on record as saying that his policy
is to deliberate destroy our money by inflation! Which makes everything
worse! Hahaha! Welcome to the lunacy known as central banking!
Of course, what they HOPE will happen is that stocks
will increase in price (inflation in stocks) and bonds will increase
in price (inflation in bonds) and houses will increase in price
(inflation in houses) so that we can have an increase in the price
of government (inflation in government). Unfortunately, asset
targeting is almost impossible, and so all that new money will
end up as inflation in lots and lots of other things, too. In
fact, in everything.
Even more importantly, and you can tell that it
is important by the way the pathetic Mogambo weeps piteously as
his mighty Mogambo heart (MMH) breaks at the thought, the poor
(who are already impoverished) will be further impoverished by
the inflation. And if there is one thing that I am sure of, it
is that there are lots more angry, desperate poor people (with
nothing to lose) than there are rich people (trying to keep from
losing what they have), and anybody who has seen any old movies
about the French Revolution or the Russian revolution or heard
the stories of Weimar Germany instantly recognizes that nothing
good EVER comes out of further impoverishing the poor!
But we were not talking about poverty or how The
Mogambo can't afford to go out for a lousy donut and coffee anymore,
and even when he could afford it the snotty little cashier refused
to wait on me because she says I gave her "the creeps,"
but about how that miniscule decrease in Total Fed Credit was
more than made up for by foreign central banks, who bought up,
and stored at the Fed, another staggering $8 billion in US debt
last week! Eight billion! Dollars! Which was real handy because
the Treasury is now issuing new debt at breakneck speed, up almost
$100 billion in two lousy months! And up fifty billion dollars
in the last three weeks alone!
Gary North, of the newsletter Reality Check, sees my eyes bugging
out of my head about this national debt thing, and condescendingly
pats me on the head like I am an idiot (did I mention he is also
a real good judge of character?), and reassures me that this is
chicken feed. "The on-budget debt is merely the tip of the
iceberg. The off-budget debt -- mainly Medicare -- is now in excess
of $65 trillion, according to Prof. Kent Smetters, who testified
before a Congressional committee in February, 2005. In fiscal
2006, this figure will rise to $68 trillion."
Getting back to the national debt, Mr. North says
"The debt-o-meter will roll over at least once more during
the present Administration. A recession will get it to roll over
twice. I am betting on twice." So he figures that not only
will we have a recession, which means that The Mogambo will be
fired at the first opportunity in a general downsizing ("Scram,
bozo!"), but that the national debt will balloon by another
$2 trillion in three years? Yow! Yow! Yow!
- GDP was reported up at 3.8% at an annual rate,
which is actually up from last quarter, when growth was 3.3% or
something. Simultaneously, the Gross Domestic Product deflator,
which is the inflation figure that you use to discount the rise
in nominal GDP (sales in dollars), rose to 3.1%, up from 2.6%
in the previous quarter! My God! All the ethically-corrupt wonks
in Washington, working like the demons from Hell that they are,
can't find some way to keep the inflation statistics any lower
than this??? Note the use of three question marks, which is a
clever literary device I am using to indicate sneering incredulity
with a distinct undertone of contempt.
The part that makes my mouth hang open in stupefaction
and lets a rivulet of drool slide down my chin is that this means
that the 3.8% reported gain in adjusted-GDP, combined with the
3.1% deflator, means that the economy was/is growing at a nominal
6.9%? Hahahaha! Don't make me laugh! I am here to tell you that
nominal GDP is NOT growing at 6.9% AND that inflation is a hell
of a lot more than some piddly 3.1%, or even 4.7%, as is reported
in Barron's and the Economist magazine. Ergo, the real, inflation-adjusted
economy is not growing at all, and is, in fact, stagnant at best
and, even worse, is almost certainly contracting.
- We now know that the Bush administration is, officially,
the most irresponsibly profligate of any administration in living
memory, as the Cato Institute reports that "The increase
in discretionary spending — that is, all non- entitlement
programs — in Bush's first term was 48.5% in nominal terms.
That's more than twice as large as the increase in discretionary
spending during Clinton's entire two terms (21.6%), and just higher
than Lyndon Johnson's entire discretionary spending spree (48.3%)."
Bush has now allowed the increase in federal spending to exceed
even that of Lyndon Johnson, the previous record-holder, as the
most irresponsible spending dolt. But it was not just Bush, as
it was the Congress that proposed, and the White House merely
duly authorized, the jillions and gazillions of dollars in spending
(and deficit-spending) in the past few years. And that is just
the on-budget stuff! If you include the non-budget items, and
all the offshore shenanigans, and the Social-Security and Medicare
mess, then you will get a number so big (audience shouts out "How
big, Mogambo?") that you will find yourself screaming screaming
screaming in your sleep and your children will run in, dressed
in their cute little footie pajamas, and ask "What is the
matter?" and you will tell them, with tears in your eyes,
"The Mogambo was right ! We are freaking doomed!"
And of course a lot of this humongous mountain of
money found its way back to the government. Sure enough, the Treasury
reports that federal revenues rose in the last fiscal year by
14%, which translates into an additional $274 billion flowing
into the government. In case you are keeping score, corporate
taxes increased by 47%, and individual income taxes increased
by 15%. Which they spent on creating more entitlement programs!
- Robert Kiyosaki, writing and essay entitled "Why Savers
Are Losers" on Finance.Yahoo.com, says "My poor dad
believed in saving money. 'A dollar saved is a dollar earned,'
he often said. The problem was he didn't pay attention to changes
in monetary policy. All his life he saved, not realizing that
after 1971 his dollar was no longer money. You see, in 1971 President
Richard Nixon changed the rules of money. That year, the U.S.
dollar ceased being money and became a currency. This was one
of the most important changes in modern history, but few people
understand why."
Oooh! Oooh! I know this one! I raise my hand, because
I know why! It's because of the inflation that you get as a result!
So I am waving my arm around like it's caught in a damned whirlwind
and my eyes are pleading "Ask me why! Please ask me!",
but he pretends that he doesn't notice me, and so finally I yell
out "Ask me, you stupid idiot!" which was, apparently,
the wrong thing to say, as he immediately turned away from me
and went on to say "In spite of all these increases in prices,
the federal government's economists say, 'Inflation is low. It's
under control.' " Aha! So it IS about inflation, just like
I said! Feeling real smug and self-satisfied, I cross my arms
and have this stupid, smarmy grin on my stupid face as he continues,
"They are allowed to say that because the government is charged
with only monitoring inflation in consumer prices -- not asset
prices." Exactly right! So I jump up, startling the hell
out of poor Mr. Kiyosaki, and say "Exactly right! We have
had roaring inflation in stocks, and bonds, and houses, and the
size of government for freaking decades! All financed by the damned
Federal Reserve, always creating more money and more credit! But
they never talk about that! NoooOOoooo! They never want to talk
about that! They only say things like 'Go away Mogambo, you hateful
and stupid little man!' and then they send over a goon squad from
the CIA to 'talk' to me, but it never does any good, and that
is why they are all out to get me!"
At the irritating sound of my whiny voice, he looks
over at the security guards clumped around the sides of the auditorium,
makes some kind of sign with his hand, and flicks his head towards
me. I see them converging on me, and I can feel their little rat-like
eyes burning into me, and I know I should run, but I can't! I
stand spellbound as he continues "The consumer price index
(CPI) is the pressure gauge the government watches because they
want to make sure the consumer is happy finding bargains at Wal-Mart,
which is easy because China is forcing consumer prices down."
At that moment, two big, beefy stooges with their
stupid little security guard uniforms and their stupid little
security guard badges are hauling me down the hall, and I am screaming
back "Wal-Mart? You say Wal-Mart?"
So he never got a chance to hear my clever rebuttal,
but apparently this Kiyosaki guy ain't heard the news that Wal-Mart's
prices are not quite the bargain they once were!
- Lawrence Roulston of ResourceOpportunities.com
wrote on Kitco.com about his experience at a gold show, and it
was entitled "Meltdown or Muddle?" Naturally, since
I think I am so witty, I remark "Well, if it was a meltdown,
then there would be a puddle, not a muddle! Hahaha!" But
nobody laughed, as usual, and I sneer at these puny Earthlings
and how their primitive brains cannot comprehend the sublime,
subtle humor of the Mogambo (SSHOTM). After a little embarrassed
silence, Mr. Roulson finally breaks the tension by going on to
opine that the biggest concern preying on people's minds is "the
outlook for the US economy. Government debt, consumer debt, escalating
government deficits, the war in Iraq, terrorism, the wilting dollar,
and now the devastation on the Gulf Coast, are all serious issues.
But, will these factors lead to an economic collapse?"
He implies that it is easy to be like the cowardly
Mogambo, going all to pieces over this stuff and screaming that
the sky is falling and hiding under the bed in fear, but he reminds
us that "It is important to look beyond the headlines and
superficial analysis and think through these issues" and
in particular to "go back a few years and re-read the doom
and gloom forecasts from so many commentators. Granted, some of
the events that were forecast have come to pass. Yet, in spite
of the mounting difficulties, the US economy continues to grow
and prosper. It is not the level of growth that many people would
like to see, but it is a very long way from the apocalypse that
was forecast by so many."
That's right! The doom and gloomers are wrong! I
am a doom and gloomer. Ergo, with airtight Aristotelian logic
that is unassailable (and believe me I have tried), I have been,
alas, wrong. Especially about the housing boom, which I missed
completely because I made the same mistake that is so common amongst
us out here on the edges of reality and sanity, and I am talking
us poor, pathetic creatures who can barely contain our fear and
anger and fear (which I mention twice because it is central to
my new legal defense), and sense of sheer panic, so that we can't
sleep, and haven't slept for weeks and weeks because it is freaking
us out so bad, and now we are paranoid and insane with, as I indicated
previously, fear.
And we are wrong because we doom-and-gloomers always make the
same big mistake (SBM) that we always make. In fact, it is SO
common (audience shouts out "How common, Mogambo?")
that it even has a name: Same Big Stupid Mogambo Mistake, which
is usually referred to by its acronym, SBSMM in the official literature.
And if SBSMM is NOT mentioned in any official literature that
you read, then that proves that they are censoring what you are
reading, and that they ARE out to get me. And you, too!
But this is not about how I am a paranoid lunatic, but about making
mistakes. So what IS this big mistake, this SBSMM? The big mistake
is: We always completely underestimate the government's response!
And there is ALWAYS going to be a government response, because
when something goes bad, or starts going bad, or may start going
bad, or is not going good, or is not going good enough, then there
is ALWAYS a government response!
And if you are at all familiar with the results of previous government
responses (total failures) then you know why we doom-and-gloomers
are so doomy-and-gloomy, and always will be, too.
For example, Jim Puplava, speaking on his Financial Sense Newshour,
does not mention the fact that nobody is as doomy or as gloomy
as I, but he does demonstrate that he is hip to the government-response
thing. He says, "We will put price caps on energy. We will
put windfall profits tax into effect. We will raise taxes. We’ll
raise interest rates. We will increase government interference
in the economy. In other words, we will add all the wrong ingredients
to the bonfire and make the fire grow. Unfortunately, that is
the lesson of history."
- The Economist magazine writes "A central
bank cannot prevent oil prices giving a one-off boost to inflation,
but it can try to prevent this feeding into higher wages and prices.
To ensure that the rise in inflation is only temporary, central
banks need to increase interest rates at least in line with inflation.
If central banks hold interest rates unchanged as inflation rises,
this would imply lower real rates and hence an easing of monetary
policy."
I jump to my feet and exclaim, "And this is exactly what
we are seeing, dudes!" They go on like they didn't hear me,
but notice how they steal my thunder when they say "Global
monetary policy is still unusually lax by historical standards.
In America, despite 11 increases in interest rates since June
2004, real rates are still negative and below any reasonable notion
of the 'neutral rate of interest' at which monetary policy is
neither stimulating nor restraining the economy. In other words,
the Fed will need to keep pushing up interest rates into 2006."
Well, this morning they raised the Fed Funds rate by another quarter
of a percent for the twelfth time in a row, so maybe the Economist
knows what it is talking about, unlike the stupid Mogambo!
But did they say "unusually lax"? Hahahaha!
I would have said "preposterously low" or "insanely
low" or "stupidly low" or "pounded down to
almost insignificance by a bunch of brain-damaged weenies at the
Federal Reserve as they desperately try and extricate the economy
from the ruination and damnation inflicted on it by these same
Federal Reserve morons, what Aubie Baltin, PhD, derisively calls
"Socialist Neoclassical economists", who ruined our
money with their ridiculous and stupid economic theories which
have been discredited over and over and over again." But
I can see how this is too wordy, so let's stick with their terse
"unusually lax."
But it is not just us Americans suffering from inflation! Interest
rates are rising around the world, as one country after another
is being forced to do something about inflation in prices, which
is what always comes after an inflation in the money supply, which
they are all STILL encouraging! This is bad, bad news (BBN) for
two reasons that I can think of without thinking or getting up
off my lazy butt, which suits me fine: 1) Financing the purchase
of anything gets more and more expensive, and 2) all the hundreds
of millions and billions of people who bought any American debt,
any of that immense ocean of debt that we have issued over the
last few decades, are now looking at losses, and they will incur
more and more losses for a long, long time into the future (because
bond prices fall as interest rates rise) until interest rates
stop rising, and these people are going to be angry every minute
of every day as they watch their wealth melt away. So they are
sitting on losses, both real AND incipient, made all the more
huge and overwhelming by the amount of leverage that they used
to buy the bonds in the first damned place!
I am not worried about the Europeans getting angry,
or the Japanese. It is the Chinese that I am worried about, as
I have seen too many Kung Fu movies not to know that when you
have a lot of Asians around, sooner or later there is going to
be a lot of fighting, hands and feet flying around, punching and
kicking the hell out of everybody and everything, and you had
better know what you are doing when mixing it up with those dudes!
Already the Chinese consume half of the cement used in the world,
a third of all the coal used in the world, 40% of the world's
steel, a fifth of the world's copper and aluminum. And they also
make half of the world's shoes, most of the video games that are
rotting our brains out, 80% of all the toys sold in America, and
most of everything else you can name, from cell phones to computers
and furniture and beyond!
As further proof, The Mogambo notes from deep within his secret
bunker way out in the spooky and haunted woods that these Chinese
guys are going to have a strong currency and we are going to have
a weak one, and they are going to have a lot of rich and middle-class
Chinese people with money to burn, and they are going to want
a lot more things that taste good. And that takes farmland, and
that means that foreign nationals are going to, as I figure it,
come over here and buy up all the farmland with their strong currency,
sort of like the US used to do back in the days when we were younger
and stronger and had a mighty currency, and we strode around buying
up whole swaths of land and resources anywhere we wanted to in
the whole world, and kicked the local population off the land
or made virtual slaves of them, if we could, and used the land
and resources to make stuff for us Americans, to the impoverishment
of the indigenous population, and we laughed at them "Hahahaha!
We are the Yankee, capitalist-pig exploiters of your environment
and your stupid economy!"
So I am predicting, in that fearless-yet-foolish way that is always
my downfall and dismay, that cropland in the USA will be, one
of these days, enormously expensive.
And there may be some divine retribution in there somewhere, as
alert reader Richard P. quotes Morris Cerullo, the president of
World Evangelism, as saying that a coming world-wide financial
crisis "will be so long and so severe that even the rich,
who are usually exempt from such things, will be affected."
Even more surprisingly, and the reason I bring this up, is that
he has also predicted that "wars in the future will be over
farmland and not oil fields."
- Mike Shedlock of GunsAndGunpowder.com is still
concerned about the problems at General Motors, and rhetorically
asks "Is that the extent of GM's problems?" Well, since
he asked, I was going to casually mention that 1) I obviously
don’t know what "rhetorically" means, and 2) I
have written extensively to both GM and Ford about naming a snazzy
new car after me, maybe something like the "Mogambo Supercar
Supreme-o." But I never heard from them, and they did not
snap up the generous Mogambo offer (GMO), which proves that THEY
were idiots, NOT me, as so rudely alleged in most of their civil
cases against me, nuisance lawsuits initiated so that I would
stop bothering them about the Mogambo Supercar, which they deny
the existence of TO THIS DAY! I mean, I tell Mr. Shedlock to call
General Motors up on his cell phone and ask GM about the Mogambo
Supercar, and they will say "What in the hell are you talking
about?" which will PROVE it's true!
But apparently Mr. Shedlock has heard this story
before, and ignores my challenge. Instead, he elects to say "Let's
summarize all of the problems I can think of off the top of my
head: 1. Falling sales. 2. Enormous debt. 3. Union strife. 4.
Delphi and supplier problems. 5. Cost disadvantages versus Toyota
to the tune of several thousand dollars per car 6. Poor management.
7. Poor quality versus foreign competition.8. Lack of industry
vision. 9. Medical benefit problems. 10. Pension woes."
So I am standing there, waiting for him to at least
MENTION the whole Mogambo Supercar tragedy, and what a fiasco
it was, and how it is I who is the real victim here, and not the
bunch of incompetent boneheads running the joint, and not the
equally incompetent boneheads who kept buying GM and Ford stocks
and bonds, and using these stocks and bonds(and forgive me for
turning away, but I cannot help but laugh at the sublime Theater
of the Absurd humor, even in the face of such a profound tragedy)
to fund their own retirements! Hahahaha!
And far be it from me to mention that Ford ruined
both the Mustang and the Thunderbird, and General Motors ruined
the Firebird and the Oldsmobile, so what in the hell can you expect
from losers like that?
- Alert reader Norman Z sent me the note that David Dodge, who
is the chief honcho dude at the Bank of Canada (the Canadian central
bank), supposedly said "The world should expect an abrupt
and disorderly economic correction in (by) 2007." Now, I
cannot verify this report, but I say that I could not agree more,
which I cleverly indicate by saying "I could not agree more."
And if you want to see what happens to the price of gold when
"an abrupt and disorderly economic correction" happens,
then you are about to get a real lesson.
Nick Chase, author of The Contrarian's View newsletter, has a
warm place in my heart because not only does he have nothing good
to say about Ben "Bonkers" Bernanke, the new chairman
of the Federal Reserve, but he is also very hip to what the ramifications
are of so much money and credit being created. As another feather
in his cap, he also agrees with Mr. Dodge, in that "In 2006
will come the hangover after the party.... the bear market will
return with a vengeance."
- The Gold Report reports "Dubai wants to be the Switzerland
of the Arab world and a world financial center. So they're doing
the smart thing." As evidence of that, they note that Dubai
will "launch a gold futures exchange on Nov 22, with South
Africa’s Standard Bank among 50 founding members. Gold and
silver options contracts would be launched in the first quarter
of 2006."
- Bob Wood, of Kaizen Managed Assets reported that
Jim Cramer, the manic stock picker on his own CNBC television
show called Mad Money, "has deftly staked out positions on
both sides of the debate. While pounding the table on his own
show every day for which stocks he wants you to buy right now,
I caught his appearance on the Colbert Report. Cramer said he
was a long term bear on the domestic stock markets. You read that
right. He's bearish long term on U.S. stocks."
- To show you the arrogance and intellectual impoverishment
of business in America, get a load of this: "Auto supplier
Delphi Corp. said Friday it has beefed up severance packages for
top executives in order to encourage them to stay on as the company
prepares for a major restructuring that could include bankruptcy."
Hahahaha! These are the same guys who mismanaged the company into
the toilet, but they are giving themselves more money to encourage
themselves to not run away like rats deserting the ship, even
as the employees, retirees, stockholders and bondholders are in
the process of being screwed royally! Hahahaha! Delphi could have
saved itself the money, as who in the hell would hire any of these
blockheads anyway? Hahahaha!
- Bill Murphy of LeMetropooeCafe.com is really suspicious of the
action in gold here lately. He says "The Gold Cartel knows
their ill-conceived scheme to manipulate and suppress the price
of gold is going down. The price of gold is going to take off
in the months and years ahead." So the way to capitalize
on this slimy mess is to buy gold whenever the price is manipulated
lower like this. I will point out, in case you are wondering,
that this strategy has worked like a charm for years, and everybody
who bought when the price inexplicably fell like this made a nice
profit when the price of gold subsequently rebounded, as it always
does nowadays. And I am pretty damned sure that it will continue
working like a charm, too.
The surprising thing is that Mr. Murphy says that
the guys on the Comex "have rarely ever seen anything like
it", but that Goldman Sachs, alone, is doing all the monster
selling that took gold down so dramatically here lately.
And Mr. Murphy sees the Bush Administration in this mess up to
their eyeballs, as the White House knows that "If the US
stock and real estate markets go against them in a significant
way, they know they are done for", and a rising gold price
is always seen as a reason to sell stocks and bonds and houses.
Ergo, White House complicity in rigging the gold market!
- From Doug Noland we learn that there is plenty of inflation
out there to rattle the nerves of the faint-of-heart (me). He
writes "For the week, the CRB index was little changed, with
y-t-d gains of 13.5%. The Goldman Sachs Commodities index rose
0.3%, increasing 2005 gains to 40.1%."
And price increases are getting more ubiquitous
too, as Mr. Noland remarks that "The National Association
for Business Economics did their quarterly survey of members,
and they report that their index of prices charged by member companies
rose to the second-highest in the survey’s whole 24-year
history.”
And it doesn't stop there, as the Commerce Department's
latest PCE price index of inflation, which is the inflation measure
supposedly favored by Alan "Jerkface" Greenspan, shot
up 0.9 percent last month. Apparently this is the largest biggest
rise in that index since February 1981, 24 freaking years ago.
But, you will be glad to know, that if you exclude
food and energy, then the index only advanced a mere 0.2 percent.
Hahahaha! To show you how far removed from reality this stupid
PCE number is, over the past year it has risen just two lousy
2 percent! Hahaha! Prices have increased just two percent in the
last year? Hahahaha! And this is Greenspan's favorite inflation
indicator? With an idiot like that in charge of the Federal Reserve,
now you know why I say that we are freaking doomed! Ugh.
****Mogambo sez: These temporary low prices for oil and precious
metals are your chance to walk over and pick up some bargains,
as all the things that are bedeviling us and our stupidly over-priced
currency are not going to get better, but they are going to get
worse and worse and worse. From the Financial Times we read "The
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development forecast
warned that the continued deterioration of the US current account
deficit posed a risk to the US and to the global economy, at a
time when the US deficit has risen above 6 per cent of gross domestic
product and is forecast to rise to 7 per cent of GDP next year."
If this doesn’t seem important to you, then
perhaps it will after they go on to say, "Few other OECD
countries have ever managed to sustain imbalances of that magnitude
without eventually experiencing sharp downward pressure on the
value of their currencies.”
That means that the price of oil, gold and
silver will be pressured to rise and rise and rise for the rest
of your life, as the dollar will continue to fall and fall in
value for the rest of your life. And since you can buy oil and
precious metals cheaply right now, thanks to these obvious manipulations
of the market, buy them all, and rejoice at your good luck! Whee!
Richard Daughty, the angriest guy in economics
9241 54th Street North
Pinellas Park, FL 33782
727 546 5568
e-mail: scgcjs@gte.net
|