|
|
| A Healthy, Normal Correction |
| |
Newsletter writers Pamela
and Mary Anne Aden are well-known for their monthly publication,
The Aden Forecast. Pamela Aden shares her thoughts with us
on what she sees as a healthy, normal correction.
TGR: In your March update, you mention that the gold has been
declining since January 9th in what you call a “D”
decline. Today the gold price is about $404. So I wanted to
ask you to define the term for us, and then ask where you
think we are with this D decline.
PA: D declines tend to be the worst declines in the cycle.
But in a bull market its low will be higher than the prior
“B” low, which was last July’s low near
$343. The 65-week moving average is the key trend, which means
the current decline should hold above $370. D declines tend
to last 9 to 12 weeks, so we could see a low at any time.
The decline will be over when gold closes and stays above
$405. Overall, the D decline has been mild. It’s just
correcting the sharp rise, when gold rose almost nonstop from
last July to January, with silver doing even better. Silver
is currently hitting new highs and it may be leading gold
out of the decline.
TGR: You think this is still a long-term bull market, and
what we’re experiencing is just a healthy, normal correction.
PA: Definitely.
TGR: So are you advising investors today to wait until we
know whether there will be a further decline, or to buy gold
and silver stocks now?
PA: I think the safest and best way is to average in. If we
had a full downward correction, of course, it would be ideal
to buy near the low, but we may not get one. And for that
reason, it’s healthy to average in. My advice is to
take advantage of weakness, or just average in on a regular
basis during this weak period.
TGR: Have you read Ian McAvity’s latest report where
he says that he sees prices going lower in 2004, that we will
have a bigger correction? And that we’re probably not
going to resume the upside until 2005?
PA: I suppose that’s a possibility. What’s interesting
is that the coming months are going to be the moment of truth
for gold. If the pricing trends mirror the movements of the
‘80s and ‘90s, then what we’ve had so far
fits right in. If we see something more in line with the ‘70s
surging bull market, then we have several years to go –
say five or six years for the bull market. So it’s very
important to see if the bull market is going to stay intact,
and everything points to the fact that it will. When you just
look at the fundamental factors around the world, and you
look at the reality of the situation in the U.S., everything
just seems to be pointing to the fact that we’re going
to have an upside. What is clear is that we’re not living
in ordinary times.
What Ian seems to be saying is that we could see a sideways,
but not necessarily a bear market this year, before we start
getting into the full bull market. This could be a decade-long
bull market, which started three years ago.
But we have our indicators and we are watching them closely.
The 65-week moving averages works very well in identifying
the major trends, so that’s one indicator that we place
importance on. Right now it is at $370, and it’s moving
up. As long as gold stays above that, the major trend is up.
The intermediate move are also important, because many times
they will tell us if the market, on a major trend basis, is
getting tired or not. So far, the steps are in place. The
bull market is underway and we’re seeing a consolidation
secondary trend that looks like it’s nearing an end.
TGR: You have also pointed out how the trends over these next
few months will help us see whether we are in a market similar
to that of the ‘80s and ‘90s – which means
the gold price would top out at some point – or if this
current market is more like the ‘70s market, which ended
in 1979 or 1980, with gold hitting $800.
PA: Yes, in fact I just created a chart that overlaid the
current bull market so far, compared to the bull market of
the ‘70s — indexed to 100 — to compare the
percentage growth of this bull market to the ‘70s. You
see gold moving very similarly to how it did in the early
‘70s.

At this point in the bull market in the ‘70s, gold was
a bit higher than it is now. But really the movements are
very similar, and it’s interesting and exciting to see
whether that’s the type of upside potential we can look
forward to over the next five to seven years. And yes, I think
we’re in a bull market. We could have some months of
boredom, months of consolidation, but that’s all part
of it. As long as the major trend is up, and the intermediate
trends are bullish, we’re staying with it, and we think
it has a lot further to go.
TGR: What about silver? You’ve said that it’s
better than gold – you actually even wrote that as a
subhead, “Silver Better than Gold.” Can you talk
a little bit about the factors that you think have gone into
silver’s activity?
PA: Silver rose 45% just from October to March. Silver tends
to be a sleeper but once it wakes up, it soars. This means
if silver now stays above its recent March 2nd high at $6.91,
it’ll be in a position to soar. Then if it closes above
its 1998 high near $7.30, it could rise to the 1987 high near
$9.50. These are the numbers we’re watching on the upside.
The fundamentals have been very favorable for silver for many
years. And they are perhaps even more favorable now than they
were a couple of years ago, when you consider the industrial
side of silver.
Silver is stronger than gold. So we’re recommending
more silver than gold. We like silver coins and silver shares
such as Silver Standard, Coeur d’Alene and Pan American.
These are our favorites.
TGR: Do you see gold and silver moving in tandem, with the
potential for a correction, or just sideways movement, in
both? Or do you see silver having more strength?
PA: Well, so far, we haven’t really had a correction
in silver. It’s overbought but it could stay overbought
while silver keeps rising. It hasn’t even wanted to
break a five-week moving average, which means silver is very
strong above $6.50.
TGR: Could you talk now about some of the gold shares you
recommend? Among the larger companies, I see that you like
Newmont, Anglo Gold, Barrick, Glamis, Golden Star, and Placer
Dome, just to name a few. Which ones do you especially like
right now?
PA: I always like Newmont for a core position and knowing
that probably when mainstream investors start buying more,
they’re going to buy that one.
TGR: Now, when you say, “mainstream” I assume
you mean the average investor?
PA: Yes, the average investor hasn’t even really started
coming in at all. When gold becomes more popular, when it
starts gaining more attention, Newmont is going to benefit
from that.
TGR: What are some of the other gold stocks that you like?
PA: Cambior has been doing well. We also like Glamis Gold
and Placer. Two funds that have been doing well are: the US
Global Gold Share Fund and the Global Resource Fund and of
course, we like gold coins.
(3/10/04)
***
Visit Streetwise-The GOLD Report - www.theaureport.com – a unique, free site
featuring summaries of articles from major publications, specific
recommendations from top worldwide analysts and portfolio
managers covering gold stocks, and a directory, with samples,
of precious metals newsletters.
To subscribe, please complete our online form,
or send an email with the word 'Subscribe' in the subject
field to subscriptions@theaureport.com.
Streetwise - The GOLD Report is Copyright ©
2004 by Streetwise Inc. All rights are reserved. Streetwise
Inc. hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate
this copyrighted material only in whole (and always including
this disclaimer), but never in part. The GOLD Report does
not render investment advice and does not endorse or recommend
the business, products, services or securities of any company
mentioned in this report.
From time to time, Streetwise Inc. directors,
officers, employees or members of their families may have a
long or short position in securities mentioned and may make
purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market
or otherwise. Streetwise Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy
or thoroughness of the information reported. |