|
|
| Gold at $400 an Ounce is Dirt Cheap |
| |
I believe gold (and very probably silver) will
make fortunes for those who now take major positions in the
precious metals. . .
So this is my position — I believe gold
below and even somewhat above 400 dollars an ounce is dirt
cheap. In view of the amount of Fed-generated fiat paper that
will have to be churned out in coming years (it will be in
the multi-trillions of dollars), gold is the cheapest thing
around. The U.S. government, states, cities, corporations
and individuals are currently loaded with $32 trillion in
debt. On top of that, the U.S. government has additional unfunded
liabilities of around $44 trillion, all of which will have
to be financed.
For these reasons, it’s my thesis that
gold at $400 an ounce is ridiculously cheap. As a comparison,
gold today is less than half the price it was at its 1980
high.
I believe three or four or five years from now
we’ll look back at today’s price of $400 dollar
gold and ask ourselves, “Where the devil were we? What
were we thinking about? Gold at $400 was cheaper than dirt.
What didn’t we recognize this back in the year 2003?”
As I see it, this is one of those rare times
in an investor’s life when he can buy an undervalued
asset at a bargain price. This is a time when you can buy
real money with fiat paper. At this time you can buy real
money, gold, with “junk” fiat paper which is created
“out of thin air” by the Federal Reserve.
Big profits have already been made by those
who bought gold and gold shares two or three years ago. But
that is nothing compared with what I see ahead — as
the bull market in gold moves on. We are now in the accumulation
phase of the gold bull market, This is the phase where seasoned,
knowledgeable investors build their positions — even
while the public and most neophyte “investors”
are either ignorant of what’s happening or at a time
when the public actually dislikes the very product which could
make them a future fortune.
But the secret to all this is the necessity
to ACT. Knowledge is wonderful, but in this business, knowledge
isn’t worth a damn unless you have the courage to “pull
the trigger” — to ACT. . . (November 15, 2003)
Here's my "take" on the big picture. As I see it,
the primary trend of the stock market turned from bear to
bull in 1974 and the great bull market continued in force
until 1999-2000. Why do I put the bull trend that long? I
do so because every bull market ends with a frothy, wildly-speculative
third phase, and I don't believe the bull market that started
in 1974 really saw a true speculative third phase ending until
1996 to 2000. That wild, frothy period ended the bull market.
If I'm correct on the above, then we experienced
a bull market that lasted a record 26 years. Most bear markets
tend to last a third to half as long as the preceding bull
market. That suggests to me that the bear market that began
in 1999 (1999 according to Dow Theory) should last eight to
13 years, or as a guess maybe about a decade. That could take
the current primary bear market to around the year 2010, give
or take a few years.
How about the manipulations of the Fed, won't
those manipulations extend the bear market? My answer is that
I really don't know, but I suspect that they will. In re-inflating
the bubble to the best of their ability, the Fed has introduced
many new excesses into the economy. Ultimately, I believe
those excesses will result in a worse bear market than would
otherwise have been the case.
Let me put it in Dow Theory terms. We went through
the most speculative bull market third phase in stock market
history. The years 1996 to 2000 took stocks to overvaluation
levels that have never been seen before. In fact even now,
following the most flagrant Fed manipulation in U.S. history,
stocks are still chronically overvalued with the S&P selling
at 30 times trailing earnings while yielding a piddling 1.70
percent.
The end result of all this will, in my opinion,
result in the worst bear market third phase since 1932. Values
at the final bear market lows will be as outrageously low
as values were outrageously high during 1996 to 2000.
At any rate, this is the voyage for the markets
and the economy that I see coming up over the next decade
or perhaps even longer. The pain on this trip will be very
high and the cost will be huge. But we've been enjoying a
fabulous party for decades, and over coming years we and our
children will have to deal with the extended hangover.
How do we protect ourselves against the coming
hard times brought on by the bear? My only thought, and I've
thought about this a lot, is real money -- gold. Gold, the
metal, is the rock-solid island of safety. Secondarily, we
have the gold stocks, which have the leverage, but also more
of the potential risks.
The question is asked, "What else can I
do or buy in this long bear market that you are talking about?
I wish I had some brilliant answers to that
question. I guess the first thing that occurs to me is that
you might buy some investments in currencies other than the
dollar. It seems to be that the euro is fated to be a major
competitor (let's call it an alternative) to the dollar. I've
suggested this before but I'll repeat it -- I bought short-term
German government notes denominated in euros. . .
Next I want to talk about silver. The world
is using more silver now than is being mined. The U.S. government
stock of silver is gone, and whatever silver is needed has
to be bought from above-ground sources.
Silver hit a low of 3.51 back in 1993. From
there silver advanced to 6.16 in May of 1995. Down went silver
to 4.15 in July 1997. Then came the big rally to 7.40 in February
of 1998. From there silver sank to a low of 4.11 in November
of 2001.
All of which brings us to the present. Silver,
like gold, is now on the move. In July, 2003 the 30-month
moving average of silver broke above the 40-month MA of silver.
That confirmed, for me, that silver was in a primary bull
market.
To take it even closer, back in June of this
year silver broke above its 200-day MA. On July 2 silver broke
above its 50-day MA. Dec. silver rose to a high of 5.39 on
September 25, then corrected sharply lower. Last week Dec.
silver surged to a new closing high of 5.41, then backed off.
This morning Dec. silver is selling at 5.33.
In the "old days" an ounce of gold
would buy 15 ounces of silver. Over the years that changed,
and on average since WW II an ounce of gold would buy 35 ounces
of silver. But by September 1992 silver was so out of favor
that an ounce of gold would buy 92 ounces of silver. The ratio
changed drastically and by March of 1998 an ounce of gold
would buy 46 ounces of silver.
Taking it to the present, in May of 2003
an ounce of gold would buy a whopping 80 ounces of silver.
By July an ounce of gold would buy 67 ounces of silver. This
morning one ounce of gold will buy 74.45 ounces of silver.
Russell opinion -- silver is too cheap compared with gold,
and in turn gold is just plain too cheap -- period. (November
18, 2003)

Visit Streetwise-The GOLD Report - www.theaureport.com – a unique, free site
featuring summaries of articles from major publications, specific
recommendations from top worldwide analysts and portfolio
managers covering gold stocks, and a directory, with samples,
of precious metals newsletters.
To subscribe, please complete our online form,
or send an email with the word 'Subscribe' in the subject
field to subscriptions@theaureport.com.
Streetwise - The
GOLD Report is Copyright © 2003 by Streetwise Inc. All
rights are reserved. Streetwise Inc. hereby grants an unrestricted
license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material
only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but
never in part. The GOLD Report does not render investment
advice and does not endorse or recommend the business, products,
services or securities of any company mentioned in this report.
From time to time,
Streetwise Inc. directors, officers, employees or members
of their families may have a long or short position in securities
mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities
in the open market or otherwise.
Streetwise Inc. does
not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information
reported.
|