|
Fundamental Review
by Jim Puplava
The bull market in gold and silver has barely
begun. It is still in its infancy as gold and silver move
into their rightful role as real money. Unlike the
last bull market of the 1970s where gold and silver were
plentiful, this bull market is being driven by scarcity
and the debasement of currencies around the globe.
Gold and silver have been running supply
deficits for well over a decade. According to the work done
by GATA the gold vaults at central banks are now half empty.
Over the last decade, through gold sales, gold loans and
gold swaps, gold has flowed steadily out of the vaults of
central banks reducing large stockpiles of gold.
In the case of silver, supply is now at critical
levels. Just as central banks have dishoarded over half
of their gold inventory, aboveground stockpiles of silver
have been eroded to critical levels as a result of 14 years
of supply deficits. Those 14 years of supply deficits are
now starting to impact the markets as the price of silver
goes parabolic.
While the memory of the last gold and silver bull
market is rather faint, today’s professional investor and
gold mining company would do well to revisit that market.
During the last bull market, the price of silver rose from
$1.32 an ounce to as high as $50 an ounce with the Hunts
trying to corner the silver market.
Factor 1: Trade Deficit
The price of gold rose from its Bretton Wood
price of $35 an ounce to $850. Gold and silver, which had
been regulated and suppressed, rose like a Phoenix from
the ashes assuming its historical role as money. The 1970s
was a period of an expanding money supply, escalating government
budget deficits and dollar debasement. Over three decades
later we now find ourselves in the same predicament. However,
the fundamentals of the gold and silver markets are far
more favorable today for three specific reasons. In addition
to an expanding money supply, we now must add America’s
monstrous trade deficits which are putting vast amounts
of dollars into foreign hands.

Factor 2: Dwindling Stockpiles
A second factor that will influence this
new bull market in the precious metals is that supply is
far more limited at a time that markets are far more integrated
and larger in scope and size. This means that demand factors
could send prices to levels never seen or dreamed before.
Silver prices above $150 an ounce and gold prices of $3,000-$5,000
are not out of line. This may seem unrealistic to many,
but I strongly believe that this is where we are headed.
Silver stockpiles are dwindling each year. The U.S. government’s
stockpile of 2 billion ounces is gone. Dealer inventories
are minimal and it is getting harder and harder to acquire
or take delivery on large orders of silver.
Silver has been depressed by large short
positions. Today commercial hedgers, speculators, and small
traders are short 106,877 contracts, representing 534 million
ounces of silver short. Long positions are of equal size.
The problem is there is nowhere near this amount of silver
held on the COMEX for delivery nor are aboveground stockpiles
this large. There may be additional ounces of silver available
in the form of jewelry, silverware, and coin in existence,
but it can’t be mobilized by exchange officials to meet
delivery if it is demanded. In essence the short sellers
are trapped if the longs demand delivery, which may be one
reason why exchange officials have raised margins on silver.
In summary a major factor going forward in this new bull
market will be the supply of available gold and silver to
meet growing worldwide demand. In simple economic terms
growing demand and dwindling supply means higher prices.
Factor 3: The Danger in Derivatives
Another factor that could influence the gold
and silver markets is the precarious condition of our financial
markets. During the 1970s gold and silver bull market, the
derivative market was just in its formative stage. Derivatives
began to grow in size after 1973 as a result of the work
of three economists- Fisher Black, Myron Scholes, and Robert
Merton. The Black–Scholes model enabled investors to determine
how much a call-option is worth at any given time. The combination
of this model along with probability theory caused the derivatives
market to explode. Today it is estimated that the worldwide
market of derivatives is between $125-$150 trillion. The
U.S. banking system has increased its derivative position
from $10 trillion to $67 trillion over the last decade.
Derivatives, as Warren Buffett has described them, are financial
weapons of mass destruction capable of taking down and destroying
the global financial system. If the derivative market implodes
as I think it will eventually, the financial markets will
cease to exist in their present form. Investors and speculators
will be looking for a safe haven. Gold and silver represent
the only available safe haven that isn’t a liability. As
much as fiat paper money advocates have tried to discredit
gold and silver as money, they can’t fight the tide of history.
Gold and silver have outlived every single fiat money system
ever erected by kings, emperors, prime ministers, presidents,
or any central bank. Gold and silver are the only real form
of money that has ever existed, a point that is irrefutable
in history.
These three factors, an out-of-control U.S.
trade deficit, dwindling stockpiles of gold and silver,
and an expanding derivative market on the verge of imploding
are what will make this new bull market in gold and silver
go to levels never imagined before. I don’t believe there
is an analyst, economist or investor who can quantify today
how high this market in gold and silver will take us. All
that an investor needs to grasp is the fact that demand
is growing and getting larger by the day, while supplies
and stockpiles shrink globally.
The Race to Replace
This brings me back to the issue of supply.
Supply comes from mines and the production of gold and silver
is falling and will fall even further in the years ahead.
The last phase of the bear market in gold and silver in
the mid-nineties led to mass consolidation within the gold
industry. Today’s behemoth’s such as AngloGold, Barrick,
Newmont, Goldfields, Placer Dome, and Harmony Gold are a
bi-product of that consolidation. According to the chief
executive of one of the largest consolidators AngloGold's
Bobby Godsell, “It is the end of big picture gold consolidation;
there is no compelling logic to combining anymore. The real
challenge now is how to replace your ounces for the future.”
The race to replace ounces is about to begin. It will
take the form of takeovers of small producers with long
reserve lives and high quality junior mining companies with
large in ground reserves that can be mined economically.
The majors have problems. They not only have to replace
their reserves, but also their existing reserve base is
becoming more costly to mine. In South Africa, up to recently
the largest producer of gold in the world, the South African
producers have missed out on all of the gains of this new
bull market. SA producers have seen their cost go up each
year in Rand, while their revenues have receded thanks to
the fall in the dollar. Their costs keep going up in Rand,
while their product sales decline in dollars. The gold price
has risen by close to 33% in dollars over the last two years.
The problem for South African producers is that the price
of gold has fallen by 15% in Rand terms. The result is that
earnings have plummeted, buffeted by higher costs and falling
prices. In addition to impacting SA production costs, an
appreciating Rand is also impacting reserve calculations
as shown in the two tables below:
|
PRODUCTION AND COSTS FOR CALENDAR 2003 |
| |
Anglo Gold |
Avgold |
Durban Deep |
Gold Fields |
Harmony |
| Total Gold (koz) |
5,616 |
382 |
852 |
4,196 |
3,332 |
| SA gold (%) |
58 |
100 |
80 |
68 |
87 |
| Price: R/kg |
87,826 |
80,297 |
87,922 |
88,260 |
87,251 |
| US$/oz |
363 |
318 |
366 |
363 |
363 |
| Cash Cost: R/kg |
55,442 |
49,081 |
84,097 |
64,630 |
75,039 |
| US$/oz |
229 |
200 |
348 |
267 |
313 |
| Production Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
| R/kg |
65,703 |
69,924 |
na |
73,471 |
na |
| US$/oz |
272 |
285 |
na |
304 |
na |
|
*
Western Areas' results not published at time
of going to press.
Source: WorldGold February 2004 |
|
COMPANY ORE RESERVES |
| |
Date |
Gold Price Used (R/kg) |
Mt |
Grade
g/t |
Gold
Moz |
% of total
company
in SA |
| AngloGold |
31-12-02 |
109,700 |
720 |
3.1 |
72.3 |
66% |
| Avgold |
30-06-03 |
106,000 |
21 |
5.9 |
3.9 |
100% |
| Durban Deep |
30-06-03 |
96,000 |
179 |
3.0 |
15.5 |
98% |
| Gold Fields |
30-06-03 |
95,000 |
292 |
7.5 |
70.4 |
87% |
| Harmony |
30-06-03 |
93,000 |
378 |
5.1 |
61.9 |
98% |
| West. Areas |
31-12-02 |
67,520 |
106 |
8.4 |
28.7 |
100% |
| Source: WorldGold February 2004 |
The problem on the supply
side is that the cost structure for many of the world’s
largest gold mining region and miners have gone up, while
the price of product sales have gone down. The emerging
trend over the next few years is one of declining production
for the world’s largest producers of gold and silver. This
is backed by the fact that gold production per share for
the Majors such as Newmont, Barrick and AngloGold have fallen
from 6.4 ounces per share in 2000 to 4.2 ounces per share
in 2003. Current production trends indicate that production
will fall back to 2000 levels, while the number of shares
outstanding has increased substantially.
|
Shares Outstanding (in millions) |
| |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
| Newmont |
191.6 |
192.22 |
195.06 |
372.98 |
413.72 |
| Placer Dome |
329.70 |
327.60 |
327.90 |
350.40 |
409.30 |
| Barrick Gold |
410.0 |
548.00 |
538.00 |
541.0 |
539.0 |
Major Problems
While gold sales have improved for very few
large producers (VLGP’s), the exception being Newmont which
has reduced its hedge book substantially, most producers
have seen lower sales prices when viewed in terms of domiciled
currencies. In addition to lower dollar prices for gold
SG&A (selling, general & administrative) costs have
been rising sharply. Exploration costs are also going up
as a result of two factors: inflating material and labor
costs and lower ore grades. For many of the majors the cream
in ore ounces has already been mined. Evidence indicates
that ore bodies for the majors are in decline.
What this means is that the majors are going
to have to go out and replace their reserves. They can do
this in one of two ways: either go out and find new ore
deposits (which can take considerable time) or go out and
buy ore deposits in the ground. The problem with going out
and exploring for gold and silver is that the lead time
from discovery to production can take as long as 5-7 years,
depending where the gold is discovered. In North America
the lead time keeps increasing in length due to environmental
restrictions and regulations. This does not help in the
short run, so buying ounces that already exist in the ground
is one of the few viable alternatives.
The problem for the majors is that they have
missed the first leg of the gold bull market. They have
stood aside and let share prices get away from them. What
the majors have done is to focus on capital reconstruction
and the repair of damaged balance sheets as a result of
the acquisitions made during the 90’s and depressed prices
from the last phase of the bear market. The rush of capital
has been more to the benefit of companies than it has been
shareholders.
Junior Discoveries Shine
During the bear market of the last decade
majors could purchase juniors at a price of $25-$30 per
ounce in the ground. The price of gold was depressed and
after the Bre-X scandal, juniors were merely trying to survive.
The days of $25-$30 per ounce in the ground are gone forever.
Gold isn’t going back to $255 again, so $25-$30 gold is
a pipedream. What we are more likely to see in the future
is $100 an ounce for gold in the ground. Even higher prices
will be realized for high quality reserves that can be mined
at an economical cost. There are simply no other alternatives
outside making new elephant size discoveries similar to
the Hemlo, Grasberg, Yanacocha mines. The odds of discovering
a Hemlo each and every year are not impossible, but more
likely improbable. The majors are going to have few
choices outside the junior mining arena because that is
where all the new gold and silver deposits reside. It has
been the junior mining sector which has been both nimble
and successful with the drill bit. The juniors have been
doing most of the discovery work, while the majors have
sat back and acted more like finance companies, a situation
that is very similar to what is going on in the oil and
gas industry.
Unless the majors are willing to act soon
(and I think they will) they are going to face angry shareholders
who will want to know why production keeps declining, while
the price of gold and silver soars. If you were a major
mining executive, would you want to be facing shareholders
each year at the annual stockholder meeting and talk about
why production keeps declining? The share price of majors,
which have lagged far behind the junior mining or second
tiered producing sector, may fall further behind as investors
begin to take notice. It will become similar to what has
happened to the price of gold hedgers such as Barrick and
Placer who have seen their shares lag the markets considerably.
Their hedge book has capped gold prices and profits. What
worked during the bear market in gold doesn’t work anymore
when you are in the beginning stages of what could be the
biggest gold and silver bull market in the last 100 years.
It is all about supply and it is supply that matters. The
companies that can find and produce the gold and silver
wins in this new major bull market in metals. In the majority
of the cases these are the juniors.
Investor Influence
The problem for the majors is that they are
going to see stiff competition in the search of ounces.
Their competition this time around is not just from their
peers, it will also come from investors. Believers in this
bull market have been accumulating bullion and junior mining
shares for the last 2-3 years. When we invest in a junior,
those shares are permanently taken off the market. As an
investor and a believer in this new bull market, we don’t
trade our shares. We hold them as long-term investors. Simply
put, there is a shortage of high quality product out there.
We own only 7 juniors, but our positions are sizable in
the companies we own. When we buy, we hold. This means that
shares are taken permanently off the market. This leaves
fewer shares to buy, which can only lead to higher prices
down the road as ounces are added on the balance sheet.
The gold and silver mining market is small
by comparison to other financial markets. Just three companies,
Newmont, Barrick and AngloGold make up 35% of the market
capitalization of all listed gold and silver stocks. The
market cap of the Amex Gold Bugs Index is only $50 billion.
The market cap of the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index
is only $71 billion. The market cap of many juniors is only
$25-$50 million -- chump change in today’s global financial
markets. Quite simply, there isn’t enough gold and silver
bullion or mining shares to satisfy investment demand. The
entire gold and silver bullion market along with the capitalization
of all gold and silver mining equities is not much over
$130 billion. This market is minuscule in comparison to
the global market capitalization of stocks and bonds which
runs in tens of trillions of dollars.
For the majors it is a tough call. Do you
go out and try to find the ounces--a process that can take
5-7 years, or do you step up to the plate and pay up for
gold that has already been discovered lying dormant in the
ground in the portfolio of a junior exploration company.
My analysis tells me they embark on an acquisition spree
once they realize their precarious predicament. For many
of the majors, their mine life has been declining.
| Major
Gold Producers |
|
Notes:
|
Price
(1) |
Reserves
(2) |
Resource
(3) |
Production
(4) |
Cost/oz
(5) |
Cost/oz
(6) |
Reserve
Extracted
(7) |
Projected
Mine Life
(8) |
| AngloGold |
$325* |
72.3 |
146.4 |
5.94 |
$161 |
$203 |
6.7 |
10.7 |
| Newmont |
$300 |
84.4 |
20.6 |
7.60 |
$189 |
$229 |
10.5 |
8.0 |
| Barrick |
$300 |
86.9 |
25.4 |
5.69 |
$177 |
$268 |
7.6 |
11 |
| Gold
Fields (2001) |
$270 |
81.0 |
144 |
3.64 |
$190 |
? |
4.9 |
17 |
| Placer
Dome |
$300 |
52.9 |
74.8 |
2.82 |
$178 |
$231 |
3.2 |
16 |
| Harmony
Gold (2001) |
$262 |
32.5 |
65.2 |
2.14 |
$234 |
? |
2.3 |
14 |
| "New
Kinross" (est.) |
$300 |
12.2 |
21.3 |
1.95 |
$197 |
$278 |
2.4 |
5 |
| Ashanti
(2001) |
$300 |
21.3 |
36.6 |
1.66 |
$190 |
276 |
1.8 |
12 |
| Source: H.R. Bullis, "Gold Deposits, Exploration Realities,
and the Unsustainability of Very Large Gold Producers,"
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Petroleum,
EMG Vol. 10, No 4, March 24, 2003, p. 316.
* AngloGold uses a $400/oz gold price for Resource calculations.
(1) Gold price used to calculate proven and
Probable reserves.
(2) Proven plus Probable reserves reported at year
end 2002 (millions of ounces).
(3) Measured plus Indicated reserves reported at
year end 2002 (millions of ounces).
(4) Reported attributable ounces (millions of ounces).
(5) Production cash cost/oz.
(6) Total production cost/oz.
(7) Reserve extracted is the number of ounces removed
from Proven plus Probable reserves, i.e. ounces
produced factored for metallurgical recoveries.
(8) Reported Proven plus Probable reserves divided
by ounces removed from reserves. |
It is no longer a question of finding ounces
anymore. It has become a question of survival. According
to geologist H.R. Bullis, today’s VLGP’s are unlikely to
survive at current production rates over the next decade.
It is time to open the checkbooks and go get the ounces.
Today’s Markets
Markets were up overseas and lower here in
the U.S. on Monday. The Dow closed at its lowest price in
a month led lower by a fall in the prices of Intel, Kodak,
and GE. The NASDAQ got hammered losing almost 2% on the
session. There just aren’t a lot of catalysts right now
and share prices are steeply overvalued. The economy is
starting to soften again as it looks like the U.S. dollar
remains vulnerable. The only thing holding up the dollar
is the central banks of Japan and China. Outside these large
buyers of dollars there is nothing fundamentally holding
up the greenback but fiat air. While the share price of
almost everything was in the red today, there were a few
exceptions in silver shares and oil.
In other markets bond prices went even higher
as yields fell to 3.77% on the 10-year Treasury note. Oil
and gold prices pulled back slightly, while the price of
silver remained unchanged at near record highs. The dollar
retreated and looks vulnerable at this point.
Volume on the NYSE was only 1.2 billion shares,
while on the NASDAQ volume climbed to over 2 billion shares,
a heavy distribution day for the NASDAQ. Market breath was
negative by 18-14 on the Big Board and 21-10 on the NASDAQ.
Jim Puplava
Technical
Review
by Eric King
I have stated that
I liken the coming consolidation phase in the gold
and silver market to that of the networking sector in the
1990s and I coined the term for the future
consolidation as the "PAC-MAN" phase. Higher share
prices for major mining companies such as Newmont Mining
coupled with declining production is signaling that
the consolidation phase which I have previously written
about is at hand. As the share prices of networking companies vaulted
higher they began to use their stock as "currency" in order
to make acquisitions and offset the fact that their acquisition
targets had also gained significantly in market value.
The culmination of this paper "currency" acquisition
frenzy, or as I like to call it "PAC-MAN" phase, ended
with Cisco purchasing Cerent Corp. for 6.9 BILLION
dollars in an all stock transaction late
August of 1999. At the time, Cerent incredibly only
had $9.9 million of sales and had lost $29.3 million
in the first half of its fiscal year!!! Nortel had already
purchased Bay Networks for $9 billion and Lucent had purchased
Ascend Communications for $20 billion in all stock transactions.
The main thing to consider here is that the companies
which were making significant acquisitions during that time
period watched their share prices climb to extraordinary
levels while competitors were left in the dust. It was during
this time that the "PAC-MEN" ruled.
Cisco Daily from
1990 to 2000

Cisco, led by
John Chambers was the master of acquisitions making 12 to
18 each year at its peak and consequently their shareholders
and management made fortunes during this remarkable time
period. $1,000 invested in CSCO in 1990 was worth $1,640,000
at the top, an amazing 1,640 fold increase! As the chart
shows, acquisitions increased as the paper value of Cisco's
share price appreciated.
Cisco Weekly Chart
from 1990 - 2000

Note the MACD
on both the daily and weekly charts of CSCO as it shows
the periods of consolidation and how long-term investors
held on despite "sell" signals. Of course the "wise"
investors sold into the mania. During this "PAC-MAN"
consolidation phase companies such as Cisco were looking
to make sure the acquisitions kept them in a "strong
product cycle" which in turn kept their share
prices climbing.
Lucent Technologies
was also a large "Pac-Man" during this time eventually purchasing
Ascend Communications for 20 billion dollars in an all stock
deal using it's paper as "currency" two days after buying
Keenan for 1.5 billion dollars. During a four year
period, Lucent gobbled up 38 companies while it's share
price was on it's way into the stratosphere.
LU Daily Chart
from 1996 to 1999

Now let's take
a look at the Networking Index:
Even though companies
in the NWX (Networking Index) already had extraordinary
gains by the time the NWX was created in 1996, networking
companies which understood the "PAC-MAN" concept began to
aggressively make acquisitions using their stock as "currency."
These companies which ruled as "PAC-MEN" watched their share
prices skyrocket!!!
Networking Index
Daily Chart from 1996 to 2000

Just as the networking
executives saw the need to keep the "strong product cycles"
alive by continually purchasing junior networking companies,
the big winners in the mining sector will be those companies
whose CEO's understand the "PAC-MAN" concept and use it
to acquire high quality juniors that add significant ounces
to the balance sheet as the price of gold and silver skyrocket!
Now let's take
a look at gold during the last secular bull market and how
it ended in a mania:
GOLD Daily Chart
from 1977 to 1980

The daily chart
of gold from 1977 to 1980 shows the culmination of the last
great secular bull market in gold. You can see the
daily MACD stretching to the sky near the 100 level.
Gold Weekly Chart
from 1977 to 1980

A look at the
weekly chart from 1977 to 1980 shows the weekly MACD exploding
to the upside. We should look for the fireworks in this
secular bull market in gold to be no less exciting.
Gold Weekly Chart
from 1971 to 2004

As you can see
from the above weekly chart of gold which covers 1971 through
today, the weekly MACD went parabolic in the latter stages
of the last secular bull market. Note that the MACD today
is still hovering near the "zero" line. There is still unimaginable
room to the upside in this secular gold bull market after
gold finishes its consolidation around the $400 level
Now let's turn
to the HUI (Gold Index) and its implications in the coming
"PAC-MAN" phase:
HUI Weekly Chart
from 1996 to 2004

As you can see,
the HUI created in 1996 has moved from around the 35 level close
to 260 at the recent peak and is currently trading above
230. This process of the secular bull market pricing up
the major mining shares will allow them to use their stock
as "currency" during the coming "PAC-MAN" phase. Although
the price of junior mining shares have also appreciated,
the major mining companies which use their shares as "currency"
and "get the ounces" will position themselves for the greatest
appreciation to the upside as the price of gold and silver
soar, just as the major networkers who gobbled up junior
networkers saw the price of their stocks soar.
In this secular
bull market in gold and silver there will be major mining
companies whose share prices will leave their competitors
in the dust because they grasp the "PAC-MAN" concept first
and begin to aggressively purchase high quality juniors
adding ounces to the balance sheet in what will in all likelihood
be a very, very long secular bull market in gold and silver.
Eric King
©
2004 Jim Puplava & Eric King
March 8, 2004
|