|
|
|
| Vancouver, Iran, Russia, Europe
|
|
|
VANCOUVER GOLD SHOW
The Cambridge House Vancouver
Gold Show, put on by the intrepid team led by Joe Martin,
was a resounding success with over 7000 passing the gates.
Once again, a gorgeous setting. The high volume numbers are
a sign of the times, and indication of the heightened interest
in gold. My duties were completed, impressions were gathered,
people at key companies were engaged, some subscribers were
met, a few fellow writer analysts were joined, a superstar
CEO dined me, and one of the most exquisite Investor Relations
people on the planet displayed her considerable charms.
The biggest surprise to me was what went
unsaid, except by me. It seemed
not a single speaker, analyst, or writer cited the heightened
risk connection between the Iran nuclear confrontation and
the defense of the Petro-Dollar with the inauguration of the
Iranian Oil Exchange in March. All
three topics are integrally related. They see it only as a
geopolitical stress point and conflict which has drawn several
key world players in an energy region. Nobody sees the Iranian
sale in euros as connected to the claimed nuclear threat.
My view is that Iran has years to go before it can conduct
the necessary steps on the scientific laboratory front, regardless
of what the International Atomic Energy Commission has stated.
Recall just three years ago, certain agencies were strongarmed
into claiming Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Wake up
and smell the disinformation branded coffee!!! Huge steps
must be accomplished before peaceful nuclear fueled electric
generation can jump to the weapons grade processing for bombs.
And then there is missile delivery system. A bigger problem
for the US & West is that Iran can defend its coast with
missile batteries, unlike Iraq since its “No Fly Zone”
was imposed. Beware of closure of the Persian Gulf itself,
whose narrow passageway is the Strait of Hormuz. This is the
ultimate pressure point, the carotid artery in the neck whose
blood leads to the brain, for those who have a brain.
THE IRAN THREAT
The bigger threats in my view are two-fold.
The real nuclear threat might be from Russia in defense of
Iran, if attacked. Last summer, Russian President Putin promised
a military response to any outside aggression against Iran.
This creates a standoff with the United States, and helps
to explain why the USGovt has appealed to the for UN sanctions.
Let it be known that when it
came to Iraq, the USGovt leaders proclaimed the extreme irrelevance
and corruption of the United Nations generally.
Now the UN is critical to US interests? No way! In my view,
the US is hamstrung and frustrated to respond to Iran, which
is working with Russia on nuclear technology. Last March 2005,
Putin promised that Russian processor plants would treat all
spent nuke plant fuel, to assure that any weapons grade material
would not fall into Iranian hands. That gesture seemed to
defuse the entire Iran problem for the entire spring, summer,
and autumn. So why is Iran suddenly so important? That is
an easy question to answer, at least for those who are naturally
suspicious.
The Iranian Oil Exchange opens for
business in March, to sell oil in euro currency denomination.
That is what! Iran intends to do what Saddam did, to sell
oil for euros and to undermine the US-centric world banking
system. This is so strange. Ben Laden pronouncements identified
the financial vulnerability of the West, yet when a choke
point is threatened, nobody seems aware of it.
My contacts in Zurich inform me of recent pressure
by banks to shut down Iranian bank accounts. So a nuclear
problem in Iran has seen a bank response. Bull. The proper
viewpoint is that Iran represents an assault on the banking
system, so a bank response was the first volley. Naturally,
since the real threat is to the Petro-Dollar. By accepting
euros in transactions to sell oil, and soon natural gas and
more, once again the world banking system superstructure is
shaken. The year 2006 will go down as the one when the USDollar
lost its tight grip on the commercial transaction world.
THE DEFACTO USDOLLAR OIL STANDARD
Let’s back track a bit. In 1945,
the world embraced a USDollar Gold Standard. Not labeled as
such, the 1971 abandonment of the Bretton Woods agreement
by Richard Nixon represented a US Treasury default. Charles
DeGaulle demanded gold for the seemingly minor trade surplus
that France enjoyed bilaterally with the United States. Nixon
basically said “F.U.” to France, and told him
to go eat our USTB paper rather than to wallow in our gold.
The US then began to enjoy the extreme benefits of a world
financial system which catered to our debt production. Sadly,
the biggest exports out of the USEconomy these past few years
are jobs and debt securities. After
the Arab oil embargo in 1973, the world put in place a defacto
USDollar oil standard. That is the
important point. The USDollar has a defacto backing which
receives far too little publicity. The US-Saudi security alliance
has sealed the Petro-Dollar standard. The USDollar is not
backed by oil. Oil is backed by the USDollar via that alliance.
If anything, the USDollar is nowadays backed by a powerful
military and permission to have access to the US marketplace,
i.e. shopping malls, retail chains, and car dealer showrooms.
The Petro-Dollar meant the Persian Gulf oil
producers would recycle their oil revenues into the US financial
system, bonds and stocks, even real estate property. The Petro-Dollar
system meant the US Military would protect the Arab sheikdoms
and their royal governments. The Petro-Dollar system also
meant that global nations would accumulate US Treasurys to
pay for large oil transactions. The world banking system,
and in particular the central bank currency reserves system,
would be US$-centric.
The Iranian Oil Exchange challenges the Petro-Dollar.
This time it is different. Iran aint Iraq. Iran has two big
friends who have a good memory of recent heavy-handed dealings.
When the United States invaded Iraq, established the reconstruction,
and began to install a new government, it did so with little
resistance. In the process two big events took place, not
mentioned much by the lapdog US press & media. Russia
got screwed out of multiple billion$ in Iraqi debt. China
got screwed out of multiple billion$ in large contracts for
Iraqi oil.
MOTIVES FOR THE IRAQ WAR
The American public was once led to believe
the Iraq War was all about removing the threat of weapons
of mass destruction (WMD), and spreading democracy in the
Persian Gulf. These are lofty goals held as high ideals in
the US historically. My view was the former was pure smoke
screen intended for the uneducated (scared, patriotic) masses
to devour, and the latter was an impossibility in a Moslem
nation whose religious factions are openly hostile to each
other. Behind the scenes, six
motives for the Iraqi War can hardly be minimized or dismissed,
all of which are financial in nature. At
best, these are coincidental add-on benefits. At worst, these
are hidden motives. You be the judge. It is not for me to
say. The editorial world has an inherent responsibility to
report the news, and offer analysis of it. The US media sorely
falls short in providing balanced reporting, possibly due
to conglomerate ownership of the media networks by large corporations,
a factor which was not the case during the VietNam era, and
not during the Watergate era.
While we hear in the media like an endless drumbeat
the benefits of WMD removal and democratic reform, we hear
next to nothing about the six other major potential motives.
1) Stop the world market sale of crude oil in
euro denomination by Saddam Hussein, which benefited Iraq
as they held a rising euro currency instead of a falling USDollar
currency
2) Guarantee the United States “first in line”
position for purchasing Iraqi crude oil output, at a time
when locking in supply chains became critical to economic
health, and major oil field production was on the decline
3) Establish low-cost US Military bases in the strategically
centered Iraq, next door to Saudi Arabia, after repeated requests
that the Saudis were uncomfortable with large US presence
on their soil
4) Corner the entire oil services contracts with US corporations
for rebuilding Iraqi oil operations, securing multi-year multi-billion
dollar deals, shutting out European firms
5) Cancel and rescind all oil purchase contracts with China
extending to future years so that Iraqi oil output is sold
to westward sites
6) Put France, Germany, and Russia in secondary positions
for bargaining on Iraqi debts, which would be paid from future
Iraqi oil revenue controlled by the US
These are not small factors, yet they receive
little attention. They drive home the point that military
activity might be the ultimate fixed investment, clearing
the path for future business activity. A friend hoots about
his big Halliburton (symbol ‘HAL’) stock gains.
Each factor could fill a book with consequences to economies,
corporations, banking, business contracts, geopolitics, and
military implications. The sale of Persian Gulf crude oil
for three years has been brisk, in USDollar terms. The investment
to preserve the US Treasury Bond system has been successful.
Nevermind that half of all USTBond purchases come from overseas
by foreign hands, the embodiment of a massive transfer of
wealth. The Iranian Oil Exchange threatens the Persian Gulf
sales on the eastern flank, the flank more tied to former
Soviet republics where China has made huge inroads, the flank
where the big important new oil pipeline is located, connected
to the Central Asian republics.
Iraq, Russia and China remember well their Iraqi
debt loss. They remember well their energy contract loss.
With Iran, it is their second chance to halt any second shock
& awe thrust executed by the USA. By raising the defense,
the US must raise the stakes. We see it.
BACK TO IRAN
By enlisting Russian and Chinese assistance
militarily, Iran has won some effective defense. Clearly,
Russia is the key participant, but not without China supplying
key Silkworm missiles themselves. Recall Putin is a master
chess player. Russia recently announced the sale of world
class missile systems to Iran. Be sure that overtaking Iraq
was akin to taking the lunch pail from a 7-yr old boy sitting
for a school bus. Overtaking
Iran bears no resemblance to Iraq.
Iran has over 70 million people, as opposed to Iraq’s
23 million. Iran has no easy borders and no friendly neighbor
for the US to base an attack. The “shock & awe”
was mere target practice and an exercise of advanced weaponry
on largely undefended sites. Iran is not that 8-yr old undefended
schoolboy. The bear and the dragon walk to the boy’s
left and right, like body guards. Iraq was not the Luftewaffe,
the Panzers, or Werrmacht from the powerful Germany Military
in World War II. This Iran is much more formidable an adversary.
The failure to influence Iranian national elections has led
to a gathering storm in Iran. My view is that the storm is
to widen the crack on the Petro-Dollar, and the winds are
to shake its foundation in the banking sector.
Iran does not have a solid mandate and
consensus for a stable mullah-led Islamic government. They
have bigtime problems. My few Moslem friends laugh about how
seriously the USGovt leaders and the American public took
the calls for Iran to wipe Israel off the map. Teheran
leaders have a challenge of their own, to distract the public
from the economic troubles in their country, and to defuse
the resentment for the draconian rules imposed by mullahs
on daily life. We in the United
States mistakenly regard their election of Ahmadinejad as
a wide mandate with a majority. It is easy to win a loud majority
when the opposition is forbidden to appear on the ballot for
the election. In the US high schools, we have a lovely custom
of meeting on Friday late afternoons a little early before
the closing bell for the clear purpose of whipping up the
student body emotions. The football coach and certain important
teachers will stir up the young kids to a frenzy, as that
night a football game is to be played. The emotions are directed
toward the other team, the other school, urging the varsity
squad good guys to kick the butts from the opposition, to
run their noses into the ground. School unity is easy to achieve.
Ahmadinejad had the same purpose, to whip up the crowds in
national unity. Israel and the United States are the easy
targets, with Israel the less risky target. My Moslem friends
point to US high school pep rallies as being very similar.
Recall that so many of Iran’s population are under the
age of 30 years.
The entire nuclear story is the disinformation
about Iran. Can anyone remember
the incessant drumbeat of Weapons of Mass Destruction concerning
Iraq? Have we learned anything? It
is a sad observation for me that Americans and their leaders
do not learn from history, when it comes to bubbles, to dealing
with tyrants who opposed communism, to misunderstanding cultures
abroad. We were made fools (not
me) about WMD in Iraq. We are being made fools about nuclear
proliferation in Iran now. Few even
at the Vancouver Gold Show seemed to identify the vast disinformation
on the Iranian threat. The threat is to the Petro-Dollar superstructure
banking system.
RUSSIA WANTS A STRONGER EURO
In 2004 and 2005, it became clear that
the Saudi-led OPEC ministers were increasingly uncomfortable
with the declining USDollar as legal tender for oil sales
incoming revenues. It seemed to me that OPEC had enlisted
the only other military power with a vested interest in selling
oil in euro denomination for political alliance and help,
Russia. Behind the scenes, it
seemed to me that Russia has become the spearhead to fracture
the Petro-Dollar. Iraq was all
about defense of the Petro-Dollar.
Iran is all about the fracture of the Petro-Dollar. That fracture
will be enforced by military means, or brought about with
military support behind the levered pressure.
With over 80% of its energy product sales to
Europe, Russia has a vested interest to sell in euros. Imagine
how ridiculous it would be for the US to purchase Canadian
oil in Japanese yen transactions. Soon we might purchase Canadian
oil with Canadian Dollars! Putin might have tweaked the nose
of Europeans with a Ukrainian finger to gain the attention
of Europeans to constructively engage Iran. It is my belief
that Putin eagerly wants Europe to engage, secure, and conduct
business with Iran for the purchase of oil & natural gas
products in euro transactions, SO THAT CHINA WILL NOT LOCK
UP IRANIAN OUTPUT. Remember that Putin and the Russians have
more European blood coursing their veins that the Chinese
genetic variety. The ties from Russia to Europe might have
a long history of conflict, but that history is full of long
tentacles and deep embraces. Russia might see China as an
eventual adversary, since their eyes are open. USGovt leaders
still see China as a low-cost supplier and credit supplier.
With undue focus on Iraq to fight terrorism, the US leaders
might be outflanked by Russia and China in Iran. In no way
does a UN assault complete any Pincer maneuver.
THE WIND AT EUROPE’S BACK
Today, the German IFO business confidence
index came out, a favorable rise for the third consecutive
month. It registered the highest level in over five years.
In the US financial sphere, confidence measures are the fluffy
concepts whose statistics are closely tied to stock indexes,
probably responding to the S&P index and not leading it.
In Germany, the business confidence
index is a more important reflection of their economy, their
exports, and a leading indicator on the euro currency.
Even without help, the EU currency is pointed toward a nice
recovery in 2006. My standing Hat Trick Letter forecast is
for the euro to hit 125 by midyear, and 129 by year end. These
might be easy forecast hits, achieved in spring for the 125
level.
Notice how the euro has risen with the crude
oil price jump last week on the Iran news. The 20-week moving
average has turned upward. The 50-week MA is stopped its decline
and is flattening nicely. The 125 mark is within easy reach.
Recall how FOREX traders called for 115 as the next stop this
winter. They might have hoped to lead sheep to sell the euro
as they bought. The chart indicates “the euro is a running”
and is now in overbought territory. Recall just a month ago,
in “T/A:
Euro Bullish Divergence” a warning was given by
this pen that the euro is about to go running to the northern
plains, to graze, to feed off the bloated USDollar pastures.
The European Union has a trade surplus, a fact
lost on the US intrepid sleepy press & media. The Euro
Central Bank probably has much more gold in their vaults to
back their euro currency than the USA has in its vaults to
back the USDollar. Their EU economy limps along at 1% GDP
growth, roughly equal to any “untreated & unmassaged”
US GDP growth after distortions, exaggerations, and other
negligence are removed.
Here is a tidbit to display vividly why the
US GDP is nowhere near 4.0% growth. This past autumn, competent
economists proclaimed the twin hurricane damage would inflict
a 1.0% to 1.1% hit on the economic growth. Instead, we saw
a 0.5% upward adjustment to Q3 growth and will probably see
a similar distorted lift in reported Q4 growth. Most, if not
all, of US claimed economic growth is improperly unadjusted
price inflation, labeled as growth. The lie is at least 3%,
and likely 4% or more. Our growth is nothing but price inflation.
My point all along is that with an
absurdly under-stated Consumer Price Index, and an even lower
misrepresented Deflator series (used to remove price inflation),
the US GDP is perhaps 3% lower than reported. Yes,
the EU and USA have a similar 1% GDP economic growth rate.
They tell the truth in Europe, while the USA lies through
its teeth. In fact, we lie on all important economic statistics,
which any young teenager can discern with the tools learned
in school. We lie on GDP growth, lie on CPI inflation, lie
on unemployment rate, lie on productivity, and lie on savings.
This is a grand disappointment for me personally, to realize
my nation has such engrained institutional lying, apart from
politics. Such statements have no bearing on personal patriotism
or lack thereof. Any such accusation flies in the face of
freedom of speech, and freedom to think for that matter. Of
course, a job requirement for our politicians is to play fast
& loose with the truth and also be well connected to big
corporations.
THE 2006 YEAR AHEAD
The 2005 year saw Wall Street dead wrong
about the energy price, but for weather reasons. The
2006 year will see Wall Street dead wrong about the energy
price, but for geopolitical reasons. As
the global economy heaves from the stress of extended asset
bubbles, astronomical imbalances, and gargantuan USGovt federal
deficits, that stress will be felt increasingly on the geopolitical
stage. The continued subsidies to the USEconomy cannot continue.
The continued shun of China from the G10 Finance Minister
Meetings cannot continue. The table needs at least one more
seat.
The United Nations will soon come center
stage. China and Russian hold seats on the important Security
Council, where they can veto sanctions and other initiatives.
Iran has made two important friends. Iran holds the controlling
button on their national crude oil output, and appears willing
to use it as a weapon. They command 4.1 million oil barrels
per day in output, and export 2.5 mb/day. The crude oil price
jumped $3 last Friday when the Iranian leader threatened to
respond to UN sanctions with a 1 million barrel daily cutback.
The oil price has relaxed since. The Dow Jones Industrial
index gave up over 200 points. Volatility is back, a catch
phrase for 2006. Iran is all
about using military leverage, with nuclear overtones, to
fracture and bring an end to the Petro-Dollar. Perhaps
one should hope, in nuclear language of yesteryear, for a
new era of peaceful co-existence for both a Petro-Dollar and
Petro-Euro. Mutually assured destruction (MAD) is not a viable
option. The Western world must adapt to the arrival of the
Shanghai Coop Group, whose store front will be the Iranian
Oil Exchange. Move over, International Petroleum Exchange
(London) and New York Mercantile Exchange. An Asian kid wants
a store front, removed from Western influence, whose influence
has too much history of heavyhandedness.
Unfortunately, the USDollar world reserve system
has been wickedly used and exploited by the USGovt and US
Economy to obtain a free ride amidst what can be loosely described
as an extortion ring. See my “Petro-Dollar
& Protection Racket” from April 2005 for a wake-up
call. Three decades have wrought tremendous abuse and enormous
resentment. The US has obtained a free ride on the highway
of power and wealth. We get rich via inflation without a sweat
operating clean inflationary machinery, while Asia works in
dirty factories and spoils its environment, Europe struggles
within the confines of its own nettlesome social networks,
and the Persian Gulf & Central Asia suffers as a war zone.
The implications to gold are tremendous
and not to be minimized. If central bankers around the world,
not just in Asia and the Persian Gulf, decide to diversify
their massive foreign reserves, they will grab more gold for
their vaults. It protects them from declines even as it fortifies
their banking systems. It is
curious to me that the Petro-Dollar implications extending
from Iran to the oil market linkage to bonds and currencys
is lost on many analysts. However, the specter of central
bank diversification of US$-based reserves is fully understood
and DREADED. The concepts are extensions
of each other, lost on the financial press. Iran stands as
a direct assault on the Petro-Dollar superstructure system.
My view is that removal of the Petro-Dollar
system could mean an increase of 2% to long-term US interest
rates, a 2% increase to long-term US mortgage loan rates,
a 20% decline in the USDollar exchange rates, a 20% decline
in the S&P500 index, and a 20% decline in US housing prices.
The end, or even the sunset, of this system would mean a gigantic
lift to the gold price and crude oil price, likely to rise
by at least 50%.
Look for trade war to render most financial
market and economic forecasts wrong in 2006. Trade war is
always on my monitor. Just when one thought China might be
the key player on trade protection and sanctions and tariffs,
enter Iran with its oil card. With Iran, WE HAVE THE LOUDEST
OF TRADE WAR. Not to be outdone, China has responded to the
failed Unocal acquisition deal. When the US Congress nixed
the Unocal deal, and declared “your US$-based money
is no good,” China responded by locking down the deposits
from the entire nation of Kazakhstan, gained a foothold in
Nigeria, and fortified its Iranian contracts. The message
is clear: China will secure Central Asia and leave the United
States to struggle for what it used to obtain without a struggle.
Watch as the fringe of OPEC splinters.
These important events and concepts are examined
from an inter-market viewpoint in the monthly newsletter referenced
below. Huge opportunities exist for personal investment profit.
THE HAT
TRICK LETTER COMBINES MACRO ANALYSIS
WITH INVESTMENTS.
For specific detailed analysis of the
Gold, USDollar, Treasury bonds, and inter-market dynamics
with the US Economy and Fed monetary policy, see instructions
for subscription to my newsletter research reports, which
include stock recommendations positioned to rise in the commodity
bull market.
|