|
|
|
| It's Always Darkest Before The Dawn
|
|
|
December 15, 2005
–I for one was taken by surprise with the ease that
gold rose and roared unimpeded through the $500-$510 an ounce
level. This range should have presented extremely strong resistance.
Beyond the fact that an important round number such as $500
nearly always gives pause to any major price rise, $510 was
an earlier formidable area that repelled the eternal metal’s
advances in January, 1983, and again in December, 1987. Yet,
despite the enormous upward rush that unfolded when this major
zone was left behind, gold quickly ran into a wall of selling
and once again plunged in price.
From its Bull Market inception at $252.50 in
August, 1999, bullish investors have been forced to endure
repeated brutal or extended, deteriorating price reversals.
This has prevented all but its most ardent believers from
continually riding the gold bull. As with most major, secular
Bull Markets some of these price declines while relatively
brief, were terrifyingly steep. This was due in part to the
rapidity with which the earlier labored price rises often
gave way to seemingly waterfall price collapses.
Gold’s first major Bull Market price break
occurred after its $252.50 nadir spawned a rapid rise to the
mid-$320 range. The upward surge required barely a month to
unfold but then, just as suddenly as it appeared, the wind
was knocked from its sails. An eighteen month grinding decline
ensued before a double bottom was struck at $255, in early
2001.
During the great gold Bull Market of the1970's,
a price downturn such as we are now enduring would have been
quite nerve-wracking for me. However, today, in a way I am
fortunate. This is due to my experience which dates back to
the mid-1960's, when I first recognized gold’s eternal
importance to civilized man.
Across the following forty year period I was
a staunch observer of gold’s daily price action. I was
there when the London Gold Pool lost control of the gold price
in1968. This group consisted of the United States and seven
other major central banks. Their mandate was to maintain gold
near the $35 price on the world’s then major gold market,
the London Gold Exchange. During the time of the Gold Pool’s
existence, inflation crept higher in the economies of the
various members, while the gold price was prevented from expressing
itself.
The Pool was formed in1961. Then as now, they
were successful in suppressing the upward movement in gold
until that fortuitous day in March, 1968. I watched when the
market ultimately overwhelmed their efforts, and when investors
fell over themselves and drove gold from $35 to $44.25 in
the space of only two trading days. I was also there when
gold collapsed from $200 at the end of December, 1974, to
its final $103 low eighteen months later. It took only three
and a half years after that nadir, for gold to touch its $875
an ounce Bull Market peak.
I guess that over the years I’ve become
somewhat emotionally immune to sharp gold price reversals.
This is due to a few factors. First, I am convinced that gold
is in a secular Bull Market that is destined to eventually
leave its1980 peak of $875 far behind. This belief is reinforced
by the fashion in which our government and Fed appear hell-bent
upon preventing even a modest recession from developing. In
fact, I believe that this desire is a major reason for Dr.
Benjamin Bernanke’s rapid ascent from virtual obscurity,
to his likely seat as Federal Reserve Board Chairman. If he
performs in the fashion that he has stated, he will be responsible
for creating an even greater flood of inflationary purchasing
media, than for which even Alan Greenspan can be credited.
Despite the fact that the general public and
the majority of noted financial experts do not understand
the relationship, gold’s destiny is sealed. As an unprecedented
number of dollar credits are created to fund our unsustainable
Federal, and balance of payments and trade deficits, knowledgeable
buyers will increasingly acquire the yellow metal, and move
it higher in price. They will realize that the future loss
of the dollar’s purchasing power will affect gold as
it has throughout history. It will drive people into the metal,
as a drowning person lunges for a life raft. Those who purchase
gold will do so in their desire to maintain the purchasing
power of their wealth. The swimmer, to save his life.
Another primary reason why the current gold
price reversal has not affected me as it would have in the
past, is that it seems “like deja vu all over again”.
I’ve lived through all of the similar declines during
the gold bull of the 1970's, as well as those that occurred
during its 1985-1987, and 1993-1996 Bear Market rallies.
It may be difficult to accept but corrections
are important for the gold Bull Market! It is normal for downdrafts
during Bull Markets to be quite severe. In fact, they often
appear to be more intense than most Bear Market down-legs.
These secondary corrections act to frighten the weak holders
out of the market. In this fashion they cleanse the market.
After the tentative investors have jettisoned their positions,
the market is then prepared to resume its skyward price assault.
I began anticipating this correction when gold
ignored the resistance that should have appeared between $500
and $510 an ounce, and rocketed higher in price. Yet, I wondered
from what price level it would occur. When gold did not hesitate,
and immediately broke through the $500-$510 area, I sensed
that the buyers and trapped short-sellers had panicked. With
some trepidation, I was uncertain if this zone would be left
untested, by a downward leg, as gold extended its upward climb.
I was concerned because I felt that the upswing was too sharp
to be sustainable, and feared that the higher the yellow metal
went without a correction, the more severe would be its decline
when it arrived.
In the December
issue of Financial Insights with gold at $495.90, I wrote
regarding the $500-$510 range, “Importantly, to my mind,
any show of substantial near-term strength from this level
should be viewed as a change in the tone of the market. It
will indicate that far greater demand, if not panic, abounds
for the eternal metal”. I went on and said, “The
road ahead will similarly be fraught with periodic, sharp
price declines as gold works its way higher in price. If you
anticipate their appearance as I do, your life will be far
less stressful”. It is amazing how quickly the lust
for the precious metal was replaced by outright fear!
It is crucial for all Bull Markets to periodically decline
in price! These retracements allow the temporary excesses
that have built up to work themselves off. It can be likened
to pressure building up in a sealed pressure cooker. If the
increasing energy is not allowed to escape, the pot will ultimately
explode.
Similarly, if a market moves in a parabolic
fashion, traveling unchallenged higher in price, when investors
finally cease buying, a price collapse will ensue. To my mind
while it is terrifying, and fraught with temporary paper losses,
the current sharp decline will be remembered as nothing more
than a normal correction within gold’s multi-year Bull
Market. Further, as hard as it may
be to believe while we are in the midst of this reversal,
it is truly healthy for the market.
I believe that gold’s present plunging
price is setting the stage for a major extension of it’s
Bull Market! When it ends, and gold resumes its northward
advance, it will be reviewed as having firmly established
$500 as a major support area. This will be critical to the
market because it will change the perceptions of it’s
players. For stock investors it will make them consider revaluing
the worth of the ore reserves, and profit potential, of their
companies to that price. I am confident that it will spark
a major broad-based advance when this realization begins to
permeate the market. For gold investors it will foster greater
confidence. They will view their downside risk in a less frightening
light. As with the stocks, it will become the impetus for
a major gold advance.
It will be informative to observe the action
of the major gold stocks as viewed through the HUI or XAU
during this gold set-back. It is likely that they will bottom
before the gold price! In fact, they may actually begin an
uptrend while gold still languishes or even continues to fall.
This scenario has often transpired at major turning points
in the gold universe. If it again occurs it will confirm that
a gold bottom is in place.
In sum, I view the present gold decline as simply a frightening
episode in gold’s secular Bull Market. I believe that
the odds greatly favor gold exhausting its decline at or near
the $500 level. While it may temporarily break below that
point, it will likely be for only a brief period.
As an aside, when I was placing the finishing
touches on this piece I remembered that I had earlier used
a similar title. I published an
essay on June 17, 2005, describing my belief that the
anguish that gold stock investors had endured was about to
end. The HUI was trading at about 200 at the time. It essentially
traded sideways for the next two months before heading skyward.
I could just as well have been describing the gold market
in that missive. Gold was near the end of a decline that took
it from $456 to a low of about $413. The yellow metal moved
slightly higher. It then briefly declined to retest the $413
level but failed to penetrate it, and the rest is history.
Deja vu again!
*******
I publish Financial
Insights. It is a monthly newsletter in which I discuss gold,
the financial markets, as well as various junior resource
stocks that I believe offer great price appreciation potential.
Please visit my website www.financialinsights.org
where you will be able to view previous issues of Financial
Insights, as well as the companies that I am presently following.
You will also be able to learn about me and about a special
subscription offer.
CAVEAT
I expect to have positions
in many of the stocks that I discuss in these letters, and
I will always disclose them to you. In essence, I will be
putting my money where my mouth is! However, if this troubles
you please avoid those that I own! I will attempt wherever
possible, to offer stocks that I believe will allow my subscribers
to participate without unduly affecting the stock price. It
is my desire for my subscribers to purchase their stock as
cheaply as possible. I would also suggest to beginning purchasers
of these stocks, the following: always place limit orders
when making purchases. If you don't, you run the risk of paying
too much because you may inadvertently and unnecessarily raise
the price. It may take a little patience, but in the long
run you will save yourself a significant sum of money. In
order to have a chance for success in this market, you must
spread your risk among several companies. To that end, you
should divide your available risk money into equal increments.
These are all speculations! Never invest any money in these
stocks that you could not afford to lose all of
Please call the companies regularly.
They are controlling your investments.
FINANCIAL INSIGHTS is written and published by Dr. Richard
Appel and is made available for informational purposes only.
Dr. Appel pledges to disclose if he directly or indirectly
has a position in any of the securities mentioned. He will
make every effort to obtain information from sources believed
to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be
guaranteed. Dr. Appel encourages your letters and emails,
but cannot respond personally. Be assured that all letters
will be read and considered for response in future letters.
It is in your best interest to contact any company in which
you consider investing, regarding their financial statements
and corporate information. Further, you should thoroughly
research and consult with a professional investment advisor
before making any equity investments. Use of any information
contained herein is at the risk of the reader without responsibility
on our part. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Dr. Appel does not purport to offer personalized investment
advice and is not a registered investment advisor. The information
herein may contain forward-looking information within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance
with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the statements contained herein
that look forward in time, which include everything other
than historical information, involve risks and uncertainties
that may affect the company's actual results of operations.
© 2005 by Dr. Richard S. Appel. All rights are reserved.
Parts of the above may be reproduced in context, for inclusion
in other publications if the publisher's name and address
are also included for credit.
|