|
|
|
|
IT’S ONLY THE BEGINNING FOR URANIUM
|
|
|
A recent event motivated me to write this piece
that, if duplicated, has the potential to help launch uranium
to prices that will astound all onlookers. I first became
bullish on uranium in mid-2003. At that time it appeared obvious
that its supply versus demand equation was fated to seriously
drive higher its price. Its annual supply deficit had run
60+ million pounds for several years, oil seemed poised to
sharply rise, much of the above ground governmental and private
uranium stockpiles were already consumed, and a number of
new nuclear reactors were either under construction or were
on the drawing boards. Yet, to me, despite these increasingly
bullish factors, this new occurrence had the potential to
quickly catapult uranium’s price and stun the investing public.
A series of events have been transpiring
in the uranium industry that in and of themselves, I believe,
are destined to propel the uranium price to never before seen
levels. We have all witnessed the positive influence that
$50 + oil has had upon the price of all alternative fuels.
Similarly, we are aware of the already 30+ nuclear reactors
that are scheduled to be built in China, and the 24 that are
to be constructed in Russia by 2020. This is in addition to
the thirty + reactors that are currently under construction
worldwide, and does not include the unknown dozens that will
likely be announced as the oil price continues to ratchet
higher in price over the coming years.
An issue of great importance is
the earlier vast uranium stockpiles of the Soviet Union and
the United States. They have either already been largely consumed
or are firmly committed to long-term contracts. In the case
of the former USSR, U3O8 was salvaged from their hoard of
nuclear weapons. This was down-blended to produce nearly 400
million pounds of reactor grade material. It was reported
that nearly 175 million pounds of this commercial uranium
has already been utilized, and much of the balance is to be
delivered to three large uranium producers. Finally, recent
statements by President Bush indicate his readiness to clear
the path for a revival of nuclear reactor construction in
the United States.
America presently has about 100
active nuclear reactors. Before the accident at Three Mile
Island in the early 1980's, about 250 additional reactors
were scheduled for construction. The fear that this mishap
generated caused the cancellation of these domestic electricity
generating complexes and impeded the proliferation of nuclear
power generation world-wide.
This set-back set the stage for
what will likely become an unprecedented boom in the global
erection of nuclear reactor plants, as governments of the
world scurry to fill their power production needs. Significantly,
had nuclear power plants been allowed to expand in number
since the Three Mile Island disaster, uranium prices would
already be far higher than currently. It is my contention
that this condition is now destined to change.
Nuclear power is not only the cheapest
major form of power generation and least damages the environment,
but it is becoming one of the safest methods of producing
electrical power. Presently, most electricity is produced
by coal, oil, or natural gas fired plants. However, the cost
of these commodities has soared and, in the case of oil and
natural gas, the world will likely be forced to eventually
ration their usage. Further, oil and especially coal are long
known to be instrumental in damaging the world’s ecology due
to their various carbon and other emissions. This is not a
problem with uranium power generation. Importantly, newly
commissioned pebble bed modular nuclear reactors have essentially
overcome the potential meltdown threat that has plagued the
earlier nuclear reactor models. I believe all that is needed
is public awareness of the availability of this new technology,
and the world will open up to the desirability of nuclear
power creation.
The price of the uranium needed
to power a nuclear reactor is but a small fraction of the
cost of the electrical power that it generates. For this reason,
it matters little whether the world price for uranium is $10,
$25, $40 or even far higher. While uranium’s price inelasticity
may place the commercial uranium consumers at a slight disadvantage
it benefits those who either possess or produce U3O8.
The utilities require uranium to
continue in operation, and will pay whatever is necessary
to acquire their needed supply. Even if uranium some day spikes
to $100 a pound, the nuclear plants will have no alternative
but to purchase their uranium fuel. In this event, the cost
of the electricity delivered to the consumer will be higher.
Yet, it will likely remain competitive with that produced
by the primary alternative sources of fuel.
The event that impelled me to pen
this missive was the recent explosive rise in the spot uranium
price. In the two weeks prior to May 11, 2005, uranium rose
$5, from $24 to $29 a pound. This shocked the market! It was
primarily the result of the advent of two uranium holding
funds. Their mandates were to purchase and inventory U3O8
to the benefit of their shareholders.
Those who invest in these funds
will directly profit from any uranium price appreciation.
In December, 2004, Adit Capital Management was launched. Upon
its inception, it reportedly held about $26 million worth
of uranium. On May 11, 2005, the Uranium Participation Fund
was listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. They stated that
their initial raised capital was $90 C. million. In a listing
statement, they announced the recent $52 million purchase
of 1.85 million pounds of U3O8 at $27.87 per pound. It was
the acquisition of Uranium Participation Fund’s initial uranium
inventory, along with reported purchases by a few U.S. utilities,
that carried uranium’s price so sharply higher.
As I witnessed this enormous two
week leap in U3O8's price, it struck me that a temporary panic
had enveloped the uranium market. After pondering this event,
I realized that it took the aggressive purchase of only a
few million pounds of uranium to sharply impact its price.
To me, this highlighted the true tightness of the uranium
market, and made me contemplate what the future likely held.
The Impact That Uranium Funds
Can Have On The Market Is Enormous
The primary uranium users are electrical
power generating utilities. They have typically been in the
uranium market for a number of years and both understand the
market and can predict their uranium requirements. This places
them in a position where they can pick and choose their spots
to purchase the U3O8 that they need. Further, most utilities
sign long-term agreements with either their suppliers or the
uranium producers themselves. This normally allows them to
stagger their acquisitions so as not to roil the uranium market.
A uranium fund on the other hand
has money that it must deploy on short notice. It is likely
that some U3O8 holders held out for higher prices, knowing
that the Uranium Participation Fund was in the market for
a substantial amount of uranium, and it needed it immediately.
The fact that some utilities apparently entered the fray to
make additional purchases, also helped drive the market quickly
higher.
To my mind, this event indicates
how easy it is to spook this market! And, despite the fact
that uranium traded as low as $7 a pound only five years ago,
it makes me wonder how much pressure its usual limited short-term
availability can place upon its market if large demands arise.
The all-time high spot uranium price
was about $40 a pound. When it occurred it was rumored that
long-term contracts were struck as high as $70. Significantly,
this occurred in 1980, so these prices represent substantially
higher levels in current dollars. Of major importance, the
sharply elevated prices were still economic for the utilities
at the time.
After this peak, uranium’s price
plummeted and remained suppressed for most of the balance
of the 20th century. More than two decades of uninspired
and often sub-economic uranium prices caused world-wide production
to decline. Further, this and ore depletion forced the closure
of numerous mines. Additionally, few new mines came on stream
during the past two decades, and uranium exploration essentially
ground to a virtual halt.
Despite the fact that higher prices
have generated a renewed impetus to explore for uranium deposits,
it will likely take years before ample production occurs to
meet the increasing shortfall. Uranium deposits are similar
to diamond mines. They are typically small but are of quite
high grade. This makes them among the most difficult mineral
deposits to locate and profitably mine. Significantly, it
can take up to ten years from discovery to production, to
bring a uranium mine on line in most important U3O8 producing
nations. Permitting is a major delaying factor for various
safety and environmental reasons.
I believe that the emergence of
Adit Capital Management and the Uranium Participation Fund
are at the forefront of what will likely become a wave of
similar uranium holding companies. If I am correct, and a
number of such entities arise, their thirst for the metal
in the spot market has the potential to tip the supply versus
demand balance. If this results, it will drive the uranium
price far higher than even the other incredibly positive fundamentals
appear destined to do.
The motivating forces behind equity
managers are far different than those who direct the classical
uranium consuming companies. If a substantial amount of money
from this likely emerging sector enters either Adit Capital,
Uranium Participation, or their yet to be named progeny, an
unprecedented amount of demand will be created for uranium.
Given our recent experience, when a few million pounds of
spot market uranium demand almost overnight drove prices 20%
higher, it will be impressive to witness the outcome as future
market players become aggressive in their
uranium purchases.
Uranium’s future contract price
is currently $28 a pound. It will be important to observe
if the $29 spot price holds, to give a true indication of
its underlying strength. It would be normal to expect the
spot price to somewhat soften once the demand from the Uranium
Participation Fund is satisfied. However, to me, given the
fact that uranium’s secular Bull Market remains in its relative
infancy, I anxiously await how the myriad of bullish factors
coalesce, and propel it sharply higher in price.
The above was excerpted from
the June 2005 issue of Financial Insights ©
May 30, 2005.
I publish Financial Insights. It is a monthly
newsletter in which I discuss gold, the financial markets,
as well as various junior resource stocks that I believe offer
great price appreciation potential.
Please visit my website www.financialinsights.org
where you will be able to view previous issues of Financial
Insights, as well as the companies that I am presently following.
You will also be able to learn about me and about a special
subscription offer.
*******
CAVEAT
I expect to have positions
in many of the stocks that I discuss in these letters, and
I will always disclose them to you. In essence, I will be
putting my money where my mouth is! However, if this troubles
you please avoid those that I own! I will attempt wherever
possible, to offer stocks that I believe will allow my subscribers
to participate without unduly affecting the stock price. It
is my desire for my subscribers to purchase their stock as
cheaply as possible. I would also suggest to beginning purchasers
of these stocks, the following: always place limit orders
when making purchases. If you don't, you run the risk of paying
too much because you may inadvertently and unnecessarily raise
the price. It may take a little patience, but in the long
run you will save yourself a significant sum of money. In
order to have a chance for success in this market, you must
spread your risk among several companies. To that end, you
should divide your available risk money into equal increments.
These are all speculations! Never invest any money in these
stocks that you could not afford to lose all of.
Please call the companies
regularly. They are controlling your investments.
FINANCIAL INSIGHTS is written and published by Dr. Richard
Appel and is made available for informational purposes only.
Dr. Appel pledges to disclose if he directly or indirectly
has a position in any of the securities mentioned. He will
make every effort to obtain information from sources believed
to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be
guaranteed. Dr. Appel encourages your letters and emails,
but cannot respond personally. Be assured that all letters
will be read and considered for response in future letters.
It is in your best interest to contact any company in which
you consider investing, regarding their financial statements
and corporate information. Further, you should thoroughly
research and consult with a professional investment advisor
before making any equity investments. Use of any information
contained herein is at the risk of the reader without responsibility
on our part. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Dr. Appel does not purport to offer personalized investment
advice and is not a registered investment advisor. The information
herein may contain forward-looking information within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance
with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the statements contained herein
that look forward in time, which include everything other
than historical information, involve risks and uncertainties
that may affect the company's actual results of operations.
© 2005 by Dr. Richard S. Appel. All rights are reserved.
Parts of the above may be reproduced in context, for inclusion
in other publications if the publisher's name and address
are also included for credit.
|