|
|
|
|
THE "GLOOM AND DOOMERS" FIND
COMPANY
|
|
|
September 25, 2005 - For over four decades,
observant and open-minded individuals have become deeply concerned
about the future of our great nation. They refused to accept
the rosy official and media testimony regarding our nation's
fiscal and monetary integrity. Similarly, they did not believe
the negative rhetoric directed towards gold. Just as these
independent thinking and far-sighted people recognized that
one plus one would always equal two they also knew that no
one, nor no nation, could create something from nothing. Throughout
this period they witnessed the U.S. government and the Federal
Reserve banking system work together to create U.S. dollars
from thin air, in order to finance our growing national budget
deficits. It was not only obvious to these people that inflation
must result from our government's actions, but that numerous
economic and financial distortions would occur and likely
ultimately spawn a serious economic decline. They had learned
from history of the damage that accrued to the lives of the
common man, whenever a nation debased its currency.
Stable prices within an economy are produced when there is
a balance between the purchasing media in its financial system,
and the amount of goods and services offered on its markets.
However, when the dollar value of the available items and
services remain essentially constant, but a country's money
stock is increased, the additional monetary units will over
time act to bid up their domestic prices. This is what has
occurred in America during the past six decades, since the
U.S. left the Gold Standard. It is the underlying cause of
the loss of the dollar's purchasing power.
According to extensive research performed by the outstanding
American Institute for Economic Research (AIER, Great Barrington,
Massachusetts), "For roughly 150 years after the Mint
Act of 1792, by which Congress established and defined the
Nation's currency, the purchasing power of the dollar fluctuated
in a relatively narrow range. At the end of World War II,
the price level was close to the peaks (and the purchasing
power close to the troughs) reached after the War of 1812,
the Civil War, and World War I".
During the preponderance of this period the dollar was defined
as being worth a fixed amount of gold. Under the Gold Standard,
dollars could not be created unless there was sufficient gold
held by our government to redeem them. Further, during most
of this era gold and dollars could be readily exchanged for
one another by our government. This all changed with the signing
of the Bretton Woods Agreement in1944.
After 1944, the dollar's purchasing power began to decline.
This accelerated after President Nixon "closed the gold
window" in 1971. With the stroke of a pen he severed
the final link of the dollar to gold. Later, in the words
of the AIER, "By 2000, the dollar had lost more than
90% of its original purchasing power."
The term "doom and gloomers" was likely coined
by a member of the Establishment. It was done in an effort
to discredit those who recognized this condition as well as
their beliefs. This occurred because the "doom and gloomers"recognized
early that the excessive issuance of dollars effectively cheapened
those that already existed, and would lead to a number of
damaging results. First, it would create inflation. Next,
the higher prices and inflated money supply would excessively
stimulate the economy. These events, in turn, would foster
a number of other economic and financial distortions. Businesses
and individuals would make poor economic and financial decisions.
They would base their actions upon an economy which was artificially
stimulated by excessive monetary creation. Their judgements
and actions would be predicated upon fleeting, exceptional
business conditions that were largely created as the newly
issued dollars worked their way through the system. Businesses
would expand their workforces, factories and products. Additionally,
they and individuals would enter into far greater debt than
was truly warranted because they believed that the "good
times" would last longer than they should. The excessive
monetary creation, in turn, would ultimately destroy the dollar's
value on the world's markets, and further exacerbate the price
inflation within our borders as the cost rose of imported
goods.
Now, conditions have worsened to a far greater extent that
anyone could have dreamed possible prior to the 1990's. Each
recession since the Great Depression was met with greater
amounts of monetary and fiscal stimulus in order to extricate
the economy from any economic reversal. Whenever the economy
began to flounder, the money supply would be rapidly expanded
and interest rates would be cut by the Fed, while the government
enacted tax reductions and spending increases. Importantly,
during the past several years, the Fed appears to have become
hell-bent upon creating as many dollar credits as are necessary.
This, in order to prevent the economy from lapsing into any
sort of extended or even minor recession, for fear of it snow-balling
into something of far greater consequence.
Finally, the "doom and gloomers" are being joined
by other voices. However, now they are emanating from the
Establishment! Comments and declarations are now being espoused
by those who are not only highly respected and authoritative,
but who also hold among the most powerful positions in the
world's governing and cooperative bodies.
This morning's New York Times contained an article entitled
"I.M.F. Warns of Imbalance in World Consumption".
The piece contained quotes from a recent IMF report. It began
with "The United States is likely to experience slower
economic growth next year, and its rapidly rising foreign
debt is at the heart of dangerous global imbalances...".
The Times then continued and stated, "The fund said that
global economic growth had become too dependent on a handful
of countries, led by the United States, that consume far more
than they produce. That imbalance, it warned in its semiannual
World Economic Outlook, could lead to a wrenching correction".
For the International Monetary Fund to use phrases such as
"dangerous global imbalances" and "wrenching
correction" when referring to the possible outcome of
today's global economic and financial condition, is truly
unprecedented! They could have used far more subtle terms,
as they have in the past to get their point across, if they
did not deeply believe that the world's economy was at great
risk.
The Times article went on: "In an evident reference
to the United States, with its big budget deficits and relentless
consumer spending, the I.M.F. warned that the world's consumption
is 'fueled by increasingly unsustainable fiscal stimulus,
as well as housing prices that are ignoring the laws of gravity".
With these strong statements of concern, if not outright
fear, I believe that the IMF is sending a scathing message.
It is not only to the United States but to the rest of the
world, that the worst fears of the "doom and gloomers"
not only have validity, but that they may come to fruition
if major structural changes in the U.S. do not occur. This
stern warning was for the United States to limit its dangerous
monetary expansion, increase its taxes, and force its consumers
to reign in their wonton spending. Or, not only the U.S. but
the world would suffer the consequences.
These alarming statements by one of the world's preeminent
organizations followed a similar statement by the president
of the Federal Reserve Bank, Alan Greenspan. In a recent speech,
Mr. Greenspan discussed the historical precedent that resulted
whenever investors became overly excited about certain investments.
This occurred when buyers threw caution to the wind and ignored
the risks produced by their actions, by driving prices to
unsupportable high levels. He stated , "Thus, this vast
increase in the market value of asset claims is in part the
indirect result of investors accepting lower compensation
for risk. Such an increase in market value is too often viewed
by market participants as structural and permanent. ... But
what they perceive as newly abundant liquidity can readily
disappear. Any onset of increased investor caution elevates
risk premiums and, as a consequence, lowers asset values and
promotes the liquidation of the debt that supported higher
asset prices. This is the reason that history has not dealt
kindly with the aftermath of protracted periods of low risk
premiums."
Greenspan, with his statement, "vast increase in the
market value", is referring to the current enormous overvaluation
of the housing market and, I believe, stock prices. He appears
in total agreement with the IMF statement that, "housing
prices that are defying the laws of gravity". Do you
remember Greenspan's famous 1996, "irrational exuberance"
speech regarding the stock market? At that time, the Dow Industrials
were in the mid-6000 range. Do you believe that he views the
market as being less overvalued and less dangerous with the
Dow today in the mid 10,000's?
Greenspan's reference to "history has not dealt kindly
with the aftermath of protracted periods of low risk premiums"
is his "fed-speak", sugar-coated fashion of addressing
the likely severe and damaging economic fall-out when price
levels return to normal.
I believe that these unnerving observations by Alan Greenspan
and the IMF are likely the tip of the iceberg! As time passes,
I feel that similar statements will be espoused by more and
more conventional economists and government officials. They
will be preparing the world for a potential economic melt-down
that was created by our nation's prolonged, egregious, deficit
spending campaign, and the creation of the enormous amount
of dollar credits that they fostered.
The voices of the "doom and gloomers" will be increasingly
joined by those emanating from mainstream America. They will
be vindicated! However, just as all Americans benefited from
the higher standard of living generated by the decades-long
artificially induced boom, we may all have to suffer the consequences
when the business cycle turns down, and the contrived boom
turns to bust.
I realize that my analysis of the comments by the IMF and
Alan Greenspan are disconcerting. However, I believe that
it is better to face the reality and truth of a situation
and prepare for its consequences, than to put one's head in
the sand and ignore its reality and its potential damaging
effects. My hope is to help the reader recognize our nation's
precarious condition, and prepare for the difficult times
that lie somewhere ahead.
As the world's citizens recognize the dangerous position that
they are in, they will also understand that gold is their
lifesaver. Further, the term "doom and gloomer"
will likely cease to be heard, when people begin to realize
what has transpired, and they finally rush headlong into gold.
The above was excerpted from the October 2005 issue of Financial
Insights © September 25, 2005.
*******
I publish Financial
Insights. It is a monthly newsletter in which I discuss gold,
the financial markets, as well as various junior resource
stocks that I believe offer great price appreciation potential.
Please visit my website www.financialinsights.org
where you will be able to view previous issues of Financial
Insights, as well as the companies that I am presently following.
You will also be able to learn about me and about a special
subscription offer.
CAVEAT
I expect to have positions
in many of the stocks that I discuss in these letters, and
I will always disclose them to you. In essence, I will be
putting my money where my mouth is! However, if this troubles
you please avoid those that I own! I will attempt wherever
possible, to offer stocks that I believe will allow my subscribers
to participate without unduly affecting the stock price. It
is my desire for my subscribers to purchase their stock as
cheaply as possible. I would also suggest to beginning purchasers
of these stocks, the following: always place limit orders
when making purchases. If you don't, you run the risk of paying
too much because you may inadvertently and unnecessarily raise
the price. It may take a little patience, but in the long
run you will save yourself a significant sum of money. In
order to have a chance for success in this market, you must
spread your risk among several companies. To that end, you
should divide your available risk money into equal increments.
These are all speculations! Never invest any money in these
stocks that you could not afford to lose all of
Please call the companies regularly.
They are controlling your investments.
FINANCIAL INSIGHTS is written and published by Dr. Richard
Appel and is made available for informational purposes only.
Dr. Appel pledges to disclose if he directly or indirectly
has a position in any of the securities mentioned. He will
make every effort to obtain information from sources believed
to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be
guaranteed. Dr. Appel encourages your letters and emails,
but cannot respond personally. Be assured that all letters
will be read and considered for response in future letters.
It is in your best interest to contact any company in which
you consider investing, regarding their financial statements
and corporate information. Further, you should thoroughly
research and consult with a professional investment advisor
before making any equity investments. Use of any information
contained herein is at the risk of the reader without responsibility
on our part. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Dr. Appel does not purport to offer personalized investment
advice and is not a registered investment advisor. The information
herein may contain forward-looking information within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance
with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the statements contained herein
that look forward in time, which include everything other
than historical information, involve risks and uncertainties
that may affect the company's actual results of operations.
© 2005 by Dr. Richard S. Appel. All rights are reserved.
Parts of the above may be reproduced in context, for inclusion
in other publications if the publisher's name and address
are also included for credit.
|