The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: When you
get right down to it, every war has stemmed from a mass
of people struggling for power...and once the masses get
started, there’s no stopping them. Bill Bonner shows
us how absolute power corrupts absolutely...
STILL TRYING TO HUSTLE THE EAST
by Bill Bonner
Now it is not good for the Christian's health
to hustle the area in brown
for the Christian riles and the Aryan smiles
and it weareth the Christian down
And the end of the fight
is a tombstone white
with the name of the late deceased --
and the epitaph drear:
"A fool lies here
who tried to hustle the East!"
-Rudyard Kipling
The foreign press seems to have taken to the
U.S. grunt in Iraq as if he were John Wayne fighting the
Apache. They seem almost to admire the way GIs spit and
curse, and “kick butt.” "Our job is to
destroy things," said one budding Sherman to an English
reporter. The European can't help but be impressed; he wishes
he could destroy as much.
But the foreigners root for the Apache in
films, and for the Iraqi in real life. Who can blame them?
In a contest of David vs. Goliath, who takes Goliath's side?
That is the trouble one of the perverse curiosities of this
world: You go to all the trouble to get on top of it, only
to amuse your friends by falling off.
Iraqis are overwhelmingly outgunned. They
are up against the world's greatest military power. In comparison,
they are practically unarmed. It is amazing they fight at
all; for every one American they bring down, nearly 50 of
their own men get stretched out. Newspaper photos typically
show GIs in some compromising position. They are either
torturing prisoners, kicking dead bodies, or shooting unarmed
Arabs.
It was not the first time people tried to
do good in the Near East.
At the end of the 11th century, Europeans
decided to bring the blessings of Christian governance to
the towel heads. Nine hundred years later, Democracy was
the good that the do-gooders hoped to do.
The crusades of the 11th, 12th and 13th centuries
were doomed from the beginning. The crusaders had the will
and the weapons to kick Arab butts; what they lacked was
a reason for doing so. Christianity was already firmed rooted
in the Holy Lands...as it had been for more than 1,000 years,
even though Jerusalem had fallen to the caliph Omar Ibn
al-Khattab in February of 638. Amin Maalouf, in a delightful
little book, The Crusades from the Arab Point of View, tells
us how it happened, and shows us remarkable parallels between
now and then.
Hassan as-Sabbah was born in 1048, not far
from the present town of Teheran. Like Osama bin Laden many
years later, Hassan had an axe to grind. And like Osama,
he ground it on the wetstone provided by his Western allies.
What stuck in Hassan's craw was the remarkable
change that took place in the Arab world in the 11th century.
Chiitism had dominated the region at the time of his birth.
But the victory of the Seljuk turks pushed the Chiites to
the back of the bus. The Seljuks were Sunnites...and defenders
of Sunni orthodoxy.
Hassan fell in with Muslim fundamentalists
and was soon active in a resistance movement, centered in
Cairo. In 1090, he made a sudden assault on the “eagles
nest” fortress at Alamout, near the Caspian Sea, giving
him a base of operations -- like Osama's mountain red-outs
-- that was inaccessible and impregnable. There, he recruited
an army and trained them in terror.
The terrorists of the 11th century had no
fertilizer bombs and no commercial airplanes. All they had
was the equivalent of box cutters -- knives. Their technique
was to infiltrate an enemy's city, pretending to be merchants
or religious ascetes. Circulating around town, their aim
was get to know their target's movements, while making themselves
unremarkable. Then, they would spring on him suddenly and
stick a knife between his ribs.
So single-minded and unflappable were Hassan's
agents that witnesses thought they must be drugged. Thus,
they came to be known as the "haschaschin," which
became the word we know as “assassin.”
The crusaders saw the assassins not as a threat,
but as an opportunity. Like the Reagan administration in
the 20th century, the Franks of the 12th century, decided
to make common cause with the assassins against their common
enemy -- Seljuk Chiite Muslims.
Once a public spectacle gets underway, its
initial intentions, premises and causes are soon lost. Events
take on their own logic and run to the end. There is no
stopping them, no arguing with them, no trying to make sense
out of it, or trying to salvage a purpose to justify the
expense. Quo fata ferunt. Public spectacles of the financial
and political sort begin in comedy and end in farce. Those
that involve armies and war typically begin as farce and
end in tragedy. Nothing can be done to change the course
of history; all the individual can do is to try to recognize
when the spectacle nears its end...and slip out the exit
while it is still open.
When the crusaders arrived in the Holy Land,
they found a place of general religious tolerance -- there
were churches next to synagogues down the street from mosques.
The also found a region that was divided into hundreds of
political units where loyalties and alliances shifted as
fast as the desert sands. The Muslim world posed no threat
to the Christian West, it was too disorganized, unable to
protect itself, and incapable of projecting much in the
way of military power.
But the crusaders changed that. Gradually,
under Noureddin and then Saladin, the Islamic world came
together to drive out the Franks. At the decisive battle
of Hittin, Saladin brought together troops from all over
the near east and faced, none other than Renaud de Chatillon.
Al-Malik al-Afdal, Saladin's son, then just
17 years old, described the battle:
"I was beside my father at the battle
of Hittin, the first battle I had been in. When the king
of the Franks found himself on the hill, he launched a ferocious
attack that made our own troops drop back to where my father
and his horse were standing. I looked at him. He was sad.
Nervous. He pulled at his beard and stepped forward, yelling,
‘Satan must not win!’ The Muslims left once
again to assault the hill. When I saw the Franks fall back
under the pressure of our troops, I cried with joy, ‘We
have beat them!’ But the Franks counter attacked even
more strongly and our forces were once again near my father.
He pushed them this time once again to the attack and he
forced the enemy to retire towards the hill. I cried again,
‘We have them beat.’ But my father turned towards
me and told me, ‘Be quiet. We won't have beaten them
until that tent up there falls down.’ Before he was
able to finish his sentence, the tent collapsed. The sultan
[Saladin] got down off his horse and kneeled and thanked
God, crying for joy."
Saladin had a reputation for mercy and even-handedness.
But it was a rough place and a rough time. The Franks, especially,
had a reputation for butchery. Later, when Richard the Lionheart
took the city of Acre, for example, he massacred 2700 soldiers
he had taken prisoner, plus an additional 300 women and
children found in the city. Under similar conditions, Saladin
typically let his captives go free. But so great was his
disgust with Renaud that he had vowed to kill him with his
own hands. When the prisoner was brought before him, he
made good his promise.
Back in the Homeland, 2004, most Americans
have persuaded themselves that their troops are doing God's
work in the land of the ancient Mesopotamians. God means
for the Iraqis to be free and democratic, they believe.
Thus has the whole nation become a giant OJ
Simpson jury...unable to imagine that their homeland boys
could be doing anything but good. Pictures were exhibited
on national television, clearly showing a U.S. marine gunning
down a wounded prisoner. "This one's faking he's dead,"
said the soldier. Then, after a clatter of gunfire, "He's
dead now," says the marine.
A poll, that circulated on the Internet the
next day, revealed that crowd back home was fully behind
its troops -- three out of four people thought the Iraqi
had it coming.
But this is a Public Spectacle. There is no
place for ambiguity, subtlety or irony. The mass of Americans
has lined up in favor of the war against Iraq as if it were
the Superbowl, and they were backing the home team; it asks
no questions, and feels neither guilt nor shame. It sees
no need to apologize and fears no danger of retribution,
neither from man or God himself.
Regards,
Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning
P.S. For more information on the Crusades
from an Arab point of view, see the rest of this article:
Powerful Persuasion
http://dailyreckoning.com/body_headline.cfm?id=4280&tp=a
Editor’s Note: Bill Bonner is the founder
and editor of The Daily Reckoning. He is also the author,
with Addison Wiggin, of The Wall Street Journal best seller
Financial Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of
the 21st Century (John Wiley & Sons).
The Best Investment Book I’ve
Ever Read!
http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/RCKN/FDR
|
