Gold and gold stocks
December 12, 2003
Last week I commented that even though I am confident
gold will exceed $1,000 an ounce in the not-too-distant future,
I also think many investors are going to be disappointed with the
performance of their gold stock portfolios. Not surprisingly, I
got several emails asking for a clarification of that statement,
which is what this week's column is about.
Just so that we can start on the same page, the gold
price, in my opinion, is going to increase in US dollars because
the dollar will continue to decline. As the dollar gets weaker on
foreign exchange markets it loses buying power relative to other
currencies. A loss of relative buying power makes everything that
we buy on global markets more expensive in dollars relative to other
currencies.
Although gold is quoted in US dollars, it is not unique
to the United States. In fact, most gold is mined and owned outside
the United States. The US may well have the largest market for gold
derivatives but most physical gold is traded outside the US.
While the gold price is increasing in US dollars,
it may not necessarily be increasing in other currencies. Take a
look at the following chart that shows the gold price in US dollars,
South African rands and Australian dollars. South Africa, the United
States and Australia are the three largest gold producing countries
in the world. As you can see the gold price in these currencies
has acted quite differently over the past two years. It has been
flat in Australian dollars, down twenty-two percent in South African
rands and up forty-five percent in US dollars.

Gold stocks give investors leverage to the gold price
because there is a cost associated with producing gold. As an example,
if a gold mining company has a twenty percent cash operating margin
and the gold price increases by twenty percent, then the operating
cash flow of the company doubles.
Because mining is a depleting business, mining companies
should not be valued on a price to earnings basis. The value of
a mining company depends on the net asset value of the future cash
flow of its operations. If we go back to our example, and assume
that a twenty percent increase in the gold price lead to a hundred
percent increase in the cash flow of a mining company, then that
mining company's net asset value would also have doubled and the
company would be fundamentally worth twice as much. That's the benefit
of owning gold mining companies when the gold price increases.
There are other forms of leverage that also come into
play. A company's mineral resources may be uneconomical at low gold
prices but as the gold price increases some of the resources could
be reclassified to the reserve category since it becomes economically
viable to mine them. This is particularly true of some South African
mining companies that, in addition to having low operating margins
(high leverage), typically have large gold resources that become
more economical at higher gold prices.
Gold mining shares also have an "option"
value due to the leverage they have on the gold price. This option
value is very volatile but can successfully be quantified using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Gold share prices are generally
quite accurately priced based on the net asset value of the operations
plus the option value on gold that the shares represent.
Even though most investors never pay much attention
to mundane things like operating margins, net asset values, and
option values, these are ultimately what determine share prices
over the long term.
Although gold stocks have been rising in tandem with
the US dollar gold price, the fact that the gold price in other
gold producing countries has not kept pace implies that non-US operations
will not necessarily see increases in operating cash flows and earnings.
While this may not strike some investors as important, it is. It
is the reason why gold shares are likely to disappoint investors
those who disregard fundamental value.
Realize that non-US based gold operations will not
benefit from the increase in the US dollar gold price and that this,
in turn, will lead to selling that will cap the increase in gold
mining company shares, even if the majority of investors are buying
out of emotion, ignorance and greed. Ultimately if the discrepancy
between value and price of gold mining shares increases sufficiently,
it will set up an arbitrage whereby one could short the stocks and
go long physical gold. I can see that happening as the gold price
in US dollars continues to increase without a concomitant increase
in the gold price in other producing countries.
Because the gold price is increasing predominantly
due to a decline in the US dollar, it implies that only gold mining
operations located in the United States will reap the full benefit
of the increase in the gold price. Most mining companies, however,
have diversified geographically and among the major gold producers
there aren't any that have predominantly US based production. Even
companies like Barrick and Newmont, that were built on Nevada production,
now produce a significant amount of their gold elsewhere. It's almost
impossible to find good, solid companies with predominantly US based
gold production.
The perceived bull market in gold, which in
reality is only a bear market in the dollar, is drawing a lot of
capital into the sector. As time goes on this capital will seek
more and more exposure to US based gold assets. Unlike producing
gold mining companies that may ultimately not receive the benefit
of a declining dollar, exploration companies in Nevada and Alaska
will benefit from an increase in the demand for projects in those
two regions and, if they happen to find an economic deposit, benefit
from the full impact of the declining dollar. Thus, investing in
exploration companies with significant exposure to Nevada and Alaska
is, in my opinion, the best way to gain the most leverage from the
current increase in the US dollar gold price.
Paul van Eeden
Paul van Eeden works primarily to find investments for his
own portfolio and shares his investment ideas with subscribers to his weekly
investment publication. For more information please visit his website (www.paulvaneeden.com)
or contact his publisher at (800) 528-0559 or (602) 252-4477.
Disclaimer
This letter/article is not intended to meet your specific individual investment
needs and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. Nothing contained
herein constitutes, is intended, or deemed to be -- either implied or otherwise
-- investment advice. This letter/article reflects the personal views and opinions
of Paul van Eeden and that is all it purports to be. While the information herein
is believed to be accurate and reliable it is not guaranteed or implied to be
so. The information herein may not be complete or correct; it is provided in
good faith but without any legal responsibility or obligation to provide future
updates. Neither Paul van Eeden, nor anyone else, accepts any responsibility,
or assumes any liability, whatsoever, for any direct, indirect or consequential
loss arising from the use of the information in this letter/article. The information
contained herein is subject to change without notice, may become outdated and
will not be updated. Paul van Eeden, entities that he controls, family, friends,
employees, associates, and others may have positions in securities mentioned,
or discussed, in this letter/article. While every attempt is made to avoid conflicts
of interest, such conflicts do arise from time to time. Whenever a conflict
of interest arises, every attempt is made to resolve such conflict in the best
possible interest of all parties, but you should not assume that your interest
would be placed ahead of anyone else’s interest in the event of a conflict
of interest. No part of this letter/article may be reproduced, copied, emailed,
faxed, or distributed (in any form) without the express written permission of
Paul van Eeden. Everything contained herein is subject to international copyright
protection.
|