Finally!
November 05, 2004
Now that the US election is over, the market can get on
with business as usual, and that means it will shift its focus back to
the economy.
During an election year the incumbent administration presents
the economy in its best possible light, to show how beneficial its policies
have been to the economy and the country as a whole. This election year,
the administration was unable to portray the US economy as healthy.
Weakness in the economy weighed down the stock market and
could have cost George W. Bush the election, since the incumbent president
rarely gets re-elected if the stock market declines during an election
year. But then, the incumbent is also rarely defeated if the country is
at war. This year the latter outweighed the former.
President Bush has a problem: the War on Terrorism is draining
an already weak economy. On Wednesday both General Motors and Ford announce
declines in their October sales; 4.7% and 5% respectively. Regardless
of the cost, President Bush is unlikely to end the war anytime soon. At
least the Defense sector has reason for joy.
Defense stocks rallied the day after the election: Northrop
Grumman shares rose 4.1%, General Dynamics increased by 4.3% and Lockheed
Martin registered a 3.2% gain. It seems a sure-bet that President Bush
will increase defense spending, and that means the Federal budget deficit
is going to grow.
In the budget year that ended September 30, 2004, the budget
deficit came in at $413 billion. Next year’s budget deficit is projected
to approach $600 billion and has to be financed by issuing new Treasury
bonds. This added supply of bonds is sure to put downward pressure on
bond prices, which means that medium to long-term interest rates are going
to rise. To quote the Wall Street Journal, on the day after the election
“Bonds were thumped” and the thumping continued into Thursday.
According the Wall Street Journal “ Bond investors worry that government
spending will remain high. That, analysts said, raises the specter that
at some point holders of Treasuries might -- as they did in the early
1990s -- convey displeasure by pushing up yields.”
None of this is unexpected; it’s what I’ve been
writing about for almost a year now. The reason I’m still writing
the same story is because, for gold investors, this is the story. The
price of gold (in US dollars) depends on the dollar exchange rate.
Dollar volatility this week caused gold price volatility
with the dollar first declining as speculators went short and then rising
as some of those short positions were covered on Tuesday. In response,
the gold price, which has been rising since mid-October, fell on Tuesday
when the dollar rallied in response to short-covering. The dollar caught
many market players off-guard on Wednesday, the day after the election,
when it declined instead of rallying, and after Senator John Kerry delivered
his concession speech the currency’s decline accelerated. The decline
continued on Thursday as, to quote the Wall Street Journal again, “…the
currency market turned its attention back to the longer-term pressure
that the large U.S. current-account deficit (trade deficit) is placing
on the dollar. Additional pressure is coming from uncertainty about the
sustainability of the economic recovery and the sense that there are few
real dollar defenders among the ranks of U.S. and foreign monetary officials
these days.”
I know this is only two days’ trading, but this is
what I have been waiting for, and saying will happen: The dollar declined
because the currency market is now starting to focus on fundamental issues
affecting the greenback, and the greenback’s prospects are bleak.
At the same time, bond prices are falling (i.e. interest rates are rising)
because the bond market is now also looking at fundamentals, and it doesn’t
like the prospects for US bonds either. So here we have the dollar falling
at the same time as interest rates are rising.
Again, I know it’s only been a couple of days so far,
and so I absolutely would not call it a trend, but if the dollar keeps
falling while interest rates rise, the next major advance in the gold
price has begun. At least that’s my story and I’m sticking
with it.
On the lighter side, thanks to one of my readers,
I finally understand the story of the Wizard of Oz. The McKinley-Bryan
election of 1896 that I wrote about last week was also the inspiration
for Lyman Frank Baum's tale, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Here’s
the link to the website I was referred to: www.wccusd.k12.ca.us/elcerrito/history/oz.htm.
Thanks Mark.
Paul van Eeden
Paul van Eeden works primarily to find investments for his
own portfolio and shares his investment ideas with subscribers to his weekly
investment publication. For more information please visit his website (www.paulvaneeden.com)
or contact his publisher at (800) 528-0559 or (602) 252-4477.
Disclaimer
This letter/article is not intended to meet your specific individual investment
needs and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. Nothing contained
herein constitutes, is intended, or deemed to be -- either implied or otherwise
-- investment advice. This letter/article reflects the personal views and opinions
of Paul van Eeden and that is all it purports to be. While the information herein
is believed to be accurate and reliable it is not guaranteed or implied to be
so. The information herein may not be complete or correct; it is provided in
good faith but without any legal responsibility or obligation to provide future
updates. Neither Paul van Eeden, nor anyone else, accepts any responsibility,
or assumes any liability, whatsoever, for any direct, indirect or consequential
loss arising from the use of the information in this letter/article. The information
contained herein is subject to change without notice, may become outdated and
will not be updated. Paul van Eeden, entities that he controls, family, friends,
employees, associates, and others may have positions in securities mentioned,
or discussed, in this letter/article. While every attempt is made to avoid conflicts
of interest, such conflicts do arise from time to time. Whenever a conflict
of interest arises, every attempt is made to resolve such conflict in the best
possible interest of all parties, but you should not assume that your interest
would be placed ahead of anyone else’s interest in the event of a conflict
of interest. No part of this letter/article may be reproduced, copied, emailed,
faxed, or distributed (in any form) without the express written permission of
Paul van Eeden. Everything contained herein is subject to international copyright
protection.
|