Part II: Deflation or Inflation? Here is the Answer...
Picking up from Part I of this â€śtwo part mini-seriesâ€?, we are covering the inflation/deflation debate. There are tons of top-notch economic commentators on both side of the debate. As we mentioned, the debate centers on the visible sign of deflation vs. inflationâ€¦â€?pricesâ€?.
Â In part one, we highlighted what I think is an important summary of what affects â€śpricesâ€?:
THE PRICES OF GOODS, SERVICES AND ASSETS ARE MOST AFFECTED BY TWO FUNDAMENTAL FACTORS:
- THE MONEY SUPPLY (primarily enacted by government)
- DEMAND AND SUPPLY (primarily enacted by the marketplace)
Demand and supply are an important factor in this debate and I believe that this becomes a source of misunderstanding. Inflationists talk about the money supply exploding and that this massive increase will (sooner or later) mean higher prices and even to the point of hyperinflation. The deflationists tell us that we are (and will continue to be) in a powerful deflationary environment. What gives?
Demand and supply complete the observation. Lookâ€¦if a trillion dollars is printed right now but this money is not flowing toward anything (â€śdemandâ€?) then you probably wonâ€™t see a price increase. Demand has decreased for some goods, some services and some assets in recent years. However, demand has increased (or has had continued strength) in other goods, services and assets. In other words, BOTH of the inflationists and deflationists can be correct if you break down the picture. You can have inflation in one part of the economic picture but not another. You can have demand and supply bring prices down in one part of the economy and not another.
Demand, for example, has been dropping like a rock in real estate. The real estate bubble of 2000-2006 artificially stimulated supply which increased the national inventory of available property (both residential and commercial) to the highest level in history. Too much supply with falling demand obviously means falling real estate prices. No amount of created money supply was able to overcome this.
The same is true for the labor markets. Labor is priced higher than the market could realistically pay for. We forget that the price of labor is more than just â€śthe gross payâ€?; it also includes many other costs such as payroll taxes, workmenâ€™s comp, etc. The high cost of labor dampened the demand for labor; especially when demand for products and services fell. Right now, the supply of labor is much higher relative to the demand for labor.
In turn, as there are more and more unemployed, that means that less money is then available for discretionary purposes such as vacations and new cars. You get the picture.
Keep in mind that there is a big difference between â€śdeflationaryâ€? and â€śdeflationâ€?. It is much like the difference between â€śfaintingâ€? and â€śdropping deadâ€?. Lower demand does have a â€śdeflationaryâ€? effect. If less people want something then of course the price will likely drop and this can happen even if the governmentâ€™s central bank keeps expanding the money supply. What does all of this then mean for us as investors and traders?
It is actually simple to figure out what to do with your money given this historic debate:
CONSIDER PUTTING YOUR MONEY IN THOSE THINGS THAT WILL BENEFIT FROM THE MONETARY SITUATION AND FROM THE DEMAND AND SUPPLY EQUATION.
I tell my readers and students to consider putting their money (retirement or otherwise) into those things tied to â€śHUMAN NEEDâ€?. If you have your money in those things that will benefit from BOTH inflation AND where demand and supply are strong, then this merits your attention.
Stay away from where there is a deflationary impact (such as real estateâ€¦unless you really need to buy a home). Go where the money is migrating. Given this, I like gold, silver, grains, energy and other commodities. Investors and traders should consider â€śhuman needâ€? and view it as a mega-trend during the coming months and years. I believe that a commodities super-boom is a likely event (and is already unfolding).
I am on record as predicting an â€śinflationary depressionâ€? but to be more precise, we will see inflation in those things tied to â€śhuman needâ€?. No matter how good or bad the economy will be, people will still need to eat, drink, heat their homes, etc. For these reasons (and other ones), I like commodities for the long haul.
For those deflationists that believe inflation is not possible when there are bad economic conditions, I say think again. Most hyperinflations in history happened during bad economic times. Germany (1920s), Yugoslavia (1989-1994) and Zimbabwe (2007-present) are good examples. Yesâ€¦inflation and a depression can happen simultaneously. Plan accordinglyâ€¦
October 12, 2009
Paul Mladjenovic, CFP is the author of Stock Investing for Dummies and Precious Metals Investing for Dummies. Paulâ€™s latest educational program is How to Cash in on the Commodities Super Boom Seminar. His national financial seminars are at www.ProsperityNetwork.net and his blog is www.Mladjenovic.blogspot.com.