VANCOUVER GOLD SHOW
The Cambridge House Vancouver
Gold Show, put on by the intrepid team led by Joe Martin,
was a resounding success with over 7000 passing the gates.
Once again, a gorgeous setting. The high volume numbers
are a sign of the times, and indication of the heightened
interest in gold. My duties were completed, impressions
were gathered, people at key companies were engaged, some
subscribers were met, a few fellow writer analysts were
joined, a superstar CEO dined me, and one of the most exquisite
Investor Relations people on the planet displayed her considerable
charms.
The biggest surprise to me was what
went unsaid, except by me. It
seemed not a single speaker, analyst, or writer cited the
heightened risk connection between the Iran nuclear confrontation
and the defense of the Petro-Dollar with the inauguration
of the Iranian Oil Exchange in March.
All three topics are integrally related. They see it only
as a geopolitical stress point and conflict which has drawn
several key world players in an energy region. Nobody sees
the Iranian sale in euros as connected to the claimed nuclear
threat. My view is that Iran has years to go before it can
conduct the necessary steps on the scientific laboratory
front, regardless of what the International Atomic Energy
Commission has stated. Recall just three years ago, certain
agencies were strongarmed into claiming Iraq had weapons
of mass destruction. Wake up and smell the disinformation
branded coffee!!! Huge steps must be accomplished before
peaceful nuclear fueled electric generation can jump to
the weapons grade processing for bombs. And then there is
missile delivery system. A bigger problem for the US &
West is that Iran can defend its coast with missile batteries,
unlike Iraq since its “No Fly Zone” was imposed.
Beware of closure of the Persian Gulf itself, whose narrow
passageway is the Strait of Hormuz. This is the ultimate
pressure point, the carotid artery in the neck whose blood
leads to the brain, for those who have a brain.
THE IRAN THREAT
The bigger threats in my view are two-fold.
The real nuclear threat might be from Russia in defense
of Iran, if attacked. Last summer, Russian President Putin
promised a military response to any outside aggression against
Iran. This creates a standoff with the United States, and
helps to explain why the USGovt has appealed to the for
UN sanctions. Let it be known
that when it came to Iraq, the USGovt leaders proclaimed
the extreme irrelevance and corruption of the United Nations
generally. Now the UN is critical
to US interests? No way! In my view, the US is hamstrung
and frustrated to respond to Iran, which is working with
Russia on nuclear technology. Last March 2005, Putin promised
that Russian processor plants would treat all spent nuke
plant fuel, to assure that any weapons grade material would
not fall into Iranian hands. That gesture seemed to defuse
the entire Iran problem for the entire spring, summer, and
autumn. So why is Iran suddenly so important? That is an
easy question to answer, at least for those who are naturally
suspicious.
The Iranian Oil Exchange opens for
business in March, to sell oil in euro currency denomination.
That is what! Iran intends to do what Saddam did, to sell
oil for euros and to undermine the US-centric world banking
system. This is so strange. Ben Laden pronouncements identified
the financial vulnerability of the West, yet when a choke
point is threatened, nobody seems aware of it.
My contacts in Zurich inform me of recent
pressure by banks to shut down Iranian bank accounts. So
a nuclear problem in Iran has seen a bank response. Bull.
The proper viewpoint is that Iran represents an assault
on the banking system, so a bank response was the first
volley. Naturally, since the real threat is to the Petro-Dollar.
By accepting euros in transactions to sell oil, and soon
natural gas and more, once again the world banking system
superstructure is shaken. The year 2006 will go down as
the one when the USDollar lost its tight grip on the commercial
transaction world.
THE DEFACTO USDOLLAR OIL STANDARD
Let’s back track a bit. In 1945,
the world embraced a USDollar Gold Standard. Not labeled
as such, the 1971 abandonment of the Bretton Woods agreement
by Richard Nixon represented a US Treasury default. Charles
DeGaulle demanded gold for the seemingly minor trade surplus
that France enjoyed bilaterally with the United States.
Nixon basically said “F.U.” to France, and told
him to go eat our USTB paper rather than to wallow in our
gold. The US then began to enjoy the extreme benefits of
a world financial system which catered to our debt production.
Sadly, the biggest exports out of the USEconomy these past
few years are jobs and debt securities. After
the Arab oil embargo in 1973, the world put in place a defacto
USDollar oil standard. That is
the important point. The USDollar has a defacto backing
which receives far too little publicity. The US-Saudi security
alliance has sealed the Petro-Dollar standard. The USDollar
is not backed by oil. Oil is backed by the USDollar via
that alliance. If anything, the USDollar is nowadays backed
by a powerful military and permission to have access to
the US marketplace, i.e. shopping malls, retail chains,
and car dealer showrooms.
The Petro-Dollar meant the Persian Gulf oil
producers would recycle their oil revenues into the US financial
system, bonds and stocks, even real estate property. The
Petro-Dollar system meant the US Military would protect
the Arab sheikdoms and their royal governments. The Petro-Dollar
system also meant that global nations would accumulate US
Treasurys to pay for large oil transactions. The world banking
system, and in particular the central bank currency reserves
system, would be US$-centric.
The Iranian Oil Exchange challenges the Petro-Dollar.
This time it is different. Iran aint Iraq. Iran has two
big friends who have a good memory of recent heavy-handed
dealings. When the United States invaded Iraq, established
the reconstruction, and began to install a new government,
it did so with little resistance. In the process two big
events took place, not mentioned much by the lapdog US press
& media. Russia got screwed out of multiple billion$
in Iraqi debt. China got screwed out of multiple billion$
in large contracts for Iraqi oil.
MOTIVES FOR THE IRAQ WAR
The American public was once led to
believe the Iraq War was all about removing the threat of
weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and spreading democracy
in the Persian Gulf. These are lofty goals held as high
ideals in the US historically. My view was the former was
pure smoke screen intended for the uneducated (scared, patriotic)
masses to devour, and the latter was an impossibility in
a Moslem nation whose religious factions are openly hostile
to each other. Behind the
scenes, six motives for the Iraqi War can hardly be minimized
or dismissed, all of which are financial in nature.
At best, these are coincidental add-on
benefits. At worst, these are hidden motives. You be the
judge. It is not for me to say. The editorial world has
an inherent responsibility to report the news, and offer
analysis of it. The US media sorely falls short in providing
balanced reporting, possibly due to conglomerate ownership
of the media networks by large corporations, a factor which
was not the case during the VietNam era, and not during
the Watergate era.
While we hear in the media like an endless
drumbeat the benefits of WMD removal and democratic reform,
we hear next to nothing about the six other major potential
motives.
1) Stop the world market sale of crude oil
in euro denomination by Saddam Hussein, which benefited
Iraq as they held a rising euro currency instead of a falling
USDollar currency
2) Guarantee the United States “first in line”
position for purchasing Iraqi crude oil output, at a time
when locking in supply chains became critical to economic
health, and major oil field production was on the decline
3) Establish low-cost US Military bases in the strategically
centered Iraq, next door to Saudi Arabia, after repeated
requests that the Saudis were uncomfortable with large US
presence on their soil
4) Corner the entire oil services contracts with US corporations
for rebuilding Iraqi oil operations, securing multi-year
multi-billion dollar deals, shutting out European firms
5) Cancel and rescind all oil purchase contracts with China
extending to future years so that Iraqi oil output is sold
to westward sites
6) Put France, Germany, and Russia in secondary positions
for bargaining on Iraqi debts, which would be paid from
future Iraqi oil revenue controlled by the US
These are not small factors, yet they receive
little attention. They drive home the point that military
activity might be the ultimate fixed investment, clearing
the path for future business activity. A friend hoots about
his big Halliburton (symbol ‘HAL’) stock gains.
Each factor could fill a book with consequences to economies,
corporations, banking, business contracts, geopolitics,
and military implications. The sale of Persian Gulf crude
oil for three years has been brisk, in USDollar terms. The
investment to preserve the US Treasury Bond system has been
successful. Nevermind that half of all USTBond purchases
come from overseas by foreign hands, the embodiment of a
massive transfer of wealth. The Iranian Oil Exchange threatens
the Persian Gulf sales on the eastern flank, the flank more
tied to former Soviet republics where China has made huge
inroads, the flank where the big important new oil pipeline
is located, connected to the Central Asian republics.
Iraq, Russia and China remember well their
Iraqi debt loss. They remember well their energy contract
loss. With Iran, it is their second chance to halt any second
shock & awe thrust executed by the USA. By raising the
defense, the US must raise the stakes. We see it.
BACK TO IRAN
By enlisting Russian and Chinese assistance
militarily, Iran has won some effective defense. Clearly,
Russia is the key participant, but not without China supplying
key Silkworm missiles themselves. Recall Putin is a master
chess player. Russia recently announced the sale of world
class missile systems to Iran. Be sure that overtaking Iraq
was akin to taking the lunch pail from a 7-yr old boy sitting
for a school bus. Overtaking
Iran bears no resemblance to Iraq.
Iran has over 70 million people, as opposed to Iraq’s
23 million. Iran has no easy borders and no friendly neighbor
for the US to base an attack. The “shock & awe”
was mere target practice and an exercise of advanced weaponry
on largely undefended sites. Iran is not that 8-yr old undefended
schoolboy. The bear and the dragon walk to the boy’s
left and right, like body guards. Iraq was not the Luftewaffe,
the Panzers, or Werrmacht from the powerful Germany Military
in World War II. This Iran is much more formidable an adversary.
The failure to influence Iranian national elections has
led to a gathering storm in Iran. My view is that the storm
is to widen the crack on the Petro-Dollar, and the winds
are to shake its foundation in the banking sector.
Iran does not have a solid mandate and
consensus for a stable mullah-led Islamic government. They
have bigtime problems. My few Moslem friends laugh about
how seriously the USGovt leaders and the American public
took the calls for Iran to wipe Israel off the map. Teheran
leaders have a challenge of their own, to distract the public
from the economic troubles in their country, and to defuse
the resentment for the draconian rules imposed by mullahs
on daily life. We in the United
States mistakenly regard their election of Ahmadinejad as
a wide mandate with a majority. It is easy to win a loud
majority when the opposition is forbidden to appear on the
ballot for the election. In the US high schools, we have
a lovely custom of meeting on Friday late afternoons a little
early before the closing bell for the clear purpose of whipping
up the student body emotions. The football coach and certain
important teachers will stir up the young kids to a frenzy,
as that night a football game is to be played. The emotions
are directed toward the other team, the other school, urging
the varsity squad good guys to kick the butts from the opposition,
to run their noses into the ground. School unity is easy
to achieve. Ahmadinejad had the same purpose, to whip up
the crowds in national unity. Israel and the United States
are the easy targets, with Israel the less risky target.
My Moslem friends point to US high school pep rallies as
being very similar. Recall that so many of Iran’s
population are under the age of 30 years.
The entire nuclear story is the
disinformation about Iran. Can
anyone remember the incessant drumbeat of Weapons of Mass
Destruction concerning Iraq? Have we learned anything?
It is a sad observation for me that Americans
and their leaders do not learn from history, when it comes
to bubbles, to dealing with tyrants who opposed communism,
to misunderstanding cultures abroad. We
were made fools (not me) about WMD in Iraq. We are being
made fools about nuclear proliferation in Iran now.
Few even at the Vancouver Gold Show seemed
to identify the vast disinformation on the Iranian threat.
The threat is to the Petro-Dollar superstructure banking
system.
RUSSIA WANTS A STRONGER EURO
In 2004 and 2005, it became clear that
the Saudi-led OPEC ministers were increasingly uncomfortable
with the declining USDollar as legal tender for oil sales
incoming revenues. It seemed to me that OPEC had enlisted
the only other military power with a vested interest in
selling oil in euro denomination for political alliance
and help, Russia. Behind the
scenes, it seemed to me that Russia has become the spearhead
to fracture the Petro-Dollar. Iraq
was all about defense of the Petro-Dollar.
Iran is all about the fracture of the Petro-Dollar. That
fracture will be enforced by military means, or brought
about with military support behind the levered pressure.
With over 80% of its energy product sales
to Europe, Russia has a vested interest to sell in euros.
Imagine how ridiculous it would be for the US to purchase
Canadian oil in Japanese yen transactions. Soon we might
purchase Canadian oil with Canadian Dollars! Putin might
have tweaked the nose of Europeans with a Ukrainian finger
to gain the attention of Europeans to constructively engage
Iran. It is my belief that Putin eagerly wants Europe to
engage, secure, and conduct business with Iran for the purchase
of oil & natural gas products in euro transactions,
SO THAT CHINA WILL NOT LOCK UP IRANIAN OUTPUT. Remember
that Putin and the Russians have more European blood coursing
their veins that the Chinese genetic variety. The ties from
Russia to Europe might have a long history of conflict,
but that history is full of long tentacles and deep embraces.
Russia might see China as an eventual adversary, since their
eyes are open. USGovt leaders still see China as a low-cost
supplier and credit supplier. With undue focus on Iraq to
fight terrorism, the US leaders might be outflanked by Russia
and China in Iran. In no way does a UN assault complete
any Pincer maneuver.
THE WIND AT EUROPE’S BACK
Today, the German IFO business confidence
index came out, a favorable rise for the third consecutive
month. It registered the highest level in over five years.
In the US financial sphere, confidence measures are the
fluffy concepts whose statistics are closely tied to stock
indexes, probably responding to the S&P index and not
leading it. In Germany, the
business confidence index is a more important reflection
of their economy, their exports, and a leading indicator
on the euro currency. Even without
help, the EU currency is pointed toward a nice recovery
in 2006. My standing Hat Trick Letter forecast is for the
euro to hit 125 by midyear, and 129 by year end. These might
be easy forecast hits, achieved in spring for the 125 level.
Notice how the euro has risen with the crude
oil price jump last week on the Iran news. The 20-week moving
average has turned upward. The 50-week MA is stopped its
decline and is flattening nicely. The 125 mark is within
easy reach. Recall how FOREX traders called for 115 as the
next stop this winter. They might have hoped to lead sheep
to sell the euro as they bought. The chart indicates “the
euro is a running” and is now in overbought territory.
Recall just a month ago, in “T/A:
Euro Bullish Divergence” a warning was given by
this pen that the euro is about to go running to the northern
plains, to graze, to feed off the bloated USDollar pastures.
The European Union has a trade surplus, a
fact lost on the US intrepid sleepy press & media. The
Euro Central Bank probably has much more gold in their vaults
to back their euro currency than the USA has in its vaults
to back the USDollar. Their EU economy limps along at 1%
GDP growth, roughly equal to any “untreated &
unmassaged” US GDP growth after distortions, exaggerations,
and other negligence are removed.
Here is a tidbit to display vividly why the
US GDP is nowhere near 4.0% growth. This past autumn, competent
economists proclaimed the twin hurricane damage would inflict
a 1.0% to 1.1% hit on the economic growth. Instead, we saw
a 0.5% upward adjustment to Q3 growth and will probably
see a similar distorted lift in reported Q4 growth. Most,
if not all, of US claimed economic growth is improperly
unadjusted price inflation, labeled as growth. The lie is
at least 3%, and likely 4% or more. Our growth is nothing
but price inflation.
My point all along is that with
an absurdly under-stated Consumer Price Index, and an even
lower misrepresented Deflator series (used to remove price
inflation), the US GDP is perhaps 3% lower than reported.
Yes, the EU and USA have a similar 1%
GDP economic growth rate. They tell the truth in Europe,
while the USA lies through its teeth. In fact, we lie on
all important economic statistics, which any young teenager
can discern with the tools learned in school. We lie on
GDP growth, lie on CPI inflation, lie on unemployment rate,
lie on productivity, and lie on savings. This is a grand
disappointment for me personally, to realize my nation has
such engrained institutional lying, apart from politics.
Such statements have no bearing on personal patriotism or
lack thereof. Any such accusation flies in the face of freedom
of speech, and freedom to think for that matter. Of course,
a job requirement for our politicians is to play fast &
loose with the truth and also be well connected to big corporations.
THE 2006 YEAR AHEAD
The 2005 year saw Wall Street dead
wrong about the energy price, but for weather reasons. The
2006 year will see Wall Street dead wrong about the energy
price, but for geopolitical reasons. As
the global economy heaves from the stress of extended asset
bubbles, astronomical imbalances, and gargantuan USGovt
federal deficits, that stress will be felt increasingly
on the geopolitical stage. The continued subsidies to the
USEconomy cannot continue. The continued shun of China from
the G10 Finance Minister Meetings cannot continue. The table
needs at least one more seat.
The United Nations will soon come center
stage. China and Russian hold seats on the important Security
Council, where they can veto sanctions and other initiatives.
Iran has made two important friends. Iran holds the controlling
button on their national crude oil output, and appears willing
to use it as a weapon. They command 4.1 million oil barrels
per day in output, and export 2.5 mb/day. The crude oil
price jumped $3 last Friday when the Iranian leader threatened
to respond to UN sanctions with a 1 million barrel daily
cutback. The oil price has relaxed since. The Dow Jones
Industrial index gave up over 200 points. Volatility is
back, a catch phrase for 2006. Iran
is all about using military leverage, with nuclear overtones,
to fracture and bring an end to the Petro-Dollar.
Perhaps one should hope, in nuclear language
of yesteryear, for a new era of peaceful co-existence for
both a Petro-Dollar and Petro-Euro. Mutually assured destruction
(MAD) is not a viable option. The Western world must adapt
to the arrival of the Shanghai Coop Group, whose store front
will be the Iranian Oil Exchange. Move over, International
Petroleum Exchange (London) and New York Mercantile Exchange.
An Asian kid wants a store front, removed from Western influence,
whose influence has too much history of heavyhandedness.
Unfortunately, the USDollar world reserve
system has been wickedly used and exploited by the USGovt
and US Economy to obtain a free ride amidst what can be
loosely described as an extortion ring. See my “Petro-Dollar
& Protection Racket” from April 2005 for a wake-up
call. Three decades have wrought tremendous abuse and enormous
resentment. The US has obtained a free ride on the highway
of power and wealth. We get rich via inflation without a
sweat operating clean inflationary machinery, while Asia
works in dirty factories and spoils its environment, Europe
struggles within the confines of its own nettlesome social
networks, and the Persian Gulf & Central Asia suffers
as a war zone.
The implications to gold are tremendous
and not to be minimized. If central bankers around the world,
not just in Asia and the Persian Gulf, decide to diversify
their massive foreign reserves, they will grab more gold
for their vaults. It protects them from declines even as
it fortifies their banking systems. It
is curious to me that the Petro-Dollar implications extending
from Iran to the oil market linkage to bonds and currencys
is lost on many analysts. However, the specter of central
bank diversification of US$-based reserves is fully understood
and DREADED. The concepts are
extensions of each other, lost on the financial press. Iran
stands as a direct assault on the Petro-Dollar superstructure
system.
My view is that removal of the Petro-Dollar
system could mean an increase of 2% to long-term US interest
rates, a 2% increase to long-term US mortgage loan rates,
a 20% decline in the USDollar exchange rates, a 20% decline
in the S&P500 index, and a 20% decline in US housing
prices. The end, or even the sunset, of this system would
mean a gigantic lift to the gold price and crude oil price,
likely to rise by at least 50%.
Look for trade war to render most financial
market and economic forecasts wrong in 2006. Trade war is
always on my monitor. Just when one thought China might
be the key player on trade protection and sanctions and
tariffs, enter Iran with its oil card. With Iran, WE HAVE
THE LOUDEST OF TRADE WAR. Not to be outdone, China has responded
to the failed Unocal acquisition deal. When the US Congress
nixed the Unocal deal, and declared “your US$-based
money is no good,” China responded by locking down
the deposits from the entire nation of Kazakhstan, gained
a foothold in Nigeria, and fortified its Iranian contracts.
The message is clear: China will secure Central Asia and
leave the United States to struggle for what it used to
obtain without a struggle. Watch as the fringe of OPEC splinters.
These important events and concepts are examined
from an inter-market viewpoint in the monthly newsletter
referenced below. Huge opportunities exist for personal
investment profit.
THE HAT
TRICK LETTER COMBINES MACRO ANALYSIS
WITH INVESTMENTS.
For specific detailed analysis of the
Gold, USDollar, Treasury bonds, and inter-market dynamics
with the US Economy and Fed monetary policy, see instructions
for subscription to my newsletter research reports, which
include stock recommendations positioned to rise in the
commodity bull market.
|