more articles by

Peter Grandich


Click to enlarge Click to enlarge

Worldwide Markets at Crossroads

By Peter Grandich              Printer Friendly Version

July 3, 2006

“The trouble with most people is that they think with their hopes or fears or wishes rather than with their minds."
- William James "Will" Durant

I’m penning this alert with one foot out the door, as my first summer vacation in seven years looms large. I’m mentally exhausted as both of my companies have never been busier (thank God) and my ministry work has kicked into a higher gear. So please forgive me for not writing a long dissertation on the subjects at hand. I will however, endure to make it abundantly clear how I see things.

The financial markets worldwide are at major crossroads. I do believe we’re on the threshold of social, economic and political changes that only happen once every few centuries. The impact is likely to go beyond most bearish assessments in both scope and time. The very fact that most financial institutions and mainstream media don’t share such a view is actually supportive, as history has demonstrated most of civilization was caught unprepared at key points of history. The next 5 to 10 years is going to be one of those key points.

With regard to the financial markets, there’s a gigantic monster whose actions are about to rock the financial world like never before. Move over boogeyman and say hello to Mr. Hedgefunds. No matter at what area of the markets you look, the footprint of the behemoth is evident. For now, most aren’t complaining as their slash-and-burn way of investing has been overall beneficial to the “Don’t Worry, Be Happy” crowd’s way of thinking. But I believe we’re about to see the monster exposed and what we’ll find is widespread misdeeds and over-leveraging unlike anything ever seen or imaginable on Wall Street. Stay Tuned.


Back in the early to mid 90s when I was a legend in my own mind, I actually thought I could predict market movements on a regular basis. And when a market went against my prediction, it was the market that got it wrong and not I. Therefore, while my flesh would like to gloat about another good call on gold, I’m going to move on after a very short pause… Ah, that felt good-lol.

Seriously, it was very fortunate to sidestep yet another of the sharp, but short, corrections gold has gone through since I returned to the bullish camp in 2003. While it’s not my intention to be portrayed as a market timer (because it’s a losing proposition, IMHO), avoiding these corrections for the most part and getting back on board as the renewed uptrend took hold, has given both a financial and mental comfort zone from which to operate. The corrections so far have been classical secular bull market corrections and are a necessary evil on the march to a new, all-time high for gold above $875 (adjusted for inflation, we’ll need to hit $2,200).

It’s very important for you to have a plan of action for all possibilities and not be left to make decisions during the emotionally-torn moments when markets are cratering. For me, I know when we’re at extremes by what people write and call about, especially after I have made a commentary. When I dare suggested we’re at the most overbought level ever, numerous people voiced opinions otherwise, and some in a manner that leads you to end up asking yourself, “What happen to these folks when they were growing up?”

The last correction went a long way in setting the stage for us to not only get back above the recent highs around $735, but gave us a better base from which to challenge the all-time highs. Just before the correction began (and we stepped aside), there were people literally knocking each other over to exclaim their new or updated bullishness for the precious yellow. And the media, especially the ones who don’t normally even give gold a quote, were issuing one glowing article after another. Sure enough, the correction takes hold and before you can say, “Oh my God”, tirades about how the end-of-the-gold-bull-market-world are everywhere.

I’m not going to publish the quotes or the names of these folks who went from bulls to bears literally overnight because I’ve made enough erroneous forecasts to last a lifetime myself. But it is critical to recognize how fast we went from severely overbought to oversold, yet gold didn’t violate any long-term uptrends or see any significant changes in the bullish fundamentals that remain intact. The good news is (for those of us on the long side), that most of these folks now bearish will not have the intestinal fortitude to reverse their positions again or anytime soon. This can help prevent us getting frothy again too soon.


It’s usually more volatile than gold and recent history has been no exception. But thanks to its “kissing-cousins” relationship with gold, one can’t see new all-time highs for gold and not think that silver will at least track gold up percentage-wise. (In fact, it can lead at times).

Platinum and Palladium

I’ve noted that these metals have the best overall balanced supply and demand picture and therefore offered the least risk of serious losses for the foreseeable future. This also meant they wouldn’t see anywhere near the upside percentage move gold and silver can (and should). Two things have happened that make me even more bullish on the PGMs. First, palladium has corrected back to the $300 area and now offers at least a 30% up move over the next 12 months. And second, the sharp sell-off finally in the overvalued South African Rand has made the South African PGM producers attractive as a group.

Base Metals

It’s critical for you to separate precious metals from base metals. It may seem like poor advice at the moment, but I believe hindsight will end up showing us that as inflation hedges, those investors who chose to lump base metals with precious metals don’t understand the cyclical nature of commodities in general. (And to those who say this time its different- good luck). Many of the bullish base metal forecasters are also predicting a stagflation type overall world economy – a slowing down while inflation rises. Unfortunately, there’s no economic history to support such a stance. Base metals benefit from sustained non or low inflationary economic growth which gives them pricing power because their products aren’t collectively major components of overall consumer price inflation like oil and gas.

The bullish argument (and it’s a good one) is that China and India devour all base metals production and therefore prices can only go higher. The bearish argument contends that the combination of a slowing U.S. and world economy as a whole more than offset the strength from China and India. The other part of the bearish argument is not one being discussed at any great length and is often hard for the novice investor to grasp, but it’s the core of my bearish stance. I mentioned earlier that hedgefunds have been moving in and out of markets in a slash and burn style. They have become the absolute single biggest force ever in the history of world financial markets. They’re not dumb, and I believe as a group have correctly recognized and taken advantage of the three bubbles we’ve had since the 1990s.

The first was in their infancy as the new King – the general stock market of the 1990s. But like all bubbles, that one burst. They then saw real estate as a path to riches and it, too, became a bubble that’s now bursting as we speak. Last year, they grasped the bullish argument for commodities and have now caused a metal like copper to reach bubble status. (Remember, bubbles usually last longer and go higher than most first imagined.) The problem is that most speculators come on board when the bubble is evident and don’t get out before it blows up. The very fact that it is harder to find a needle in a haystack than find a base metals bear among our industry and investors that play it, worries me to near-death. (The numerous emails that this commentary will generate is also an indication).

I believe 2006 should signal the cyclical highs for metals like copper, zinc, nickle and the like. It doesn’t mean they collapse, but their upside is limited if not already fulfilled while precious metals and uranium have clear sailing ahead (outside of the secular bull market corrections we’ve endured so far).


Because it’s the one base metal I speak of in all commentaries, I would like to note that we’re seeing evidence that the supply shortage that helped drive prices up is waning. The International Copper Study Group showed copper production topped consumption by 64,000 tons in the first quarter. The difference now is to sell rallies in copper versus buy dips.

U.S. Dollar

THE ONLY PARTY THAT DOES NOT KNOW THE U.S. DOLLAR IS DEAD IS THE U.S. DOLLAR. It had a recent reprieve because of the emerging market stock market and currencies meltdowns. It also managed to pause in its retreat on the back of the misguided thoughts that a dramatic rise in U.S. interest rates would be the tonic it needed to regain its King status again. Let me say again, THE ONLY PARTY THAT DOESN’T KNOW THE U.S. DOLLAR IS DEAD IS THE U.S. DOLLAR


I think Iran has moved front and center again as it appears not to be prepared to respond in the timeframe the U.N. and key world powers have given it regarding stopping its enrichment of uranium. Refusal to do so or the appearance can only help underpin oil for now. I suspect if we get a hurricane in the Gulf again, we can see oil spike up and test or make new highs. But if this happens, I would want to be a seller into this as I think come Fall, we can begin to see one of the sharpest falls in oil prices in several years back under $60 by Spring of 2007 (okay send those emails).


If all markets were so easy – going up!

Mining Shares

Let’s first remember to separate actual producers (and emerging producers) from exploration companies (“Hopes and Dreams, Inc.”).

The good news is that despite several factors that have hindered mining companies as a whole (more in a moment), producers as a group have benefited from the boon in commodities and investors’ quest to be a part of the action. The market value of the global mining sector rose more than 70 percent in 2005. This has helped lead to a marked increase in mergers and acquisitions (I wrote about this happening this time last year). This has occurred not only because of the key factor that most mining companies can’t replenish reserves fast enough but also due to the fact that profits rose sharply while debt levels tumbled.

Before anyone breaks out the caviar and champagne for the good old boys, just look at some of the factors facing them going forward:

- You wouldn’t know it after you walk the floor of a typical metals and mining show, but there still are not enough big discoveries to make up for the fall in mine supply while demand grows.
- Miners are facing increased desires for more of the pie from stakeholders such as governments, contractors and employees. The government angle is especially scary. I believe only Canada and the U.S. states of Nevada and Alaska offer mining companies real peace. Yes, some areas of the world look dangerous now like Venezuela, Bolivia, Indonesia and the like, but even the upcoming vote in Mexico could change one of the best and most miner-friendly countries into a place of concern (we need to see the results of the Mexican election before even becoming remotely concerned).
- Equipment and labor shortages still affect the mining industry. While mining trucks are coming off the production line as fast as they can be built, shortages still linger. I’ve seen mine production impacted by a shortage of truck tires. Be careful when a company says they plan on drilling because getting an actual drill is no easy task nor having skilled labor to drill, develop and produce ore.
- While the mining sector has started talks with social and environmental activists on a “green” code for the industry, make no mistake about it, the two sides fiercely oppose each other. I would sooner cheer for the opposing team at a Philadelphia Eagles game and believe no arguments or fighter would break out, than count on the environmentalists to be warm and fuzzy to miners.
- Hedgefunds have also impacted the mining industry and could make my bearish argument for base metals a poor one. Phelps Dodge is an example: they use what is called “risk minimizing hedges” at prices of $1.20 or less. Hedgefunds used this as a free shot to bid up copper prices without fear of being swamped by producers selling aggressively into the market because they had enough production to back up their forward sales. This overwhelmed all speculators who stood in their way. Phelps Dodge took a $250 million hit by mark-to-market Rule 133. At a recent meeting of the Society of Economic Geologists, the mining industry was outspoken about their fears of what hedgefunds may be doing to their financial operations.

Don’t assume that a metal price going up automatically translates into a mining company stock doing better. There are many factors influencing the miners that weren’t around (or weren’t acute) in the past bull markets.

It’s been my feeling that the junior resource market is likely to have a good run in the second half of 2006. I think the next 30-60 days is a period of accumulation and a good run up in the juniors should unfold as Fall arrives. But as always, selectivity will be key (more on this in future issues).

Editor’s Note:


Our subscriber base has more than doubled in the last 90 days. I’m honored that so many people feel I’m worthy of their precious time. Unfortunately, there is a very small minority of you who feel some sort of loyalty or obligation to engage posters on the Internet who choose to speak of me and what I do in an unfavorable light. I very much appreciate your gestures to defend me but again ask you not to take such a role. I’m truly not concerned in the least of what these people have to say. I try to leave my spiritual life out of Grandich Publications because people want to read about my market thoughts, not religious. However, it must be told that I truly only care what my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, thinks about me. I’m not implying in any way a need for you to be a believer in Christ – just want to emphasize that HIS is the only opinions I care about. PLEASE don’t engage yourself on the Internet regarding me with some party or parties who in your mind are speaking ill if me. These folks never make their claims to me directly despite every opportunity to do so.

I want to end this discussion on these Internet posters by sharing with you two real-life experiences I was a part of that help me realize never to engage these people. In my other business, I’m very involved with professional athletes and their personal lives. In one instance, I was sitting in the stadium next to a “fan” who was “mouthing off” to a player in a rather nasty fashion. I knew this player personally but remained mostly silent because there’s nothing you can really do that is going to change such a person’s actions. Ironically, the player’s team hosted a gathering later that evening where my friend the player was part of the meet and greet team to the invited guests. And who do I see on the line to meet the players and get stuff signed but this fan that was bad-mouthing the player. I was able to tell the player about it and point out the fan before he approached. When he arrived, he began to tell the player how great he was and then asked for an autograph. Earlier in the stands, this person repeatedly yelled a particular adjective to describe the player. The player signed the autograph with that adjective. When the “fan” looked down and saw what he wrote, he turned white, embarrassed and couldn’t get down the line fast enough.

I tell you that story to point out that these “fans” of mine on the Internet have never in my more than 22 years made their claims and accusations directly to me, other than on the Internet or in an email that never identifies them. However, I know in my heart they are among the crowd at shows but linger in the back versus at least giving me a chance to face my so-called accusers. Those who won’t back up their words with at least a name or face are not worthy of my concern.

The other quick professional athlete story is about the great gift and honor I have to be around household names in the sports world. At a recent Bible study with some members of a team known around the world, we began to discuss some of the things fans say and do. I asked one of the team’s marquee players how he handles the abuse. His response is now etched in my mind whenever someone writes or calls to tell me about some negative comment made about me. He said, “I realize I’m on the playing field and the other party is in the stands. I also realize that ‘but by the Grace of God go I’.” I’ve adopted that attitude so don’t worry about me from now on – okay?

One more note on our increased readership: As a result of the huge increase in subscribers, I can’t possibly response to individual phone calls anymore and most emails so please don’t be offended. I’m not avoiding it and I try to take into consideration your questions when I publish alerts and newsletters.


I will be on my first summer vacation in seven years. I will return on July 17th .


P.O. Box 243 o Perrineville, NJ 08535
phone o 732-642-3992
email •


Grandich Publications, Inc. provides research, analysis, and investor relation services for certain of the companies featured in the articles appearing in its publications (each a “Featured Company”). Featured Companies may pay fees to Grandich Publications, Inc. that may include securities-based compensation that would appreciate if the company’s stock price rises. Accordingly, there is an inherent conflict of interest involved that may influence our perspective and provide an incentive for publishing favorable information with regard to a Featured Company.

Grandich Publications has been given the right to exercise stock options. A complete list of options and share price (in Canadian dollars) is listed on the company website. Furthermore, most companies have entered into agreements to pay Grandich Publications a monthly fee. Fees are also listed on the website.

The material herein is for informational purposes only and is not intended to, and does not constitute the rendering of investment advice or the solicitation or an offer to buy securities.

The foregoing discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). In particular, when used in the preceding discussion, the words “plan,” “confident that,” “believe,” “scheduled,” “expect,” or “intend to,” and similar conditional expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor created by the Act. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any of the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, future events and the financial performance of the Company which are inherently uncertain and actual events and/or results may differ materially.

This report may refer to “measured, indicated and/or inferred mineral resources”, which do not have demonstrated economic viability. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever achieve the status of “ore reserves”. A Preliminary Assessment is based on inferred resources that are geologically speculative, and as a result, there is no certainty that the economic considerations or results will be realized.

Third party statements contained herein and information contained in any source cited herein are not endorsed by or adopted by Grandich Publications, LLC, nor has their accuracy been verified by Grandich Publications, LLC.