KitcoKitco
navigate¬  
Profile Website
Recent Articles ¬
Listing of Articles >>

 
Printer Friendly

Being contrarian?
September 03, 2004

As much as I like to think of myself as a contrarian, I find it difficult to believe that having a negative outlook on the US economy and the US dollar is a contrarian opinion. Of course, here, and at many of the investment conferences I attend, we’re all just preaching to the choir, so I don’t necessarily expect my opinions to be contrarian over here. But do the general public, economists at large, and investors in general really believe the US economy is on solid ground?

Listen to these headlines from the Wall Street Journal: “GM’s August Sales Fall 14%; Ford Reports a 13% decline… Consumer Confidence Wanes As Concern About Jobs Mounts… GM, Ford Plan Cuts in Production… Soft Income Data Suggest Slowdown…”

Just last month Alan Greenspan gave an upbeat review of the economy in his testimony before the Senate, saying that the current recovery is broad-based and sustainable. Hmm, this doesn’t sound like a broad-based and sustainable recovery to me.

In all fairness, Mr. Greenspan has admitted that the economy is going through a “soft patch”, but he expects that the economy will pick up again later this year. Growth may well pick up a bit later this year, who knows? But will a slight upturn in the economy indicate that the worst is over, or will it just be a counter-cyclical upturn in what is otherwise a long-term decline?

My money is on red, lots of it. I expect that corporate profits will decline, stock prices will decline, employment will decline, bond prices will decline and, as a result, government receipts will decline.

At the same time, the government will increase its spending: it has to finance an ever-expanding War on Terrorism and soon it will have to face up to the fact that it stole the baby boomers blind -- their Social Security Account is empty.

Increasing government expenditures and decreasing government receipts -- because the economy is slowing down -- imply higher tax rates. And higher tax rates are not exactly how you stimulate the economy.

Just like the US economic growth during the Nineties became a self-propagating phenomenon -- feeding on itself to keep going while being fueled by foreign capital -- so too will the downturn snowball and grow, with reduced economic activity in one sector spilling over into others. The whole economy is, after all, connected.

Given that the US government has no restraint when it comes to spending money you can bet that the budget deficit is going to keep growing. Financing the budget deficit will ensure that interest rates keep rising and higher interest rates will reduce corporate profits. Lower corporate profits will increase unemployment and an increase in unemployment will put the brakes on consumer spending. Less consumer spending implies less corporate revenues, which means less profits and more lay-offs.

The government gets its money from taxing corporations and individuals. If corporate revenues and profits decline the government gets less tax revenues and so it will increase its taxation of individuals. But it is highly unlikely that the loss of corporate tax revenue can be made up from an increase in personal income tax rates, so even if the government doesn’t increase its current level of spending the budget deficit will grow. And it’s folly to think that the government won’t increase its spending. So read the previous paragraph again.

It’s already happening: All three Big Autos reported lower sales for August, it seems that their incentives are not having enough impact on consumers any more. I wonder why? Could it be that consumers are tapped out? After all, how many new SUVs do we really need?

In response both General Motors and Ford said they are preparing to cut production, and you know what that means… lay-offs. No wonder consumer confidence is waning. On Wednesday the Conference Board announced that its consumer confidence index declined seven percent last month because people are concerned about the job market.

According to the Commerce Department corporate profit growth in America came to an abrupt halt in the second quarter, apparently due to higher energy costs and slowing consumer demand. So it’s not just the auto industry that’s suffering.

But like Bobby McFerrin says: “Don’t worry, be happy.” Americans are, after all, still very wealthy. The median household net worth in the United States was $55,000 dollars in 2000. Eighty-three percent of that, however, is home equity. Without home equity, the median household net worth is only $13,473. But don’t worry, these folks are determined to spend the world out of recession even if it takes all the money they have, and all the money they can borrow.

Realtors are quick to point out that annual median home prices in the US haven’t declined in the past fifty years; so don’t worry. On an inflation-adjusted basis, however, the national median home price has declined in eight of the past thirty-three years.

Mortgage rates will rise as the growing government deficit forces medium and long-term interest rates up. That is likely to put the brakes on the housing bubble that has developed in some parts of the country, such as California, where the median home price shot up twenty-one percent in the past year alone.

But this is an election year; so don’t expect consumers, economists and politicians to pay much attention to anything other than the talking heads on TV. Next year, when the dust has settled, life will return to normal and American consumers will once again wonder where they can get money to go spend at the mall.

I don’t know for how much longer the Chinese, Japanese and other benevolent foreigners are going to send their savings to this country so that we can buy new digital TVs and cell phones, but I do know that I am putting as much of my own money as possible into natural resource stocks -- predominantly mineral exploration companies (if you want to know which ones, you can subscriber to my newsletter; details are at www.paulvaneeden.com).

As much as it doesn’t feel contrarian to be bearish on the dollar and bullish on natural resources, gold is still dirt-cheap (in my opinion) compared to other financial assets and that, alone, is an indication that gold investors are still contrarian enough.

Paul van Eeden

PS I’ll be at the investment conference in Las Vegas next week so there won’t be a commentary next Friday. If you can, you should come too. Details are at www.iiconf.com.


Paul van Eeden works primarily to find investments for his own portfolio and shares his investment ideas with subscribers to his weekly investment publication. For more information please visit his website (www.paulvaneeden.com) or contact his publisher at (800) 528-0559 or (602) 252-4477.

Disclaimer

This letter/article is not intended to meet your specific individual investment needs and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. Nothing contained herein constitutes, is intended, or deemed to be -- either implied or otherwise -- investment advice. This letter/article reflects the personal views and opinions of Paul van Eeden and that is all it purports to be. While the information herein is believed to be accurate and reliable it is not guaranteed or implied to be so. The information herein may not be complete or correct; it is provided in good faith but without any legal responsibility or obligation to provide future updates. Neither Paul van Eeden, nor anyone else, accepts any responsibility, or assumes any liability, whatsoever, for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from the use of the information in this letter/article. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice, may become outdated and will not be updated. Paul van Eeden, entities that he controls, family, friends, employees, associates, and others may have positions in securities mentioned, or discussed, in this letter/article. While every attempt is made to avoid conflicts of interest, such conflicts do arise from time to time. Whenever a conflict of interest arises, every attempt is made to resolve such conflict in the best possible interest of all parties, but you should not assume that your interest would be placed ahead of anyone else’s interest in the event of a conflict of interest. No part of this letter/article may be reproduced, copied, emailed, faxed, or distributed (in any form) without the express written permission of Paul van Eeden. Everything contained herein is subject to international copyright protection.


Your Feedback.
You will stay on this page after you press "submit"