While we wait until after the elections for the gold
price to rally, two other metals warrant a look.
I wrote about silver last month, noting that the silver
price is much more volatile than the gold price and so astute speculators
should be able to make a mint trading it.
A rally in the gold price usually brings buyers into
the silver market as well, and because the silver market (in dollar
terms) is so small, even a modest amount of speculative buying can
significantly drive up the silver price.
It happened recently when the silver price rose from
$4.50 to $7.50 an ounce, only to collapse again to $5.50 earlier
this year. But that’s the nature of the silver market. If
you’re comfortable with volatility, and you remember to sell
when the price runs up, the silver market should treat you well.
The other metal you should be paying attention to
Annual uranium demand for power generation is about
170 million pounds. The big expense in a nuclear power plant is
the capital cost to actually build the plant. Because the price
of uranium accounts for a small portion of the cost of generating
electricity, the utilities can not afford to run out of fuel: they
have to keep operating. So they are likely to start hoarding uranium
at the first sign of a potential supply shortage -- it won’t
be the first time.
The uranium price peaked in 1979 at more than $43
a pound on fears of production shortages and increasing commodity
prices. Since then nuclear power generating facilities have been
hoarding uranium to protect themselves from price volatility and
supply disruptions. However, the supply disruptions never materialized
and the price of the metal declined to less than $8 a pound by 1992.
By 1996 the uranium price had recovered to $16.50
a pound. Then the combination of excess inventory held by utilities
(that reduced the demand for uranium), additional supply coming
from the dismantling of Russian warheads and the strength in the
dollar caused the uranium price to decline from $16.50 to only $7.10
a pound in 2000.
Uranium is currently trading for $19.65 a pound --
a significant increase from where it was only four years ago, but
it could still go higher.
Primary uranium supply from mining is only 75 million
pounds a year, compared to the 170 million pounds of annual demand.
The balance comes from secondary supply such as the drawdown of
excess inventory still left over from the Seventies, dismantling
of Russian nuclear warheads, re-enrichment of spent reactor fuels
and, more recently, the enrichment of uranium tailings.
Most of the secondary supply, with the exception of
weapons-grade uranium being procured from Russia, is not expected
to last for much longer than a few more years.
Cameco, the world’s largest uranium producer,
has been talking about a production shortfall for years. And for
years the imbalance between primary supply and annual demand seemed
benign. The most recent rise in the uranium price, however, might
be an indication that the days of cheap uranium are over. That opens
the possibility of another Seventies-style uranium price-shock,
when the price increased almost seven-fold in less than ten years.
Paul van Eeden
Paul van Eeden works primarily to find investments for his
own portfolio and shares his investment ideas with subscribers to his weekly
investment publication. For more information please visit his website (www.paulvaneeden.com)
or contact his publisher at (800) 528-0559 or (602) 252-4477.
This letter/article is not intended to meet your specific individual investment
needs and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. Nothing contained
herein constitutes, is intended, or deemed to be -- either implied or otherwise
-- investment advice. This letter/article reflects the personal views and opinions
of Paul van Eeden and that is all it purports to be. While the information herein
is believed to be accurate and reliable it is not guaranteed or implied to be
so. The information herein may not be complete or correct; it is provided in
good faith but without any legal responsibility or obligation to provide future
updates. Neither Paul van Eeden, nor anyone else, accepts any responsibility,
or assumes any liability, whatsoever, for any direct, indirect or consequential
loss arising from the use of the information in this letter/article. The information
contained herein is subject to change without notice, may become outdated and
will not be updated. Paul van Eeden, entities that he controls, family, friends,
employees, associates, and others may have positions in securities mentioned,
or discussed, in this letter/article. While every attempt is made to avoid conflicts
of interest, such conflicts do arise from time to time. Whenever a conflict
of interest arises, every attempt is made to resolve such conflict in the best
possible interest of all parties, but you should not assume that your interest
would be placed ahead of anyone else’s interest in the event of a conflict
of interest. No part of this letter/article may be reproduced, copied, emailed,
faxed, or distributed (in any form) without the express written permission of
Paul van Eeden. Everything contained herein is subject to international copyright