"I am delighted that there will be a full hearing," said
Kate Harrison, Greenpeace's lawyer.
"Greenpeace says that the Secretary of State should have
assessed the emissions from the consumption of the new gas and
oil he was giving the green light to and the lawfulness of his
decision not to will be fully aired."
In a written argument, the defendants' lawyers had said the
government believed "there was an insufficient causal
connection between the extraction of oil and gas and the
downstream emissions arising from its consumption to enable
a meaningful assessment of the environmental effects of the
latter."
(Reporting by Shadia Nasralla Additional reporting by Sam
Tobin
Editing by Mark Potter)
LONDON, April 25 (Reuters) - Greenpeace's legal
challenge against the British government over its invitation to
oil and gas explorers last year to apply for licences in the
North Sea can proceed to a full hearing, a judge at London's
High Court ruled on Tuesday.
Last year, Britain held its first oil and gas exploration
licensing round since 2019, with the government saying it was
looking to boost domestic hydrocarbon output as Europe weans
itself off Russian fuel and after energy prices spiked.
Greenpeace says the government and the oil and gas regulator
NSTA should take into account the emissions from burning the oil
and gas produced as a result of the licensing round, rather than
merely the emissions from the extraction process.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Kitco Metals Inc. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Kitco Metals Inc. nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Kitco Metals Inc. and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.