US regulators propose overhaul to bank rating system

Kitco Media
By Reuters
Published:
Updated:
Reuters
US regulators propose overhaul to bank rating system teaser image

WASHINGTON, May 19 (Reuters) - U.S. regulators have proposed an overhaul to ​a confidential rating system for banks, saying ‌the changes would ensure that examiners grade the financial institutions primarily on their financial risks.

The proposed changes to ​the so-called "CAMELS" rating system, which examiners use ​to grade bank health across a range of ⁠categories, are likely to address longstanding industry ​concerns that the metric can be subjective and ​overly punitive.

The proposal was put forward by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, which gathers leaders of the nation's ​bank and credit union regulators to adopt standard ​examination practices.

Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, who ‌chairs ⁠the group, said in a statement that the changes mark "a decisive shift toward transparency, quantitative factors, and predictability of supervisory oversight."

Bowman has led an ​effort from ​Trump-appointed regulators ⁠to overhaul and streamline bank supervision, arguing that examiners need to refocus ​their efforts on core financial risks ​at banks, ⁠following industry complaints for years that they face deficiencies on a host of minor or process-related ⁠issues.

The ​ratings are critically important to ​bank leadership, as insufficient ratings can lead to penalties or business ​restrictions.

Reporting by Pete Schroeder; Editing by Mark Porter

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Kitco Metals Inc. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Kitco Metals Inc. nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Kitco Metals Inc. and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.