Gold’s breakdown was verified – decline continues

Kitco Media
By Przemyslaw Radomski
Published:
Updated:
Kitco Commentaries
Opinions, Ideas and Markets Talk

Featuring views and opinions written by market professionals, not staff journalists.

Gold’s breakdown was verified – decline continues teaser image

Remember the story that I outlined in my gold price forecast for July 2025? We saw more of the same yesterday, but on a micro-scale.

article image

In the previous days/weeks, miners moved higher first, then gold, and finally silver.

The same thing happened in the previous hours/days. Miners moved higher first (in June’s final session they moved higher more than gold and silver did), then gold rallied in the very first session of July, and during yesterday’s session miners lagged gold while silver outperformed. Silver is also outperforming gold today.

This is the mini-version of the same thing, with the same implications. Back then, the implications were bearish on the medium-term basis, and what we just saw and what we see today is bearish on a short-term basis.

article imagearticle image

Silver moved to its previous highs (very briefly so, which is typical for those short-term indications coming from the white metal), while gold didn’t.

Gold verified the breakdown below its rising support/resistance line, and now it’s moving back down – another classic technical move.

Gold’s technical picture didn’t change. What silver is doing is aligned with the “story”. And miners did very little yesterday. After the initial move lower, they ended less than 1% higher. Again, that’s typical topping behavior.

Markets Cheer Tariff Hike Deal

Copper and platinum prices moved higher yesterday, though.

The markets focused on the seemingly positive trade agreement between the U.S. and Vietnam. That’s in tune with my theory that Trump now needs some results and victories.

Still… does it make sense? Quoting Yahoo!Finance:

“Trump said Vietnam's goods imported to the US would face a 20% tariff, lower than the 46% tariff he had levied as part of his "Liberation Day" plans but higher than the blanket 10% tariff currently in effect. He also said Vietnamese goods would face a higher 40% tariff "on any transshipping" — when goods shipped from Vietnam originate from another country, like China.”

Translation: the tariffs were ultimately increased, not decreased compared to the beginning of 2025. Before the “Liberation Day”, Vietnam enjoyed Most Favored Nation (MFN) status with the U.S – so tariffs of about 3%-5%. The rate was then hiked to 46% and on the same it was lowered to 10%. Now, the agreement points to 20%.

This is a huge increase over the previous 3%-5% - this is what matters, not the fact that it was lowered from the fake (it didn’t even stay in effect for one day) 46% rate. But the markets cheered initially, viewing this as a success.

It might be viewed as a success in negotiations, but it is a blow to the world trade / global growth. It is a fundamental reason for the USD to move higher and for the prices of commodities to move lower.

And yet, the emotional impact was the opposite.

article image

Platinum’s Surge Warning

Platinum soared yesterday and while it’s already down today (pretty much erasing yesterday’s rally and forming a shooting star candlestick), yesterday’s upswing showed just how strong the emotional reaction was.

This comes on top of what I wrote about platinum’s extreme sell signal based on its very long-term chart. Quoting my last Friday’s analysis:

(…), I’d like to show you a very long-term chart featuring platinum itself. The data goes back to the late 1960s.

article image

The reason that I’m taking a view this broad is that there are very few analogies in the recent past to how significantly platinum soared this month. This is uncanny and deserves special attention.

Note: I created the above chart yesterday, so it doesn’t include today’s decline.

The bottom of the chart shows the Rate of Change indicator based on the last two months to show how much platinum soared on a short-term basis. The indicator’s goal in this case is to show when monthly rallies were similarly sharp.

There’s only one case in the recent past that is similar and that is the 2008 top. I already wrote about the link between the two situations many times before, and the above chart is one of the confirmations.

However, the list of similar situations doesn’t end there. We saw very similar sharp monthly rallies three times in the 1980s (including at the top!) and three times in the 1970s.

Out of those six cases four happened at major tops, and two were followed by rallies.

“So, maybe we’re in one of those two bullish cases” – you might think. And my answer is that it’s unlikely as when that happened gold was not declining – and in particular it was not weak despite multiple things that should be making it rally.

Consequently, the implication of the current sharp monthly upswing is NOT bullish. It’s clearly bearish. Just because it looks encouraging on a day-to-day basis, it doesn’t change what happened when we saw similar things in the past. There’s no good reason for the situation to be different this time.

This rally doesn’t make fundamental sense – it’s very emotional. The size of the rally itself shows that it’s already huge enough to trigger a reversal – that the emotions are already red-hot and greed is so elevated that it’s time for the market to turn south and decline – quite likely substantially.

article image

Copper moved down today, but unlike platinum, it hasn’t erased yesterday’s gains – yet.

A rally here makes as just as much sense as the rally in platinum does – it doesn’t.

It’s most likely an emotional overreaction to how the news is being presented. The markets are (were?) still buying the narrative instead of focusing on the facts.

I wrote a longer piece on copper two days ago and pretty much everything remains up-to-date.

Thank you for reading my today’s analysis – I appreciate that you took the time to dig deeper and that you read the entire piece. If you’d like to get more (and extra details not available to 99% investors), I invite you to stay updated with our free analyses - sign up for our free gold newsletter now.

Thank you.

Kitco Media

Przemyslaw Radomski

Przemyslaw K. Radomski, CFA, is the founder of Golden Meadow®, an investment platform featuring independent experts who provide premium, research-driven financial insights. With over 17 years of experience analyzing precious metals markets, he specializes in systematic, data-based analysis of gold, silver, and mining stocks. His approach emphasizes rational decision-making, long-term thinking, and principles rooted in Stoic philosophy to maintain emotional discipline in trading.

In addition to building Golden Meadow, Radomski founded The Silver Engineer analytical brand and authored Silver Rising: 100 Reasons Why Silver Will Soar, a comprehensive study of silver’s structural transformation. A CFA® Charterholder who completed PhD studies in Economics, he previously managed a gold hedge fund and accurately called the 2020 precious metals bottom within 30 minutes of its formation.

Mdi Earth Logo
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Kitco Metals Inc. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Kitco Metals Inc. nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Kitco Metals Inc. and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.