US Reps say private companies could profit unfairly from Boston Fed CBDC

Kitco Media
By Ernest Hoffman
Published
Updated
Kitco News
The Leading News Source in Precious Metals

Kitco NEWS has a diverse team of journalists reporting on the economy, stock markets, commodities, cryptocurrencies, mining and metals with accuracy and objectivity. Our goal is to help people make informed market decisions through in-depth reporting, daily market roundups, interviews with prominent industry figures, comprehensive coverage (often exclusive) of important industry events and analyses of market-affecting developments.

Editor's Note: With so much market volatility, stay on top of daily news! Get caught up in minutes with our speedy summary of today's must-read news and expert opinions. Sign up here!

(Kitco News) - Nine members of the United States Congress wrote a letter to Susan Collins, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston yesterday, warning that the Bank’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) initiative could give certain companies an unfair advantage.

Congressman Tom Emmer (MN-06), the Ranking Republican on the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, and Ranking Member Patrick McHenry (NC-10), wrote the letter outlining the lawmakers’ concerns about ‘Project Hamilton’.

“It was brought to our attention that some firms participating in the collaboration may be planning to use Project Hamilton to research, develop, and scale CBDC products with the intent to then sell those products to commercial banks,” Emmer wrote.

“The unfair advantage that some private companies could enjoy from this partnership and the failure to ensure the principles of privacy, sovereignty, and free markets should be concerning to every American.”

Project Hamilton is a collaboration between the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and the Digital Currency Initiative at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to research the potential development of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) in the United States.

The letter was also signed by House Financial Services Committee members Ann Wagner (MO-02), Ted Budd (NC-13), Bill Huizenga (MI-02), Andy Barr (KY-06), French Hill (AR-02), Anthony Gonzalez (OH-16), and Warren Davidson (OH-08).

It asks pointed questions about Project Hamilton’s funding sources and other forms of engagement with the private sector. The lawmakers said they want to know which firms are or have been involved with Project Hamilton, to what extent Project Hamilton has already engaged with the firms, whether Phase II of the project will involve continued engagement with the private sector, and whether the Boston Fed intends to fund private sector startups through the project.

They also expressed worries about the risk that firms already involved with Project Hamilton will have a regulatory advantage over competitors and asked how the project plans to address concerns about Americans’ financial privacy and financial freedom in the context of a CBDC.

“It is important that the firms engaging with Project Hamilton do not receive an unfair competitive advantage over current or future competitors,” Emmer wrote. “Neither the federal government nor the Federal Reserve Banks should be in the business of picking winners and losers in the private markets.”

Emmer has expressed his concerns about a U.S. CBDC before. In January, he introduced a bill to prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC directly to individuals.

There are a number of CBDC projects currently underway in the United States. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York announced a 12-week CBDC pilot project in collaboration with commercial banks on Nov. 15, writing that its New York Innovation Center (NYIC) will participate in a proof-of-concept project for a CBDC. The project is designed to test “technical feasibility, legal viability, and business applicability of distributed ledger technology” on a regulated liability network (RLN).

The New York Fed also announced the launch of Phase II of Project Cedar, which explores the technical framework for a “theoretical wholesale central bank digital currency (wCBDC)”. Project Cedar Phase II x Ubin+ is a joint effort between the NYIC and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) intended to investigate how wCBDCs could improve the efficiency of cross-border wholesale payments involving multiple currencies.

But even within the Federal Reserve Bank of New York itself, there are dissenting voices about the appropriateness and feasibility of a CBDC. On Nov. 23, Antoine Martin, a financial stability advisor at the New York Fed, suggested that “Instead of issuing a retail CBDC, central banks could support stablecoins by allowing them to be backed one-for-one with balances in a central bank account.”

Martin proposed that private-sector stablecoins be utilized by the central bank in lieu of government-developed CBDCs, an approach that he said more closely aligns with the economic model of capitalism.

Kitco Media

Ernest Hoffman

Ernest Hoffman is a Crypto and Market Reporter for Kitco News. He has over 15 years of experience as a writer, editor, broadcaster and producer for media, educational and cultural organizations. Ernest began working in market news in 2007, establishing the broadcast division of CEP News in Montreal, Canada, where he developed the fastest web-based audio news service in the world and produced economic news videos in partnership with MSN and the TMX. He has a Bachelor's degree Specialization in Journalism from Concordia University. You can reach Ernest at 1-514-670-1339.

Mdi Earth Logo

Tags:

Share

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Kitco Metals Inc. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Kitco Metals Inc. nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Kitco Metals Inc. and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.