Crypto companies without EU licences face prosecution, French regulator warns

Kitco Media
By Reuters
Published:
Updated:
Reuters
Crypto companies without EU licences face prosecution, French regulator warns teaser image

PARIS, May 28 (Reuters) - France’s top markets regulator warned crypto companies they could be blacklisted and sued if they do ​not get an EU licence to operate by end of June, ‌as the bloc fully rolls out tighter regulation of crypto.

Under the European Union's crypto rules, MiCA, crypto companies have until June 30 to get a ​licence to continue operating in the bloc. European regulators have ​already warned that companies without licences need to have "orderly wind-down ⁠plans" in place.

The rules, which were agreed in 2023, bring regulatory ​oversight to the multi-trillion-dollar crypto industry's operations in Europe, even as ​U.S. President Donald Trump's administration has eased regulation for the crypto sector in the U.S..

"It’s becoming very, very urgent to finalise the licences applications," Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani, president of ​the French markets regulator, AMF, told journalists on Thursday.

Crypto companies which have ​not secured licences by the EU's deadline will be put on blacklists and ‌will ⁠face enforcement action, including prosecution, if they continue to seek EU customers without authorisation, Barbat-Layani said.

Under MiCA, crypto companies have to apply for licences from regulators in individual EU countries, which they can use as a "passport" to ​operate throughout the ​27-nation bloc.

Last ⁠year, some regulators became concerned about differences in how countries were applying the rules, with the speed of ​licence approvals in Malta drawing scrutiny from the European Securities ​and Markets ⁠Authority (ESMA).

Barbat-Layani reiterated that France would be prepared to block the passporting of licences granted by other countries if it does not agree with ⁠that country's ​decision, a stance first reported by Reuters in ​September.

Still, she said, this would not be what the regulator would want, as it ​would represent a "serious collective failure".

Reporting by Elizabeth Howcroft, editing by John O'Donnell

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Kitco Metals Inc. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Kitco Metals Inc. nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Kitco Metals Inc. and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.