BOC Aviation awarded $406 mln over planes stuck in Russia

Kitco Media
By Reuters
Published:
Updated:
Reuters

NEW YORK, April 12 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Tuesday ordered Russia's largest cargo airline to pay aircraft lessor BOC Aviation Ltd (601988.SS) $406.2 million after being declared in default on leases for three Boeing 747-8 freighters following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman in Manhattan found the defendant AirBridgeCargo Airlines LLC and its parent Volga-Dnepr Logistics BV liable, after the invasion and resulting sanctions left the plaintiff BOC Aviation unable to reclaim the aircraft.

Lawyers for the defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment. BOC declined comment.

Aircraft lessors have sued multiple insurers and lessees in mainly European courts for billions of dollars over hundreds of aircraft stuck in Russia since Russia's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

BOC Aviation said AirBridgeCargo went into default after being unable to maintain required reinsurance coverage.

This followed restrictions imposed by the European Union against Russian carriers on aircraft used in Russia, and Russian sanctions on foreign assets, including internationally leased aircraft.

BOC Aviation said it was able to recover one leased plane and two of its four engines, while the two other planes and two other engines remained in Russia.

The lessor's majority shareholder is Bank of China Ltd (601988.SS).

In a 57-page decision, Liman said BOC Aviation had proven that the Russian government had "effected a seizure" of the planes and engines by keeping them from being used outside Russia, "save perhaps to areas in Ukraine or for the purposes of the war."

The judge said that undermined BOC Aviation's ability to carry out its right to reclaim possession.

He also rejected AirBridgeCargo's defenses that neither side could have foreseen a default, and it was impossible to ground the planes outside Russia because the country had ordered them flown back.

Similar arguments have been set out in other cases, but the lack of standardised terms and a tradition of contractual secrecy in the jet industry has made it difficult for lessors to pool their claims into one class action, industry sources say,

Liman ruled after a one-day non-jury trial held on April 3.

The case is BOC Aviation Ltd v AirBridgeCargo Airlines LLC et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-02070.

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Jamie Freed and Jason Neely
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Kitco Metals Inc. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Kitco Metals Inc. nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Kitco Metals Inc. and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.